| Literature DB >> 34922518 |
Natalia S Goncharova1, Heber Ivan Condori Leandro2, Aleksandr D Vakhrushev2, Elena G Koshevaya2, Yury A Skorik2, Lubov B Mitrofanova2, Lada A Murashova2, Lev E Korobchenko2, Elizaveta M Andreeva2, Dmitry S Lebedev2, Olga M Moiseeva2, Evgeny N Mikhaylov3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mechanisms of positive effects of pulmonary artery (PA) denervation (PADN) remain poorly understood. The study aimed to evaluate pulmonary hemodynamic changes after PADN and their association with the extent of PA wall damage in an acute thromboxane A2 (TXA2)-induced pulmonary hypertension (PH) model in swine.Entities:
Keywords: Large animal models; Pulmonary denervation; Pulmonary hypertension; Radiofrequency ablation; Synthetic analogue of thromboxane A2
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34922518 PMCID: PMC8684280 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-021-01786-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pulm Med ISSN: 1471-2466 Impact factor: 3.317
Fig. 1Study flowchart. RHC -right heart catheterization; PH-modeling-1—pulmonary hypertension induction using continuous TXA2 infusion before PADN; PH-modeling-2—pulmonary hypertension induction using continuous TXA2 infusion after PADN; PADN—pulmonary artery denervation; mPAP—mean pulmonary artery pressure
Fig. 2Three-dimensional electroanatomic map of the pulmonary artery with stimulation points where phrenic nerve was captured (gray points) and RF ablation points (red points)
Baseline hemodynamic characteristics of the three groups (Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA, mean ± SD)
| Parameters | All pigs, n = 17 | Group I (PH-PADN), n = 9 | Group II (non PH-PADN), n = 4 | Group III (PH-shamPADN) n = 4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR, beat/min | 97.5 ± 15.4 | 96.9 ± 11.0 | 97.8 ± 29.2 | 98.8 ± 9.1 | 0.86 |
| SBP, mmHg | 94.0 ± 11.5 | 93.1 ± 10.3 | 90.3 ± 12.6 | 99.8 ± 13.7 | 0.47 |
| DBP, mmHg | 54.0 ± 7.7 | 55.9 ± 5.8 | 50.5 ± 3.1 | 53.3 ± 13.7 | 0.21 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 66.8 ± 9.2 | 67.1 ± 8.5 | 64.3 ± 6.4 | 68.8 ± 14.3 | 0.80 |
| SPAP, mm Hg | 16.8 ± 3.9 | 17.2 ± 4.5 | 15.3 ± 3.3 | 17.3 ± 2.6 | 0.52 |
| DPAP, mm Hg | 12.0 ± 3.5 | 12.4 ± 3.8 | 10.3 ± 1.7 | 12.8 ± 4.3 | 0.58 |
| mPAP, mm Hg | 13.5 ± 3.7 | 13.9 ± 4.0 | 11.8 ± 2.5 | 14.5 ± 4.0 | 0.54 |
| RAP, mm Hg | 3.5 ± 2.2 | 3.9 ± 2.0 | 2.3 ± 1.5 | 4.0 ± 3.2 | 0.36 |
| PCWP, mm Hg | 4.4 ± 1.8 | 4.4 ± 2.1 | 3.8 ± 1.3 | 4.8 ± 1.7 | 0.74 |
| CO, l/min | 4.5 ± 1.5 | 4.7 ± 1.8 | 5.1 ± 1.3 | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 0.21 |
| PVR, dyn/s/sm | 186.6 ± 94.4 | 181.7 ± 85.4 | 139.7 ± 73.8 | 244.8 ± 122.8 | 0.37 |
| SVR, dyn/s/sm−5 | 1252.7 ± 419.2 | 1213.0 ± 455.6 | 1018.0 ± 240.2 | 1576.5 ± 328.9 | 0.19 |
PH—pulmonary hypertension; PADN—pulmonary artery denervation; HR—heart rate; SBP—systolic blood pressure; DBP—diastolic blood pressure; mBP—mean arterial pressure; SPAP—systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; DPAP—diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; mPAP—mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP—right atrial pressure; PCWP—pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CO—cardiac output; PVR—pulmonary vascular resistance; SVR—systemic vascular resistance
Hemodynamic data after PADN during the normotensive period without the phase of PH induction in groups I (PH-PADN) and II (non-PH-PADN), (mean ± SD)
| Parameters | Group I (PH-PADN) | Group II (nonPH-PADN) n = 4 | Difference between baseline and after PADN | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group (PH-PADN), n = 6 | Group II (nonPH-PADN), n = 4 | |||||
| Weight, kg | 35.7 ± 2.6 | 39.5 ± 3.1 | 0.06 | – | – | – |
| Ablation number | 28.7 ± 16.5 | 21.3 ± 0.5 | 0.4 | – | – | – |
| PA trunk ablation number | 12.0 ± 6.1 | 8.3 ± 0.9 | 0.2 | – | – | – |
| Left PA, ablation number | 8.2 ± 6.0 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 0.6 | – | – | – |
| Right PA, ablation number | 8.6 ± 4.8 | 6.5 ± 0.6 | 0.4 | – | – | – |
| HR, beats/min | 104.7 ± 17.2 | 95.0 ± 13.7 | 0.35 | 10.3 ± 20.5 | −2.7 ± 15.6 | 0.46 |
| SBP, mmHg | 96.3 ± 7.7 | 83.5 ± 8.3 | 0.038 | 0.5 ± 16.3 | −6.8 ± 8.8 | 0.26 |
| DBP, mmHg | 62.8 ± 11.1 | 42.0 ± 5.0 | 0.066 | 6.2 ± 13.9 | −8.5 ± 6.9 | 0.06 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 74.0 ± 9.5 | 56.0 ± 4.3 | 0.066 | 6.0 ± 15.9 | −8.3 ± 7.5 | 0.1 |
| SPAP, mm Hg | 18.7 ± 4.8 | 19.0 ± 8.8 | 0.61 | -0.0 ± 3.0 | 3.8 ± 10.4 | 0.91 |
| DPAP, mm Hg | 11.8 ± 4.6 | 14.8 ± 7.6 | 0.47 | −1.7 ± 3.9 | 4.5 ± 7.8 | 0.26 |
| mPAP, mm Hg | 14.2 ± 4.4 | 16.0 ± 8.1 | 0.91 | −0.8 ± 3.4 | 4.3 ± 8.6 | 0.47 |
| mRAP, mm Hg | 3.5 ± 3.0 | 5.0 ± 4.2 | 0.47 | −0.3 ± 3.7 | 2.8 ± 4.5 | 0.26 |
| PCWP, mm Hg | 4.0 ± 1.7 | 5.0 ± 3.4 | 0.91 | −0.0 ± 2.3 | 1.3 ± 3.6 | 0.76 |
| CO, l/min | 4,6 ± 1,9 | 5.5 ± 1.7 | 0.61 | −0.2 ± 1.1 | 0.4 ± 1,8 | 0.61 |
| PVR, dyn/s/sm | 214.8 ± 138.2 | 177.5 ± 102.8 | 0.76 | 14.1 ± 61.5 | 37.8 ± 125.0 | 1 |
| SVR, dyn/s/sm−5 | 1474.6 ± 755.9 | 779.2 ± 141.1 | 0.17 | 318.9 ± 399.7 | −238.8 ± 244.7 | 0.038 |
PH—pulmonary hypertension; PADN—pulmonary artery denervation; HR—heart rate; SBP—systolic blood pressure; DBP—diastolic blood pressure; mBP—mean arterial pressure; SPAP –systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; DPAP—diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; mPAP—mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP- right atrial pressure; PCWP—pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CO—cardiac output; PVR—pulmonary vascular resistance; SVR—systemic vascular resistance
* Mann–Whitney U two-sided exact test; † Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Hemodynamic data and the TXA2 dosage on PH modeling-2 in group I (PH-PADN) and group III (PH-shamPADN) (mean ± SD)
| Parameters | Group I (PH-PADN), n = 6 | Group III (PH-shamPADN), n = 4 | Difference between PH 1 and PH 2 modeling | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (PH-PADN), n = 6 | Group III (PH-shamPADN), n = 4 | |||||
| Weight, kg | 35.7 ± 2.6 | 39.2 ± 1.9 | 0.038 | |||
| TXA2 dose, μg/kg for PH 1 | 20.1 ± 7.1 | 24.5 ± 5.7 | 0.35 | 3.25 ± 1.9 | 3.26 ± 8.3 | 0.5 |
| TXA2 dose, μg/kg for PH 2 | 18.9 ± 6.7 | 21.2 ± 8.2 | 0.9 | |||
| Time to target mPAP-1, min | 20.0 ± 11.0 | 18.8 ± 6.3 | 0.76 | 4 ± 2.2 | 2.5 ± 10.4 | 0.73 |
| Time to target mPAP-2, min | 18.3 ± 8.8 | 16.3 ± 9.5 | 0.61 | |||
| HR, beat/min | 117.6 ± 20.6 | 115.8 ± 14.9 | 0.9 | 2.2 ± 10.6 | −5.5 ± 16.5 | 0.5 |
| SBP, mmHg | 94.8 ± 13.8 | 104.0 ± 36.5 | 0.5 | 10.0 ± 10.9 | −1.0 ± 37.7 | 0.5 |
| DBP, mmHg | 66.8 ± 12.5 | 62.3 ± 24.3 | 0.9 | 6.0 ± 6.5 | −0.8 ± 27.0 | 0.7 |
| mBP, mm Hg | 76.2 ± 11.5 | 76.0 ± 27.9 | 0.9 | 7.2 ± 8.1 | −0.5 ± 30.0 | 0.7 |
| SPAP, mm Hg | 44.6 ± 5.0 | 42.8 ± 1.0 | 0.28 | 1.2 ± 4.3 | −1.5 ± 3.1 | 0.28 |
| DPAP, mm Hg | 34.4 ± 2.9 | 38.0 ± 0.8 | 0.06 | −1.2 ± 1.8 | −1.0 ± 1.4 | 0.9 |
| mPAP, mm Hg | 38.2 ± 2.5 | 39.8 ± 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 ± 1.2 | −1.5 ± 1.7 | 0.2 |
| mRAP, mm Hg | 7.2 ± 1.9 | 5.3 ± 2.2 | 0.28 | −2.2 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 0.8 | 0.015 |
| PCWP, mm Hg | 5.6 ± 0.6 | 6.8 ± 10 | 0.11 | −1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.3 ± 1.3 | 0.06 |
| CO, l/min | 3.0 ± 1.5 | 2.4 ± 0.7 | 1 | 0.8 ± 1.5 | 0.3 ± 1.4 | 0.9 |
| PVR, dyn/s/sm−5 | 740.9 ± 421.2 | 1228.9 ± 524.3 | 0.4 | −171.6 ± 874.5 | 107.7 ± 798.2 | 0.9 |
| SVR, dyn/s/sm−5 | 2091.8 ± 800.8 | 2373.7 ± 692.8 | 0.7 | 10.0 ± 623.1 | 101.0 ± 549.0 | 0.9 |
PH—pulmonary hypertension; PADN—pulmonary artery denervation; HR—heart rate; SBP—systolic blood pressure; DBP—diastolic blood pressure; mBP—mean arterial pressure; SPAP –systolic pulmonary arterial pressure; DPAP—diastolic pulmonary arterial pressure; mPAP—mean pulmonary artery pressure; RAP—right atrial pressure; PCWP—pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; CO—cardiac output; PVR—pulmonary vascular resistance; SVR—systemic vascular resistance
*Mann–Whitney U two-sided exact test
†Wilcoxon signed-rank test
Fig. 3Systolic BP decrease in group II (nonPH-PADN) after PADN
Fig. 4Diastolic PAP during TXA2-induced PH modeling-2 in group I (PH-PADN) and group III (PH-shamPADN)
Summary of the lesions percentage in group I and group II. (mean ± SD)
| Lesion grade percentage (%) | Group I (PH-PADN) (n = 6) | Group II (nonPH-PADN) (n = 4) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| All lesions | 94.3 ± 49.8 | 110 ± 43.7 | 0.61 |
| Grade I | 20 ± 15 | 50 ± 13.5 | 0.038 |
| Grade II | 25.8 ± 8.6 | 30 ± 19 | 0.61 |
| Grade III | 45.8 ± 31.5 | 40 ± 8.7 | 0.9 |
| Grade II + III | 74 ± 35.7 | 60 ± 34.8 | 0.47 |
*Mann–Whitney U two-sided exact test
Fig. 5Macroscopic evaluation of RF-induced PA lesions: a. No lesions observed in the PA trunk, left and right PAs; b and c. Brown spots (arrows) depict PA wall hemorrhages and rough defects (4 mm-3 mm-2 mm in size); the asterisk corresponds to superficial dissection with intima detachment and media disorganization; d Macroscopic view of a RF-induced lesion at the PA trunk (circle) corresponds to coagulation necrosis of adventitia, perivascular fat and nerve fibers with intact underlying intima and media on further histological examination
Fig. 6Histological study of percutaneous RF-induced PA wall lesion: a Coagulation necrosis (asterisk) of adventitia with underlying unaltered nerve fiber (arrows), edema in 1/3 media (circle), × 50; b RF-induced dissection (arrow) with transmural PA wall lesion without underlying nerve fibers (asterisk), × 50