| Literature DB >> 34917183 |
Ciprian Tănăsescu1,2, Dragos Serban3,4, Andrei Moisin2, Carmen Popa2, Ramona Coca1,2, George Iancu5,6, Mihail Silviu Tudosie7,8, Daniel Ovidiu Costea9,10, Bogdan Socea3,11, Corneliu Tudor4, Gabriel Andrei Gangura3,12, Laura Carina Tribus13,14, Gabriel Catalin Smarandache3,4.
Abstract
Multimodal treatment of breast cancer has made steady progress in recent years. The involvement of modern oncology, diagnostic imaging techniques and surgical treatment, have brought a definite benefit to patients, defining the multidisciplinary treatment of breast cancer. The introduction of immunohistochemical testing and genetic screening has led to the prioritization of therapy according to their results and a correct approach to initiating treatment. The main aim of the present study was to conduct a comparative analysis through a retrospective study of the therapeutic means used in breast cancer with the statistical evaluation of the obtained results. To carry out the study, a group of 125 patients hospitalized during the period January 2015 to December 2020, were included, and the parameters were selected from the observation sheets. The results of the study demonstrated the superiority of multimodal treatment of breast cancer over surgical treatment as the only therapeutic management. The introduction of ultrasound-guided biopsies and conservative surgical options has led to increased diagnostic accuracy and a significant improvement in aesthetic outcome. The multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer allows an individualized treatment by performing immunohistochemical testing and through the use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment combined with conservative surgical techniques with a more favorable cosmetic and oncological result, with reduced postoperative complications.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; immunohistochemical analysis; multimodal therapy; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; outcomes; surgery
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917183 PMCID: PMC8630438 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2021.10979
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447