| Literature DB >> 34920751 |
Tanye Xu1,2, Guodao Li1, Xiaobo Wang3, Chongning Lv2,4, Yuanyong Tian1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a systemic disease mainly caused by the disorder of metabolism, which has become huge threat to human health. Polysaccharides are the main active substance from Inonotus obliquus (I. obliquus) with hypoglycemic effect. This study aims to evaluate the hypoglycemic activity and investigate the molecular mechanism of I. obliquus polysaccharide (IOP) in streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic mice using metabolomics based on UPLC-Q-Exactive-MS method.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetes; Hypoglycemic effect; Inonotus obliquus polysaccharide; Metabolomics; Molecular mechanism
Year: 2021 PMID: 34920751 PMCID: PMC8684258 DOI: 10.1186/s13065-021-00789-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Chem ISSN: 2661-801X
Fig. 1Effects of IOP on oral glucose tolerance test a at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120 min and area under curve b in the experimental mice
The levels of glucose, TCHO, TG, LDL-C and HDL-C in serum of mice
| Parameter (mmol/L) | Control | Model | Metformin | IOPH | IOPM | IOPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glucose | 5.34 ± 0.68 | 12.51 ± 1.3** | 7.57 ± 1.31**## | 8.59 ± 1.55**## | 10.41 ± 0..9**#▲▲ | 11.39 ± 1.55**▲▲ |
| TCHO | 2.87 ± 0.1 | 4.69 ± 0.39** | 3.24 ± 0.36## | 3.34 ± 0.39*## | 4.04 ± 0.25**#▲▲ | 4.3 ± 0.47**▲▲ |
| TG | 1.68 ± 0.12 | 3.08 ± 0.22** | 2.08 ± 0.31*## | 2.23 ± 0.42*## | 2.53 ± 0.42**# | 2.68 ± 0.31**#▲ |
| LDL-C | 0.47 ± 0.06 | 2.58 ± 0.28** | 1.24 ± 0.33**## | 1.15 ± 0.33**## | 1.51 ± 0.36**## | 1.74 ± 0.46**## |
| HDL-C | 1.04 ± 0.12 | 0.35 ± 0.09** | 0.81 ± 0.12*## | 0.77 ± 0.22*## | 0.59 ± 0.21** | 0.52 ± 0.11**#▲▲ |
VS control group, * means significant difference (p < 0.05); ** means extremely significant difference (p < 0.01)
VS model group, # means significant difference; ## means extremely significant difference
VS metformin group, ▲ means significant difference; ▲▲ means extremely significant difference
et sequentia
Fig. 2The PCA score plot of serum samples from C (control group), M (model group), and H (IOPH group)
Fig. 3OPLS-DA score plot of serum samples from C (control group) and M (model group)
Fig. 4A heat map demonstrating the trend of metabolites variation in C (control group) and M (model group)
Significant metabolites between C and M group
| No. | Rt/min | Ion mode | m/z | Formula | Metabolites | VIP | Fold change (M/C) | Related pathway |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.55 | [M + H] + | 90.05 | C3H7NO2 | 1.62 | 0.56# | Amino acid metabolism | |
| 2 | 0.55 | [M + H]+ | 116.07 | C5H9NO2 | 1.77 | 0.57 # | Amino acid metabolism | |
| 3 | 0.55 | [M + H]+ | 118.09 | C5H11NO2 | 1.93 | 0.71 # | Amino acid Metabolism | |
| 4 | 0.58 | [M-H]− | 167.02 | C5H4N4O3 | Uric acid | 2.07 | 2.06 # | Purine metabolism |
| 5 | 0.60 | [M + H]+ | 132.10 | C6H13NO2 | 3.62 | 0.49 # | Amino acid metabolism | |
| 6 | 0.66 | [M + H]+ | 166.09 | C9H11NO2 | 1.59 | 0.54 # | Amino acid metabolism | |
| 7 | 2.78 | [M + H]+ | 205.10 | C11H12N2O2 | 1.89 | 0.29 # | Amino acid metabolism | |
| 8 | 5.95 | [M + H]+ | 318.30 | C18H39NO3 | Phytosphingosine | 2.00 | 0.60 * | Lipid metabolism |
| 9 | 6.65 | [M + H]+ | 302.31 | C18H39NO2 | Sphinganine | 1.18 | 0.67 # | Lipid metabolism |
| 10 | 6.71 | [M + H]+ | 494.32 | C24H48NO7P | LysoPC(16:1(9Z)) | 1.68 | 1.69 * | Lipid metabolism |
| 11 | 6.90 | [M + H]+ | 544.34 | C42H80NO8P | LysoPC(20:4(8Z,11Z,14Z,17Z)) | 3.77 | 0.59 # | Lipid metabolism |
| 12 | 7.43 | [M-H]− | 319.23 | C20H32O3 | 12-HETE | 3.89 | 15.36 # | Fatty acid metabolism |
| 13 | 8.70 | [M-H]− | 303.23 | C20H32O2 | Arachidonic acid | 1.65 | 0.22 # | Fatty acid metabolism |
| 14 | 9.32 | [M + H]+ | 758.57 | C42H80NO8P | PC(20:1(11Z)/14:1(9Z)) | 8.72 | 0.42 * | Lipid metabolism |
| 15 | 13.13 | [M + H]+ | 815.70 | C47H95N2O6P | SM(d18:0/24:1(15Z)) | 1.79 | 2.38 # | Lipid metabolism |
*P < 0.05, #P < 0.01
Fig. 5A volcano plot of differential metabolites, seven marked metabolites with more than twofold change (|log2 FC|> 1) and P < 0.01 (− Log10 P > 2)
Fig. 7A set of boxcharts in three metabolites which significant changed in diabetic mice and regulated by IOP
Fig. 6A heat map demonstrating the trend of metabolites variation in M (model group) and H (IOPH group)
Fig. 8Pathway analysis of metabolite sets between control and model groups
Fig. 9The metabolic pathway network of the pathological processes of diabetes and the intervention of IOP on the molecular levels