| Literature DB >> 34922582 |
Yu He1,2,3,4,5, Weixia Du1,2,3,4,5, Sa Xiao1,2,3,4,5, Benhua Zeng6, Xiang She1,2,3,4,5, Dong Liu7, Hua Du3,4, Luquan Li1,2,3,4,5, Fang Li1,2,3,4,5, Qing Ai1,2,3,4,5, Junli He8, Chao Song9, Hong Wei10, Xiaodong Zhao11,12,13,14,15, Jialin Yu16,17,18,19,20,21.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) remains a life-threatening disease in neonates. Numerous studies have shown a correlation between the intestinal microbiota and NEC, but the causal link remains unclear. This study aimed to demonstrate the causal role of gut microbiota in NEC and explore potential mechanisms involved.Entities:
Keywords: Butyric acid; Fecal microbiota transplantation; Germ free; Gut microbiota; Necrotizing enterocolitis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34922582 PMCID: PMC8684079 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-03109-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
General information of patients with necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and controls
| Total | Surgical patients | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEC group | Control group | p | NEC group | Control group | p | |
| GA (weeks), median (IQR) | 31.0 (29.4–33.7) | 31.1(29.3–33.2) | 0.75 | 31.8 (29.4–33.1) | 33.3 (29.8–34.1) | 0.26 |
| Age (days), median (IQR) | 15 (12–19) | 15 (12–18) | 0.81 | 11 (9–22) | 4 (3–7) | < 0.01 |
| BW (g), median (IQR) | 1710 (1405–1970) | 1720 (1360–1960) | 0.84 | 1950 (1320–2230) | 1920 (1670–2260) | 0.62 |
| Female, n (%) | 40 (49.4%) | 45 (55.6%) | 0.43 | 10 (52.6%) | 9 (47.4%) | 0.75 |
IQR interquartile range, NEC necrotizing enterocolitis, GA gestational age, BW birth weight
Fig. 1The intestinal microbiota in necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) patients and control cases. a The α-phylogenetic diversity analysis revealed that NEC patients were characterized with lower richness in Ace, Chao and Shannon indexes compared to healthy controls. b Relative abundances at the phylum level present in each sample from NEC patients (left, red bar) and controls (right, black bar). c Phylogenetic tree of the 10 most abundant genera of gut microbiota in human NEC samples and controls. d The average relative abundances at the level of the phyla in the NEC and control groups. e Statistical analysis of the upregulated or downregulated phyla between the NEC and control groups
Fig. 2Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis of short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) in fecal samples from necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) patients and control cases. Error bars indicate medianand interquartile range. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons between NEC and control groups.The level of butyrate was decreased in the NEC patients compared to the controls (p < 0.01)
Fig. 3Proportion of lamina propria Tregs in surgical patients with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) versus non-NEC surgical controls. a Representative plot of the CD4+CD25+Foxp3+T cell population in surgical NEC and non-NEC surgical control patients. b Expression of lamina propria Treg/Thelper cell ratio by postnatal age. c Percentage of CD3+ T cells in the lymphocyte population from the ileal lamina propria of surgical NEC or non-NEC surgical control patients. d Percentage of Thelper cells in CD3+ T cells from ileal lamina propria of surgical NEC or non-NEC control patients. e Treg/Thelper cell ratio from ileal lamina propria cells of surgical NEC patients or non-NEC surgical control patients. Error bars indicate median and interquartile range. The Mann–Whitney U test was used for comparisons between NEC and control groups
Fig. 4Cytokine gene expression in ileal tissues from surgical necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) patients compared with non-NEC controls. IL interleukin, TGF transforming growth factor, TNF tumor necrosis factor
Fig. 5Comparative assessment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)-like injuries and proportion of lamina propria Tregs between mice that received microbiota from NEC patients or control patients and underwent a NEC-induction protocol. a Histopathological evaluation of inflammation present in intestinal tissues from the GN, GC, GNB and GCB groups (100 × magnification). b NEC score of intestinal tissue injuries [0 (normal ileum) to 4 (loss of intestinal villi with necrosis and transmural necrosis)] observed in the GN, GC, GNB and GCB groups. c Representative flow plot of the Treg population in the lamina propria of mice from GN, GC, GNB and GCB groups. d Percentage of Treg cells in Thelper cells in lamina propria of mice from GN, GC, GNB and GCB groups. GN NEC patient fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) plus NEC model, GC control patient FMT plus NEC model, GNB butyrate-treated with NEC patient FMT and NEC model, GCB butyrate-treated with control patient FMT and NEC model. GN, n = 10; GC, n = 10; GNB and GCB, n = 11. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01
Fig. 6Gut microbial and metabolite characteristics of recipient mice after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). a At the operational taxonomic units (OTU) level, the principal component analysis (PCA) showed that gut microbiota composition of NEC microbiome recipient mice was significantly different compared to control microbiome recipient mice(p < 0.01). b No significant differences were found by PCA between the GC and GCB groups. c No significant differences were found by PCA between the GN and GNB groups. d The average relative abundances at the phyla level in each group. e Mann–Whitney U test of the upregulated or downregulated phyla in the GC and GN groups. f Relative abundance of top 20 OTUs responsible for discriminating NEC microbiome-recipient mice and control microbiome-recipient mice in GN, GC, GNB and GCB groups. g Level of butyrate in mice from GC and GN groups. GN, NEC patient fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) plus NEC model; GC, control patient FMT plus NEC model; GNB, butyrate-treated with NEC patient FMT and NEC model; GCB, butyrate-treated with control patient FMT and NEC model; HCF, mixed fecal samples from control patients for FMT; HNF, mixed fecal samples from NEC patients for FMT. *p < 0.05