OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL; Shockwave Medical) in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND: Severe CAC can be an arduous obstacle in interventional cardiology, often leading to suboptimal results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Coronary IVL is a novel technique that modulates severe CAC, thereby facilitating stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter observational study, data from 134 IVL procedures in 5 Belgian hospitals were prospectively obtained. Successful delivery of the IVL catheter was achieved in all cases but 1 (99.3%). The primary endpoint was final overall procedural success, which was obtained in 88.1% of cases, an aggregate of 92.6% in de novo lesions and 77.5% in stent underexpansion or in-stent restenosis (ISR). IVL therapy effect was considered successful by the operators in 94% of cases, with 68.7% achieving optimal and 25.3% achieving suboptimal results. The 1-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate was 3%, including 2 cardiovascular deaths (1 in-stent thrombosis and 1 coronary artery perforation). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world experience suggests that Shockwave IVL is a feasible, effective, and safe technique for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL; Shockwave Medical) in the treatment of severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) in a real-world setting. BACKGROUND: Severe CAC can be an arduous obstacle in interventional cardiology, often leading to suboptimal results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Coronary IVL is a novel technique that modulates severe CAC, thereby facilitating stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multicenter observational study, data from 134 IVL procedures in 5 Belgian hospitals were prospectively obtained. Successful delivery of the IVL catheter was achieved in all cases but 1 (99.3%). The primary endpoint was final overall procedural success, which was obtained in 88.1% of cases, an aggregate of 92.6% in de novo lesions and 77.5% in stent underexpansion or in-stent restenosis (ISR). IVL therapy effect was considered successful by the operators in 94% of cases, with 68.7% achieving optimal and 25.3% achieving suboptimal results. The 1-month major adverse cardiovascular event rate was 3%, including 2 cardiovascular deaths (1 in-stent thrombosis and 1 coronary artery perforation). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world experience suggests that Shockwave IVL is a feasible, effective, and safe technique for the treatment of heavily calcified coronary lesions.
Authors: Anthony J Buckley; John P McCormick; James Carey; Richard Armstrong; Andrew Maree; Mark Hensey; Stephen O'Connor; Ross Murphy; Caroline Daly; John Cosgrave; Ian Pearson Journal: Ir J Med Sci Date: 2022-07-09 Impact factor: 1.568