| Literature DB >> 34917840 |
Marian Flis1, Bogusław Rataj2, Eugeniusz R Grela3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to carry out epizootic assessment of male roe deer to detect the presence of Cephenemyia stimulator larvae and determine the influence of the parasite on the carcass and antler weight in animals living in different habitats.Entities:
Keywords: Capreolus capreolus; Cephenemyia stimulator; parasites; roe deer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917840 PMCID: PMC8643081 DOI: 10.2478/jvetres-2021-0038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vet Res ISSN: 2450-7393 Impact factor: 1.744
Fig. 1Cephenemyia stimulator larvae in the nasal passages and throat of a culled male roe deer
Fig. 2Cephenemyia stimulator larvae collected for assessment and counting
Number of confirmed Cephenemyia stimulator parasites in male roe deer presented age and habitat
| Age | Habitat (ecosystem) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agro | Grassland | Forest | ||
| n (%) | 5 (33.3) | 3 (21.4) | 1 (7.1) | |
| mean | 1.6 | 1.7 | 1 | |
| 2 | min | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1 |
| max | 2.0 | 3.0 | 1 | |
|
| ||||
| n (%) | 4 (36.3) | 6 (50.0) | 3 (27.3) | |
| mean | 4.0 | 3.5 | 2.3 | |
| 3 | min | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| max | 7.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | |
|
| ||||
| n (%) | 1 (10.0) | 8 (61.5) | 2 (20.0) | |
| mean | 1 | 5.9 | 4.5 | |
| 4 | min | 1 | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| max | 1 | 12.0 | 5.0 | |
|
| ||||
| n (%) | 3 (27.3) | 4 (40.0) | 3 (30.0) | |
| mean | 7.0 | 6.3 | 3.3 | |
| 5 | min | 5.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| max | 11.0 | 14.0 | 5.0 | |
|
| ||||
| n (%) | 7 (53.8) | 8 (72.7) | 2 (16.7) | |
| mean | 6.0 | 4.0 | 2.5 | |
| ≥6 | min | 2.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| max | 12.0 | 7.0 | 3.0 | |
Male roe deer carcass weight presented habitat and presence of Cephenemyia stimulator parasites
| Habitat (ecosystem) | Item | Age (years) | Total/Mean | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ≥6 | ||||
| Non-infested | n | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 40 | |
| mean | 15.85 | 17.92a | 19.22 | 20.18a | 21.00a | 18.61a | ||
| Infested | n | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 20 | |
| Agro | mean | 14.40 | 15.87b | 17.62 | 18.16b | 18.35b | 16.88b | |
| Mean | 15.37x | 17.18 | 18.87xy | 19.64x | 19.57 | 18.02x | ||
| SEM | 0.92 | 0.69 | 1.24 | 1.06 | 1.41 | 1.12 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Non-infested | n | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 31 | |
| mean | 14.63 | 17.75a | 20.40a | 20.16a | 20.00a | 17.75 | ||
| Infested | n | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 29 | |
| Grassland | ||||||||
| mean | 15.00 | 15.91b | 17.12b | 18.25b | 18.50b | 17.18 | ||
| Mean | 14.71xy | 16.82 | 18.38x | 19.40x | 18.91 | 17.48xy | ||
| SEM | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.92 | 0.86 | 0.72 | 0.27 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Non-infested | n | 13 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 46 | |
| mean | 14.23 | 16.81a | 18.25a | 18.00 | 18.95 | 16.97 | ||
| Infested | n | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 | |
| Forest | ||||||||
| mean | 13.84 | 15.66b | 16.75b | 17.16 | 19.00 | 16.48 | ||
| Mean | 14.22y | 16.50 | 17.9550y | 17.75y | 18.96 | 16.86y | ||
| SEM | 0.65 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 1.42 | 2.10 | ||
SEM – standard error of the mean; a, b – mean values of carcass weight of infested and non-infested individuals within an ecosystem marked with different letters differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05; x, y– mean values of carcass weight of individuals from different ecosystems marked with different letters differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05
Gross antler weight of male roe deer presented by habitat and presence of Cephenemyia stimulator parasites
| Habitat (ecosystem) | Item | Age (years) | Total/Mean | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ≥6 | ||||
| Non-infested | n | 10 | 7 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 40 | |
| mean | 189.20a | 287.42 | 401.33a | 419.25 | 419.16 | 334.62 | ||
| Infested | n | 5 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 20 | |
| Agro | mean | 121.20b | 238.75 | 331.12b | 368.33 | 388.14 | 283.31 | |
| Mean | 166.53x | 269.73 | 394.31x | 405.36 | 402.46 | 318.10 | ||
| SEM | 20.54 | 16.25 | 31.24 | 25.44 | 17.14 | 18.12 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Non-infested | n | 11 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 31 | |
| mean | 163.27 | 294.66a | 404.60a | 421.33a | 480.00a | 308.22 | ||
| Grassland | Infested | n | 3 | 6 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 29 |
| mean | 155.00 | 223.66b | 323.00b | 327.50b | 398.37b | 306.48 | ||
| Mean | 161.50x | 259.17 | 354.38xy | 383.80 | 420.64 | 307.38 | ||
| SEM | 18.89 | 34.12 | 36.44 | 34.88 | 39.78 | 38.47 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Non-infested | n | 13 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 10 | 46 | |
| mean | 161.69 | 265.50 | 327.25a | 379.57a | 409.00 | 295.46 | ||
| Forest | Infested | n | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 11 |
| mean | 153.24 | 236.33 | 246.00b | 319.00b | 390.00 | 293.80 | ||
| Mean | 137.16y | 257.55 | 311.00y | 361.40 | 405.83 | 295.16 | ||
| SEM | 34.80 | 20.94 | 22.12 | 12.44 | 16.14 | 22.84 | ||
SEM – standard error of the mean; a, b – mean values of carcass weight of infested and non-infested individuals within an ecosystem marked with different letters differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05; x, y– mean values of carcass weight of individuals from different ecosystems marked with different letters differ significantly at P ≤ 0.05