| Literature DB >> 34919571 |
Hiroyuki Nagano1, Jung-Ho Shin1, Tetsuji Morishita1, Daisuke Takada1, Susumu Kunisawa1, Kiyohide Fushimi2, Yuichi Imanaka1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The pandemic of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected health care systems globally. The aim of our study is to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of hospital admissions for ischemic stroke by severity in Japan.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34919571 PMCID: PMC8682905 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261587
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
The total number, characteristics, and time-sensitive treatment approaches of inpatient cases with ischemic stroke before and after the declaration of state of emergency.
| All hospitalized cases | Before the declaration of state of emergency | After the declaration of state of emergency | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of cases | 170,294 | 154,039 | 16,255 | |
| Age, y, median [IQR] | 78 [69–85] | 78 [69–85] | 78 [70–85] | 0.249 |
| Sex (male), n(%) | 97,532 (57.3) | 88,171 (57.2) | 9,361 (57.6) | 0.397 |
| JCS score at admission, n (%) | <0.001 | |||
| 0 | 82,353 (48.4) | 74,857 (48.6) | 7,496 (46.1) | |
| 1~3 | 67,436 (39.6) | 60,732 (39.4) | 6,704 (41.2) | |
| 10~300 | 20,505 (12.0) | 18,450 (12.0) | 2,055 (12.6) | |
| Severity at admission, n(%) | 0.022 | |||
| independent | 22,577 (13.3) | 20,517 (13.3) | 2,060 (12.7) | |
| dependent | 147,717(86.7) | 133,522(86.7) | 14,195(87.3) | |
| Treatment approach | ||||
| Intravenous thrombolysis, n(%) | 10,919 (6.4) | 9,836 (6.4) | 1083 (6.7) | 0.175 |
| Endovascular intervention, n(%) | 7,393 (4.3) | 6641 (4.3) | 752 (4.6) | 0.064 |
| Transfer to other facilities, n(%) | 54,744 (32.1) | 49,392 (32.1) | 5,352 (32.9) | 0.026 |
| Length of hospital stay, median days [IQR] | 19 [11–35] | 19 [11–36] | 18 [11–32] | <0.001 |
JCS: Japan Coma Scale, ADL: Activities of Daily Living, IQR: Interquartile Range.
Fig 1Result of the interrupted time series analysis for the weekly number of inpatients with ischemic stroke between April 1 2018 and June 27 2020.
Solid lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model, and dashed lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model in the scenario without the state of emergency.
Fig 2Result of the interrupted time series analysis for the weekly number of independent group inpatients with ischemic stroke between April 1 2018 and June 27 2020.
Solid lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model, and dashed lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model in the scenario without the state of emergency.
Fig 3Interrupted time series analysis for the weekly number of dependent group inpatients with ischemic stroke between April 1 2018 and June 27 2020.
Solid lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model, and dashed lines indicate the predicted trend based on a model in the scenario without the state of emergency.