| Literature DB >> 34917286 |
Samuel Joseph1, Michael A Antwi1, Clarietta Chagwiza1, Theresa T Rubhara1.
Abstract
Climate change adaptation policies and strategies have inevitably become an integral component of agricultural production on a global scale. The evaluative extent to which these adaptation techniques have influenced agricultural productivity is inherently exiguous. Citrus production in tropical regions such as South Africa, is more vulnerable to climate change as the region already experience hot and dry climate, hence the need to implement different strategies for climate change adaption in these regions. This study was designed to assess the effect of adopting the following climate change adaptation measures: planting drought resistant varieties, rainwater harvesting, planting early maturing varieties, integrated pest management (IPM) , changing fertiliser type, and applying drip irrigation to manage climate challenges on the production efficiency of citrus farmers in the Limpopo province of South Africa. The stochastic frontier production function with Cobb Douglas production functional form was used to analyse the productivity of farmers' vis-à-vis adopted climate change strategies. A survey was conducted and data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire administered to respondents from 235 production units in the five district municipalities of Limpopo. The likelihood ratio tests for profit models showed that farmers were profit efficient considering the identified adaptation strategies. The variables that influenced profit efficiency was price of fertiliser (p < 0.010) and water cost (p < 0.010). The inefficiency model showed that besides changing fertiliser as an adaptation measure, the other adaptation strategies including IPM, water harvesting and planting drought resistant varieties did not change the profit efficiency of farmers. Therefore, the results indicate that citrus farmers can still adapt to climate change and remain profit efficient.Entities:
Keywords: adaptation strategies; climate change; profit efficiency; stochastic frontier production function; technical efficiency
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917286 PMCID: PMC8661275 DOI: 10.4102/jamba.v13i1.1093
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Jamba ISSN: 1996-1421
FIGURE 1Map of the Limpopo province.
Demographic and socioeconomic characteristic of respondents.
| Variable | Frequency ( | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Female | 9 | 4.1 |
| Male | 211 | 95.5 |
|
| ||
| ≤ 35 | 8 | 3.9 |
| 36–55 | 141 | 63.9 |
| 56–75 | 71 | 32.2 |
|
| ||
| ≤ 200 | 169 | 76.8 |
| 201–400 | 46 | 20.9 |
| 401–600 | 4 | 1.8 |
| 601–800 | 1 | 0.5 |
|
| ||
| ≤ 10 | 9 | 4.1 |
| 11–20 | 72 | 33.0 |
| 21–30 | 108 | 49.0 |
| 31–40 | 29 | 13.0 |
| 41–50 | 2 | 0.9 |
|
| ||
| Grapefruit, valencia, navel | 21 | 9.5 |
| Lemon, navel, valencia, grapefruit | 28 | 12.7 |
| Grapefruit, valencia, lemon | 152 | 69.1 |
| Grapefruit, valencia | 12 | 5.5 |
| Navel, valencia, lemon | 7 | 3.2 |
|
| ||
| Citrus Research International (CRI) | 195 | 88.6 |
| Experience | 15 | 6.8 |
| Extension officers | 8 | 3.6 |
| Media | 2 | 0.9 |
Climate change adaptation strategies adopted by citrus farmers.
| Adaptation strategies | Frequency ( | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| Planted drought resistant variety | 62 | 28.2 |
| Planted early maturity variety | 32 | 14.5 |
| Changed type of fertiliser | 16 | 7.3 |
| Applied IPM | 203 | 92.3 |
| Dams/harvested water/access to water right | 192 | 87.3 |
| Variety diversification | 34 | 15.5 |
| Applied drip irrigation | 173 | 78.6 |
IPM, integrated pest management.
Likelihood ratio test of hypothesis for profit efficiency model.
| Citrus farmers | Model 1 | Model 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Log likelihood | −165.096 | −162.978 |
|
| 220 | 220 |
| Assumption | Model 1 nested in model 2 | - |
| Likelihood ratio chi2(7) | 7.77 | - |
| Probability > chi2 |
| - |
Decision: Probability > chi2 = 0.3537 > 0.05; fail to reject null hypothesis that citrus farmers are fully profit efficient.
The Maximum Likelihood Estimates (MLE) results of the stochastic frontier profit function and adaptation strategies for citrus farmers in the Limpopo province.
| Model | Model (1) | Model (2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Coefficient | Standard error | Coefficient | Standard error | |||
|
| |||||||
| Constant |
| 1.476 | 0.720 | 0.041 | 1.291 | 0.729 | 0.077 |
| Ln (Agrochemical) ( |
| 0.114 | 0.139 | 0.410 | 0.152 | 0.139 | 0.276 |
| Ln (Cost of labour) ( |
| 0.146 | 0.124 | 0.241 | 0.124 | 0.122 | 0.311 |
| Ln (Farmland rent) ( |
| -0.002 | 0.006 | 0.704 | -0.003 | 0.006 | 0.621 |
| Ln (Price of fertilisers) ( |
| 0.380 | 0.103 | 0.000 | 0.386 | 0.102 | 0.000 |
| Ln (Cost of electricity) ( |
| 0.159 | 0.117 | 0.171 | 0.167 | 0.116 | 0.152 |
| Ln (Cost of water) ( |
| 0.365 | 0.060 | 0.000 | 0.343 | 0.061 | 0.000 |
|
| |||||||
| Constant |
| 0 | - | - | -0.915 | 0.526 | 0.082 |
| Drought resistant variety |
| 0 | - | - | 0.135 | 0.498 | 0.786 |
| Improved/early maturing cultivars |
| 0 | - | - | 0.400 | 0.552 | 0.469 |
| IPM |
| 0 | - | - | -0.285 | 0.472 | 0.545 |
| Change fertiliser type |
| 0 | - | - | -1.003 | 0.608 | 0.099 |
| Dam/harvesting rainwater |
| 0 | - | - | -0.146 | 0.431 | 0.735 |
| Variety diversification |
| 0 | - | - | -0.395 | 0.660 | 0.549 |
| Applied drip irrigation |
| 0 | - | - | 0.357 | 0.400 | 0.372 |
| Prob > chi2 | 0.000 | - | 0.000 | - | |||
| Log likelihood | -165.978 | - | -162.096 | - | |||
|
| 220 | - | 220 | - | |||
Assumption: Model 1 nested in Model 2. Likelyhood ratio chi2 (7) = 7.77, Probability > chi2 = 0.3537; Failed to reject null hypothesis.
IPM, integrated pest management.
, p < 0.10;
, p < 0.05;
, p < 0.01.