| Literature DB >> 34917006 |
Chunlan Jiao1, Xiangdong Shen2, Li Wang3.
Abstract
This research aims to investigate the influence of baby food e-store image (for ages 0-3) on consumers' purchase intention, mainly based on the stimulus-organism-response (S-O-R) model. Perceived value is additionally tested as a mediator of the relationship between baby food e-store image and consumers' purchase intention. An online questionnaire survey was conducted among consumers of baby food e-stores that specialize in ages 0-3. The final sample comprised 584 valid responses. To test the hypotheses in the relationships among latent variables, structural equation model analysis was used in this study. The findings showed that design image, order fulfillment image, communication service image, and security image of baby food e-stores have positive effects on consumers' perceived value, while perceived value mediates the relationship between baby food e-stores and consumers' purchase intention. As a result, more perceived value would be created between online stores and their consumers with a higher level of value. Two managerial implications derived from this study explain how to manage baby food e-stores and how to promote online baby food undertakings. Particularly, consumers' perceived emotional and functional value can be shaped by four dimensions of baby food e-store image, e-store design image, order fulfillment image, communication service image, and security image, which finally determines their purchase intentions. The originality and value of this study enriches the importance of consumers' perceived value in the field of online store image. Moreover, this study demonstrates that baby food e-store image increases consumers' perceived value and purchase intention.Entities:
Keywords: S-O-R framework; baby food e-store image; mediating effect; perceived value; purchase intention
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917006 PMCID: PMC8669135 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.796750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Conceptual framework.
Demographics of survey respondents (N = 584).
| Demographics | Category | Frequency | % |
| Gender | Male | 278 | 47.6 |
| Female | 306 | 52.4 | |
| Age | Below 20 | 42 | 7.2 |
| 21–30 | 262 | 44.9 | |
| 31–40 | 178 | 30.5 | |
| 41–50 | 71 | 12.2 | |
| 50 or above | 31 | 5.3 | |
| Occupation | Office worker | 113 | 19.3 |
| Civil servant | 142 | 24.3 | |
| Professional (Professor, Doctor, Lawyer, etc.) | 159 | 27.2 | |
| Homemaker | 77 | 13.2 | |
| Other | 93 | 15.9 | |
| Use frequency | Several times a day | 97 | 16.6 |
| Once per day | 91 | 15.6 | |
| Several times per week | 194 | 33.2 | |
| Several times per month | 167 | 28.6 | |
| Basically not used | 35 | 6.0 |
Results of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
| Construct | Indicator | Standard loading | Cronbach’sα | CR | AVE |
| E-store design image | EDI 1 | 0.791 | 0.873 | 0.873 | 0.697 |
| EDI 2 | 0.865 | ||||
| EDI 3 | 0.846 | ||||
| Order fulfillment image | OFI 1 | 0.898 | 0.866 | 0.870 | 0.691 |
| OFI 2 | 0.832 | ||||
| OFI 3 | 0.757 | ||||
| Communication service image | CSI 1 | 0.836 | 0.877 | 0.880 | 0.649 |
| CSI 2 | 0.853 | ||||
| CSI 3 | 0.692 | ||||
| CSI 4 | 0.830 | ||||
| Security image | SEI 1 | 0.773 | 0.821 | 0.822 | 0.606 |
| SEI 2 | 0.829 | ||||
| SEI 3 | 0.731 | ||||
| Emotional value | EMV 1 | 0.788 | 0.913 | 0.917 | 0.788 |
| EMV 2 | 0.946 | ||||
| EMV 3 | 0.921 | ||||
| Functional value | FUV1 | 0.790 | 0.863 | 0.863 | 0.613 |
| FUV 2 | 0.814 | ||||
| FUV 3 | 0.790 | ||||
| FUV 4 | 0.735 | ||||
| Purchase intention | PI 1 | 0.811 | 0.809 | 0.811 | 0.589 |
| PI 2 | 0.711 | ||||
| PI 3 | 0.777 |
χ
Results of discriminant validity testing.
| Construct | M | S.D. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| E-store design image | 4.193 | 1.943 |
| ||||||
| Order fulfillment image | 4.147 | 1.977 | 0.258 |
| |||||
| Communication service image | 4.680 | 1.766 | 0.208 | 0.116 |
| ||||
| Security image | 4.133 | 1.517 | 0.114 | 0.203 | 0.272 |
| |||
| Emotional value | 4.477 | 1.828 | 0.243 | 0.279 | 0.194 | 0.183 |
| ||
| Functional value | 3.475 | 1.821 | 0.345 | 0.335 | 0.197 | 0.228 | 0.152 |
| |
| Purchase intention | 3.717 | 1.580 | 0.216 | 0.177 | 0.287 | 0.301 | 0.326 | 0.333 |
|
Diagonal bold italics entries are square roots of AVE; all others are correlation coefficients. M, mean; SD, standard deviation.
Measures of the model fit.
| Fit index | RMSEA | GFI | CFI | NFI | TLI | |
| Recommended range | <3.84a | <0.08b | >0.90a | >0.90a | >0.90a | >0.90a |
| Model value | 2.917 | 0.057 | 0.902 | 0.941 | 0.913 | 0.932 |
RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; GFI, goodness of fit index; CFI, comparative fit index; NFI, normed fit index; TLI, non-normed fit index. a, According to
Results of hypotheses testing.
| Research hypothesis | Path value | S.E. | Support | ||
| H1-1: E-store design image → Emotional value | 0.149 | 0.040 | 3.712 |
| Yes |
| H1-2: E-store design image → Functional value | 0.223 | 0.041 | 5.501 |
| Yes |
| H2-1: Order fulfillment image → Emotional value | 0.212 | 0.045 | 4.674 |
| Yes |
| H2-2: Order fulfillment image → Functional value | 0.235 | 0.045 | 5.202 |
| Yes |
| H3-1: Communication service image → Emotional value | 0.123 | 0.046 | 2.677 | 0.007 | Yes |
| H3-2: Communication service image → Functional value | 0.101 | 0.045 | 2.252 | 0.024 | Yes |
| H4-1: Security image → Emotional value | 0.145 | 0.065 | 2.250 | 0.024 | Yes |
| H4-2: Security image → Functional value | 0.183 | 0.064 | 2.859 | 0.004 | Yes |
| H5: Emotional value → Purchase intention | 0.158 | 0.038 | 4.212 |
| Yes |
| H6: Functional value → Purchase intention | 0.212 | 0.039 | 5.388 |
| Yes |
*<0.05; **<0.01; and ***<0.001. n.s., not significant.
FIGURE 2Results of the research model tests. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001; n.s., non-significant at the 0.05 level.
Results of mediating effect analysis.
| Constructs | Mediator variables | Effect | SE | CIs | Hypothesis | |
| E-store design image | Emotional value | 0.060 | 0.014 | [0.035, 0.092] | 0.001 | H7-1 |
| Functional value | 0.089 | 0.018 | [0.058, 0.129] | 0.001 | H8-1 | |
| Order fulfilment image | Emotional value | 0.077 | 0.017 | [0.047, 0.113] | 0.001 | H7-2 |
| Functional value | 0.094 | 0.019 | [0.061, 0.136] | 0.001 | H8-2 | |
| Communication service image | Emotional value | 0.056 | 0.016 | [0.029, 0.092] | 0.001 | H7-3 |
| Functional value | 0.060 | 0.018 | [0.030, 0.099] | 0.001 | H8-3 | |
| Security image | Emotional value | 0.071 | 0.021 | [0.035, 0.120] | 0.001 | H7-4 |
| Functional value | 0.090 | 0.024 | [0.049, 0.144] | 0.001 | H8-4 | |
| 95% Bootstrap confidence intervals for indirect effect | ||||||
**p < 0.01.
| Construct & Item | |
| E-store design image | 1. The design of the online store left a good impression on me. |
| 2. The online store has detailed product introduction, picture displays, and purchase process. | |
| 3. The content news of the online store is updated from time to time. | |
| Order fulfillment image | 1. The online store promises to deliver goods in a short time. |
| 2. The online store offered “freight insurance” for customers. | |
| 3. The goods are received intact without damage. | |
| Communication service image | 1. The customer service staff of the online store are warm and polite. |
| 2. The customer service staff of the online store have sufficient professional knowledge. | |
| 3. The online store will consider accepting customers’ suggestions. | |
| 4. The online store will show concern to me in the form of SMS, telephone, e-mail, etc., | |
| Security image | 1. My personal information is confidential in this online store. |
| 2. Credit card and payment media information is secure. | |
| 3. The online store has a good reputation and can guarantee goods. | |
| Emotional value | 1. I feel happy when purchasing goods in this online store. |
| 2. I like to purchase the goods of the online store. | |
| 3. The goods in this online store can meet my spiritual needs. | |
| Functional value | 1. I can choose the right goods in this online store. |
| 2. The quality of the goods in this online store can be trusted. | |
| 3. The goods or services of the online store have practical value. | |
| 4. The quality of the goods in this online store is up to standard. | |
| Purchase intention | 1. I am more likely to buy in this online store than other stores. |
| 2. I will continue to buy goods in this online store. | |
| 3. I would recommend the goods and services of the online store to my relatives and friends. |