| Literature DB >> 34917531 |
Xiaolan Zhao1, Yifang Xia2, Chunjing Li2, Dapeng Wang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of color Doppler ultrasound, multislice spiral CT combined with serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and alpha-fetoprotein heterogeneity (AFP-L3) in the diagnosis of primary hepatic carcinoma was evaluated.Entities:
Keywords: Alpha-fetoprotein receptor; Combination examination; Primary hepatic carcinoma; Ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917531 PMCID: PMC8643511 DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6806
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Public Health ISSN: 2251-6085 Impact factor: 1.429
Fig. 1:A: Two-dimensional ultrasound was shown an image of a tumor in the right lobe of the liver, with a size of about 7.7×6.52 cm, a round shape, low echo inside, and uneven distribution. The edges were relative clear, with the low halo surrounded.
B: Color doppler flow imaging (CDFI): it was shown blood flow signals around and inside the tumor, RI: 0.83
Comparison of blood flow grading in different lesions of PHC [n (%)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ≤5 cm | 45 | 6 (13.33) | 9 (20.00) | 19 (42.22) | 11 (24.45) |
| >5 cm | 42 | 0 (0) | 2 (4.76) | 9 (21.42) | 31 (73.82) |
| Χ2 | 6.015 | 4.567 | 4.304 | 21.201 | |
|
| 0.014 | 0.033 | 0.039 | 0.000 |
Note: aP<0.05
Intrahepatic lesion size and distribution showed on the CT images of 87 lesions in 79 patients with primary hepatic carcinoma
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Left lateral lobe of liver | Left medial lobe of liver | Right anterior lobe of liver | Right posterior lobe of liver | ||
| <1 | 8 | 0(0/10) | 10.53(2/19) | 8.33(1/12) | 10.87(5/46) |
| 1–3 | 15 | 10.00(1/10) | 15.79(3/19) | 16.67(2/12) | 19.57(9/46) |
| 3–5 | 22 | 20.00(2/10) | 26.32(5/19) | 33.33(4/12) | 23.91(11/46) |
| >5 | 42 | 70.00(7/10) | 47.36(9/19) | 41.67(5/12) | 45.65(21/46) |
Fig. 2:A: the arrow in the plain CT scan was pointed out an oval heterogeneous low-density lesions in the right lobe of the liver, with a diameter as about 6 cm; B: the arrow in the enhanced scan of the lesion in the arterial phase was pointed out the obvious uneven enhancement; C: the arrow was pointed out that the degree of enhancement at the portal venous phase decreased significantly; D: the arrow was indicated that the degree of enhancement during the delayed phase continued in declination
Comparison of serum expression levels of AFP and AFP-L3 in primary hepatic carcinoma and benign lesion groups [M (P25, P75)]
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary hepatic carcinoma Group | 79 | 101.12 (15.75, 121.23) | 19.50 (6.63, 23.42) |
| Benign lesion group | 50 | 13.23(8.21, 16.42) | 4.01 (2.26, 6.47) |
|
| 138.000 | 155.500 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.000 |
Note: bP<0.01
Fig. 3:ROC curve of PHC by AFP diagnosis
Fig. 4:ROC curve of PHC by AFP-L3 diagnosis
Efficacy evaluation on the ultrasound, CT, serum AFP and AFP-L3 single examination and combined examination for diagnosis of PHC [%(n/n)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound | 77.22(61/79) | 90.00(45/50) | 82.17(106/129) | 92.42(61/66) | 71.43(45/63) |
| CT | 75.95(60/79) | 92.00(46/50) | 82.17(106/129) | 93.75(60/64) | 70.77(46/65) |
| AFP | 65.82(52/79) | 84.00(42/50) | 72.87(94/129) | 86.67(52/60) | 60.87(42/69) |
| AFP-L3 | 64.56(51/79) | 88.00(44/50) | 73.64(95/129) | 89.47(51/57) | 61.11(44/72) |
| Combination examination | 96.20(76/79) | 82.00(41/50) | 90.70(117/129) | 89.41(76/85) | 93.18(41/44) |
| X2 | 27.858 | 3.082 | 17.511 | 2.246 | 16.202 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.544 | 0.002 | 0.691 | 0.003 |
Note: P<0.01