Literature DB >> 34920161

In silico comparative analysis of KRAS mutations at codons 12 and 13: Structural modifications of P-Loop, switch I&II regions preventing GTP hydrolysis.

Michael Gerber1, Sanjay Goel2, Radhashree Maitra3.   

Abstract

KRAS mutation is prevalent in around 30% of all cancers and is an undruggable molecular target. Of seven mutations at codon 12 and 13, only one, the G12C mutant is finally proven to be druggable, as evidenced by the recent USFDA approval of sotorasib. Investigation of other small molecules targeting G12C and G12D are undergoing clinical trials. Understanding the fine structural details is a prerequisite to design specific inhibitors which also requires in depth molecular exploration. We used bioinformatics as a tool to analyze the KRAS protein's GTP (guanosine triphosphate) binding dynamics when mutated. KRAS undergoes significant conformational changes, affecting GTP binding conformation within the active site pocket of KRAS due to high torsional strains, hydrophobicity, and altered Switch I and II regions. GTP molecule for wildtype had a low torsional strain of 10.71, and is the only molecule, in comparison to KRAS mutant bound GTP, to have a glycine at position 10 interacting with its nitrogenous base. All mutant KRAS proteins lacked the interaction of glycine with the nitrogenous base. The binding affinity of wildtype (WT) KRAS for the gamma-phosphate was lower in scoring compared to the mutated KRAS protein in multiple analyses. This study provides an insight to the GTP-KRAS protein binding details that are important to define parameters required to be explored to design the appropriate inhibitor for each different type of mutant KRAS protein.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-structure; Codon 12 and 13; KRAS; Kinetics; Simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34920161      PMCID: PMC8810633          DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  20 in total

1.  OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins.

Authors:  Edward Harder; Wolfgang Damm; Jon Maple; Chuanjie Wu; Mark Reboul; Jin Yu Xiang; Lingle Wang; Dmitry Lupyan; Markus K Dahlgren; Jennifer L Knight; Joseph W Kaus; David S Cerutti; Goran Krilov; William L Jorgensen; Robert Abel; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading.

Authors:  Oleg Trott; Arthur J Olson
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.376

Review 3.  KRAS Alleles: The Devil Is in the Detail.

Authors:  Kevin M Haigis
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2017-09-12

4.  Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments.

Authors:  G Madhavi Sastry; Matvey Adzhigirey; Tyler Day; Ramakrishna Annabhimoju; Woody Sherman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.686

5.  Methods of protein structure comparison.

Authors:  Irina Kufareva; Ruben Abagyan
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  Clinical significance of the KRAS mutation.

Authors:  Sead Beganovic
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.363

7.  G12V Kras mutations in cervical cancer under virtual microscope of molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  X P Chen; W H Xu; D F Xu; S M Fu; Z C Ma
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.196

Review 8.  Targeting the untargetable KRAS in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Pingyu Liu; Yijun Wang; Xin Li
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 11.413

Review 9.  The current understanding of KRAS protein structure and dynamics.

Authors:  Tatu Pantsar
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Homology modeling and molecular dynamics dimulation study of β carbonic anhydrase of Ascaris lumbricoides.

Authors:  Mahima Yadav; Shikha Khandelwal
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2019-09-09
View more
  1 in total

1.  Deciphering Conformational Changes of the GDP-Bound NRAS Induced by Mutations G13D, Q61R, and C118S through Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamic Simulations.

Authors:  Zhiping Yu; Hongyi Su; Jianzhong Chen; Guodong Hu
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 4.927

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.