Literature DB >> 34921852

Comparison of untargeted and targeted perfluoroalkyl acids measured in adolescent girls.

Lauren M Petrick1, Mary S Wolff2, Dinesh Barupal2, Susan L Teitelbaum2.   

Abstract

Quantitative biomonitoring (e.g., targeted analysis) has served as the gold standard for environmental exposure biomonitoring for several decades. Recent advancements to broaden exposomic research brought new semi-quantitative untargeted assays that capture a wide range of endogenous metabolites and exogenous exposures in a single assay for discovery, though usually at the expense of absolute quantitation. The high-resolution mass spectrometers (HRMS) typically used in untargeted workflows are sensitive and robust, but there do not yet exist comprehensive comparisons between environmental chemicals at population exposure levels measured using targeted and untargeted assays. Using liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS, we measured per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) including perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHxS), n-perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), n-perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) in plasma of 180 girls from New York City, and compared them to previously obtained targeted measures using correlation and rank order methods. We showed high agreement between the methods with Spearman Rhos ranging from 0.69 to 0.92 and weighted Kappa's from 0.62 to 0.82 for tertiles among the PFAS. This finding demonstrates that semi-quantitative data from untargeted assays designed for exposomics can be reliably used to estimate environmental exposures occurring in the general population, providing an economic alternative to targeted assays. We also describe an approach that can be used to compare relative quantitation measurements from an untargeted assay to traditional targeted measures to establish fit-for-purpose usability and validation. These results suggest that environmental exposure measures from untargeted assays can serve as reliable inputs into statistical analysis for discovery and for determining their resultant biological impacts. Future efforts to develop new statistical approaches for standardization and merging with targeted measures-toward harmonization-will further enhance the utility of untargeted assays in environmental epidemiology.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomonitoring; Environment; Exposomics; PFAS; Quantile; Untargeted

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34921852      PMCID: PMC8770605          DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  37 in total

Review 1.  Toward Merging Untargeted and Targeted Methods in Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics and Lipidomics.

Authors:  Tomas Cajka; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  Evaluation of analytical performance of qualitative and semi-quantitative assays in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Joachim K W Pum
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 3.  A practical guide to validation and verification of analytical methods in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  Joachim Pum
Journal:  Adv Clin Chem       Date:  2019-03-09       Impact factor: 5.394

4.  Reference Standardization for Quantification and Harmonization of Large-Scale Metabolomics.

Authors:  Ken H Liu; Mary Nellis; Karan Uppal; Chunyu Ma; ViLinh Tran; Yongliang Liang; Douglas I Walker; Dean P Jones
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 6.986

5.  Global metabolic profiling of animal and human tissues via UPLC-MS.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Want; Perrine Masson; Filippos Michopoulos; Ian D Wilson; Georgios Theodoridis; Robert S Plumb; John Shockcor; Neil Loftus; Elaine Holmes; Jeremy K Nicholson
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 13.491

6.  An assessment of clinical laboratory performance for the determination of manganese in blood and urine.

Authors:  Meredith L Praamsma; Josiane Arnaud; David Bisson; Stuart Kerr; Chris F Harrington; Patrick J Parsons
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Perfluorinated chemicals in selected residents of the American continent.

Authors:  Antonia M Calafat; Larry L Needham; Zsuzsanna Kuklenyik; John A Reidy; Jason S Tully; Manuel Aguilar-Villalobos; Luke P Naeher
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 7.086

8.  Nontargeted quantitation of lipid classes using hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization mass spectrometry with single internal standard and response factor approach.

Authors:  Eva Cífková; Michal Holčapek; Miroslav Lísa; Magdaléna Ovčačíková; Antonín Lyčka; Frédéric Lynen; Pat Sandra
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Plasma metabolites associated with exposure to perfluoroalkyl substances and risk of type 2 diabetes - A nested case-control study.

Authors:  Tessa Schillemans; Lin Shi; Carolina Donat-Vargas; Kati Hanhineva; Andreas Tornevi; Ingegerd Johansson; Jani Koponen; Hannu Kiviranta; Olov Rolandsson; Ingvar A Bergdahl; Rikard Landberg; Agneta Åkesson; Carl Brunius
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 9.621

10.  Diet-Related Metabolites Associated with Cognitive Decline Revealed by Untargeted Metabolomics in a Prospective Cohort.

Authors:  Dorrain Yanwen Low; Sophie Lefèvre-Arbogast; Raúl González-Domínguez; Mireia Urpi-Sarda; Pierre Micheau; Melanie Petera; Delphine Centeno; Stephanie Durand; Estelle Pujos-Guillot; Aniko Korosi; Paul J Lucassen; Ludwig Aigner; Cécile Proust-Lima; Boris P Hejblum; Catherine Helmer; Cristina Andres-Lacueva; Sandrine Thuret; Cécilia Samieri; Claudine Manach
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 5.914

View more
  1 in total

1.  Marks and Mechanisms: Unraveling Potential Health Impacts of PFAS via DNA Methylation.

Authors:  Silke Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.