Nikhil V Kotha1,2,3, Abhishek Kumar2,3, Edmund M Qiao1,2,3, Alex S Qian1,3, Rohith S Voora1,2,3, Vinit Nalawade2,3, A Karim Kader4, Rana R McKay5, Tyler F Stewart5, Brent S Rose2,3. 1. School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 2. Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 4. Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 5. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: African American patients with bladder cancer have inferior outcomes compared with non-Hispanic White (White) patients. We hypothesize that access to health care is a primary determinant of this disparity. We compared outcomes by race for patients with bladder cancer receiving care within the predominant hybrid-payer health-care model of the United States captured in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with those receiving care within the equal-access model of the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: African American and White patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were identified in SEER and VHA. Stage at presentation, bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCM), and overall survival (OS) were compared by race within each health-care system. RESULTS: The SEER cohort included 122 449 patients (93.7% White, 6.3% African American). The VHA cohort included 36 322 patients (91.0% White, 9.0% African American). In both cohorts, African American patients were more likely to present with muscle-invasive disease and metastases, but the differences between races were statistically significantly smaller in VHA. In SEER multivariable models, African American patients had worse BCM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.29) and OS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.31). In contrast within the VHA, African American patients had similar BCM (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.07) and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of contrasting health-care models, receiving medical care in an equal-access system was associated with reduced differences in stage at presentation and eliminated disparities in survival outcomes for African American patients with bladder cancer. Our findings highlight the importance of reducing financial barriers to care to notably improve health equity and oncologic outcomes for African American patients.
BACKGROUND: African American patients with bladder cancer have inferior outcomes compared with non-Hispanic White (White) patients. We hypothesize that access to health care is a primary determinant of this disparity. We compared outcomes by race for patients with bladder cancer receiving care within the predominant hybrid-payer health-care model of the United States captured in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with those receiving care within the equal-access model of the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: African American and White patients diagnosed with bladder cancer were identified in SEER and VHA. Stage at presentation, bladder cancer-specific mortality (BCM), and overall survival (OS) were compared by race within each health-care system. RESULTS: The SEER cohort included 122 449 patients (93.7% White, 6.3% African American). The VHA cohort included 36 322 patients (91.0% White, 9.0% African American). In both cohorts, African American patients were more likely to present with muscle-invasive disease and metastases, but the differences between races were statistically significantly smaller in VHA. In SEER multivariable models, African American patients had worse BCM (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.29) and OS (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.31). In contrast within the VHA, African American patients had similar BCM (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.07) and OS (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.93 to 1.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of contrasting health-care models, receiving medical care in an equal-access system was associated with reduced differences in stage at presentation and eliminated disparities in survival outcomes for African American patients with bladder cancer. Our findings highlight the importance of reducing financial barriers to care to notably improve health equity and oncologic outcomes for African American patients.
Authors: C Daniel Mullins; Lisa Blatt; Confidence M Gbarayor; Hui-Wen Keri Yang; Claudia Baquet Journal: Am J Health Syst Pharm Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 2.637
Authors: Alexander P Cole; Sean A Fletcher; Sebastian Berg; Junaid Nabi; Brandon A Mahal; Guru P Sonpavde; Paul L Nguyen; Stuart R Lipsitz; Maxine Sun; Toni K Choueiri; Mark A Preston; Adam S Kibel; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-11 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Hude Quan; Vijaya Sundararajan; Patricia Halfon; Andrew Fong; Bernard Burnand; Jean-Christophe Luthi; L Duncan Saunders; Cynthia A Beck; Thomas E Feasby; William A Ghali Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Brent K Hollenbeck; Rodney L Dunn; Zaojun Ye; John M Hollingsworth; Cheryl T Lee; John D Birkmeyer Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860