Layana Biglow1, Sara Ashraf2, Mohamed Alsharedi2. 1. Department of Internal Medicine, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA. 2. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Marshall University, Edwards Comprehensive Cancer Center at Cabell Huntington Hospital, Huntington, WV, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the ongoing progress of effective treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mainly focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) as monotherapy and combination therapy. BACKGROUND: HCC in general has a poor prognosis; particularly in the advanced stage. For more than 10 years, the treatment with multikinase inhibitors was the first line treatment. Before the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors, very few treatments were available for patients with hepatocellular cancer in the advanced stage, especially in metastatic and unresectable disease. METHODS: We performed an extensive search of the ongoing and published clinical trials in the English written literature concerning of HCC with immune checkpoint inhibition when compared to first line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment paradigm for advanced stage HCC has significantly changed recently with the introduction of immunotherapy; based on existing research, there is new era for HCC treatment which will positively affect the outcome in a malignancy that did not see therapy advancement for more than a decade. Monoclonal antibodies against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab appear to be a promising therapeutic option in HCC. This review outlines immunotherapy that has been approved, and what inhibitors are under investigation for patients with advanced stage HCC. 2021 Stem Cell Investigation. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the ongoing progress of effective treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mainly focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPI) as monotherapy and combination therapy. BACKGROUND: HCC in general has a poor prognosis; particularly in the advanced stage. For more than 10 years, the treatment with multikinase inhibitors was the first line treatment. Before the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors, very few treatments were available for patients with hepatocellular cancer in the advanced stage, especially in metastatic and unresectable disease. METHODS: We performed an extensive search of the ongoing and published clinical trials in the English written literature concerning of HCC with immune checkpoint inhibition when compared to first line chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment paradigm for advanced stage HCC has significantly changed recently with the introduction of immunotherapy; based on existing research, there is new era for HCC treatment which will positively affect the outcome in a malignancy that did not see therapy advancement for more than a decade. Monoclonal antibodies against programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab appear to be a promising therapeutic option in HCC. This review outlines immunotherapy that has been approved, and what inhibitors are under investigation for patients with advanced stage HCC. 2021 Stem Cell Investigation. All rights reserved.
Authors: Caroline Robert; Georgina V Long; Benjamin Brady; Caroline Dutriaux; Michele Maio; Laurent Mortier; Jessica C Hassel; Piotr Rutkowski; Catriona McNeil; Ewa Kalinka-Warzocha; Kerry J Savage; Micaela M Hernberg; Celeste Lebbé; Julie Charles; Catalin Mihalcioiu; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Cornelia Mauch; Francesco Cognetti; Ana Arance; Henrik Schmidt; Dirk Schadendorf; Helen Gogas; Lotta Lundgren-Eriksson; Christine Horak; Brian Sharkey; Ian M Waxman; Victoria Atkinson; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard S Finn; Shukui Qin; Masafumi Ikeda; Peter R Galle; Michel Ducreux; Tae-You Kim; Masatoshi Kudo; Valeriy Breder; Philippe Merle; Ahmed O Kaseb; Daneng Li; Wendy Verret; Derek-Zhen Xu; Sairy Hernandez; Juan Liu; Chen Huang; Sohail Mulla; Yulei Wang; Ho Yeong Lim; Andrew X Zhu; Ann-Lii Cheng Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jeffrey Weber; Mario Mandala; Michele Del Vecchio; Helen J Gogas; Ana M Arance; C Lance Cowey; Stéphane Dalle; Michael Schenker; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Jean-Jacques Grob; Marcus O Butler; Mark R Middleton; Michele Maio; Victoria Atkinson; Paola Queirolo; Rene Gonzalez; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Michael Smylie; Nicolas Meyer; Laurent Mortier; Michael B Atkins; Georgina V Long; Shailender Bhatia; Celeste Lebbé; Piotr Rutkowski; Kenji Yokota; Naoya Yamazaki; Tae M Kim; Veerle de Pril; Javier Sabater; Anila Qureshi; James Larkin; Paolo A Ascierto Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2017-09-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Josep M Llovet; Sergio Ricci; Vincenzo Mazzaferro; Philip Hilgard; Edward Gane; Jean-Frédéric Blanc; Andre Cosme de Oliveira; Armando Santoro; Jean-Luc Raoul; Alejandro Forner; Myron Schwartz; Camillo Porta; Stefan Zeuzem; Luigi Bolondi; Tim F Greten; Peter R Galle; Jean-François Seitz; Ivan Borbath; Dieter Häussinger; Tom Giannaris; Minghua Shan; Marius Moscovici; Dimitris Voliotis; Jordi Bruix Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-07-24 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard S Finn; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Philippe Merle; Masatoshi Kudo; Mohamed Bouattour; Ho Yeong Lim; Valeriy Breder; Julien Edeline; Yee Chao; Sadahisa Ogasawara; Thomas Yau; Marcelo Garrido; Stephen L Chan; Jennifer Knox; Bruno Daniele; Scot W Ebbinghaus; Erluo Chen; Abby B Siegel; Andrew X Zhu; Ann-Lii Cheng Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2019-12-02 Impact factor: 44.544