| Literature DB >> 34923977 |
Séverine Erismann1,2, Jean-Pierre Gami3, Boukari Ouedraogo3, Damien Revault1,2, Helen Prytherch4,5, Filippo Lechthaler1,2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Attendance of maternal and infant care services in rural Chad are consistently low. Our study aimed to assess the use of antenatal (ANC) and postnatal care (PNC) services, health facility delivery and infant health services after 4 years of a health systems intervention for improving the infrastructure, supplies, training and sensitization for maternal and infant health in two districts of rural Chad.Entities:
Keywords: Antenatal care; Health system strengthening; Low resource; Maternal and child care; Quality of care; Rural setting
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34923977 PMCID: PMC8684686 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12330-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Fig. 1Visualization of the stratified two-stage cluster sampling methodology. Description of data: The figure shows the stratified two-stage cluster sampling methodology applied to achieve a representative sample of the two population groups in the study area
Characteristics of the study participants in two districts of Chad
| Socio-demographic characteristics | Baseline 2015 | Endline 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | |
| Women with infant | 1144 (100%) | 1082 (100%) |
| Settled communities | 786 (69%) | 810 (69%) |
| Mobile pastoralists | 358 (31%) | 365 (31%) |
| 16–20 | 252 (22%) | 233 (22%) |
| 21–30 | 534 (47%) | 542 (50%) |
| 31–40 | 303 (27%) | 249 (23%) |
| 40+ | 53 (4%) | 58 (5%) |
| Primary school (completed) | 324 (41%) | 380 (53%) |
| Secondary school (completed) | 129 (16%) | 257 (36%) |
| Higher education + (completed) | 9 (1%) | 3 (< 1%) |
| Primary school (completed) | 34 (9%) | 3 (1%) |
| Secondary school (completed) | 4 (1%) | 0 |
| Secondary school + (completed) | 0 | 0 |
a % calculated with respect to the corresponding sub-sample
Changes in antenatal care attendance among pregnant women in two districts of Chad
| ANC1a (95% CI) | ANC4b (95% CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | Endline | Baseline | Endline | ||
| Settled communities | Global | ||||
| Yao | 45% (38–53%) | 59% (48–69%) | 7% (3–15%) | 14% (6–31%) | |
| Danamadji | 94% (91–96%) | 97% (94–98%) | 46% (42–51%) | 61% (50–71%) | |
| Mobile pastoralists | Global | ||||
| Yao | 27% (19–37%) | 13% (0.01–76%) | 4% (1–17%) | 6% (3–10%) | |
| Danamadji | 74% (55–87%) | 72% (65–78%) | 17% (6–40%) | 22% (17–29%) | |
aANC1 Number of pregnant women who attended at least the first antenatal care consultation
bANC4 Number of pregnant women who attended four antenatal consultations
Changes in the reasons given by women for not attending the first ANC in two districts of Chad
| Distance | Costs | Insufficient quality | Poor reception | Not part of their habit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 2018 | 2015 | 2018 | 2015 | 2018 | 2015 | 2018 | 2015 | 2018 | ||
| Global | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | 2% | 1% | |||||
| Yao | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | 2% | 1% | |||||
| Danamadji | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | ||||||
| Global | 19% | 5% | 3% | 1% | 2% | 3% | |||||
| Yao | 19% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 2% | 0% | |||||
| Danamadji | 20% | 10% | 6% | 0% | 2% | 10% | |||||
Note: the percentages in this table are calculated as simple proportions representing the number of reported reasons to the number of participants not attending the first ANC
Changes in the percentage of women who delivered at home in two districts of Chad
| Home delivery (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Global | |||
| Yao | 93% (80–98%) | 83% (64–94%) | |
| Danamadji | 61% (54–69%) | 51% (43–59%) | |
| Global | |||
| Yao | 97% (82–99%) | 100% | |
| Danamadji | 88% (83–92%) | 100% | |
Changes in the percentage of women attending postnatal consultation without an infant in two districts of Chad
| Postnatal consultation without infant (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Global | |||
| Yao | 5% (2–15%) | 25% (21–30%) | |
| Danamadji | 51% (44–58%) | 96% (57–99%) | |
| Global | |||
| Yao | 17% (9–29%) | 2% (0–4%) | |
| Danamadji | 14% (6–22%) | 15% (10–20%) | |
Changes in the percentage of women attending postnatal consultation with their infant in two districts of Chad
| Postnatal consultation with infant (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Global | |||
| Yao | 11% (6–20%) | 28% (17–40%) | |
| Danamadji | 59% (48–68%) | 96% (57–99%) | |
| Global | |||
| Yao | 6% (2–19%) | 0% | |
| Danamadji | 15% (6–32%) | 9% (6–14%) | |
Changes in the percentage of women who reported their infant being sick in the last 6 months in two districts of Chad
| Infant sickness (reported by the mother) (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Global | |||
| Yao | |||
| Danamadji | 70% (60–78%) | 62% (53–71%) | |
| Global | |||
| Yao | |||
| Danamadji | 80% (73–85%) | 81% (33–97%) | |
Changes in the percentage of vaccination coverage (parental recall) in two districts of Chad
| Vaccination coverage (95% IC) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline 2015 | Endline 2018 | ||
| Settled communities | Global ( | ||
| Yao ( | 56% (50–62%) | 67% (55–78%) | |
| Danamadji ( | 93% (90–95%) | 95% (92–97%) | |
| Mobile pastoralists | Global ( | ||
| Yao ( | 18% (10–32%) | 82% (76–87%) | |
| Danamadji ( | 1% (0.1–19%) | 85% (80–90%) | |
Association between health service use, vaccination coverage, and different socio-demographic and geographical variables
| ANC1 | Home delivery | PNCd with infant | Infant vaccinated | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ORa (95% CI) | ORa (95% CI) | ORa (95% CI) | ORa (95% CI) | |
| Lower SESb | 0.99 (0.78–1.26) | 1.30 (1–1.70) | 0.69 (0.55–0.88)** | 1.11 (0.78–1.43) |
| Higher SES | 0.79 (0.58–1.07) | 0.72 (0.53–0.98)* | 1.03 (0.76–1.39) | 0.88 (0.64–1.20) |
| DSc Danamadji | 10.56 (8.12–13.71)** | 0.18 (0.14–0.25)** | 4.43 (3.49–5.63)** | 5.56 (4.25–7.26)** |
| Settled population | 4.22 (3.22–5.53)** | 0.29 (0.22–0.41)** | 4.38 (3.49–5.63)** | 12.53 (8.80–17.89)** |
| Secondary school completed | 3.80 (1.82–7.92)** | 0.47 (0.34–0.67)** | 4.45 (3.40–5.64)** | 1.74 (1.20–2.52)** |
| Survey year 2018 | 1.02 (0.79–1.34) | 0.58 (0.42–0.80)** | 1.71 (1.33–2.20)** | 1.63 (1.22–2.19)** |
| Affected by a PADS intervention | 1.76 (1.26–2.45)** | 0.66 (0.47–0.93)* | 6.74 (4.56–9.96)** | 0.85 (0.61–1.20) |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001
aOdds ratios (ORs) refer to the period effects. Multivariate linear regression models were adjusted for the categorical socio-economic status (SES) variable
bSES Socio-economic status
cDistrict Sanitaire
dPNC Postnatal care