Literature DB >> 34916683

[Clinical characteristics of crystal deposits in joints and tendons in patients with gout].

Z Peng1, Y M Ding1, L Pei2, H H Yao1, X W Zhang1, S M Tang1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the abnormal manifestations and clinical features of patients with gout according to the location of crystal deposits: in articulars or in tendons.
METHODS: A total of 105 patients with gout who were continuously treated in the Department of Rheumatology and Immunology of Peking University People's Hospital from June 2019 to December 2019 were selected and their knees, ankles, toes and painful joints and tendons were examined by high-frequency ultrasound. Then we grouped them according to the presence or absence of sodium urate crystals and the location of the crystals, collected their clinical data, and analyzed the clinical characteristics.
RESULTS: Among the 105 patients, 25 patients had no crystal deposits in the joints or tendons (as the non-crystal group), 43 patients had intra-articular crystals (as the joint group), and 37 patients had intra-tendon crystals with or without intra-articular crystals (as the tendon group). Among them, the most involved part of sodium urate crystals deposited in the joints was the metatarsophalangeal joint (29 cases, 67.4%), followed by knee joints (10 cases, 23.2%), ankle joints (9 cases, 20.9%). The most involved part of sodium urate crystals deposited in the tendon was the quadriceps tendon (16 cases, 43.2%), followed by the Achilles tendon (13 cases, 35.1%), the patellar tendon (12 cases, 32.4%), and the three heads of brachii tendons (5 cases, 13.5%). The three groups were compared using multi-sample analysis of variance/multi-sample rank sum test. Age, age of first increase in uric acid (UA), serum glucose (Glu) level and C reactive protein (CRP) were all significantly different. After multiple comparisons, compared with the non-crystal group, age, the age of first increase in uric acid, and CRP were significantly higher in the tendon group. There was no significant difference between the non-crystal group and the joint group. There was no significant difference between the tendon group and the joint group.
CONCLUSION: In patients with gout, it is common for ultrasound to find crystals deposited in joints or tendons. The most commonly affected parts include the metatarsophalangeal joint, knee joint, ankle joint, quadriceps tendon, Achilles tendon, patellar tendon, and triceps tendon. There were significant differences among the three groups in age, age of first increase in uric acid, CRP and blood glucose, and the proportion of urinary calculi in patients with crystal deposits was significantly higher than those without crystal deposits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gout; Joint; Sodium urate crystal deposition; Tendon; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34916683      PMCID: PMC8695156     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban        ISSN: 1671-167X


  16 in total

Review 1.  Drivers of age-related inflammation and strategies for healthspan extension.

Authors:  Emily L Goldberg; Vishwa Deep Dixit
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.988

2.  EP4 receptor regulates collagen type-I, MMP-1, and MMP-3 gene expression in human tendon fibroblasts in response to IL-1 beta treatment.

Authors:  Bhavani P Thampatty; Hongxia Li; Hee-Jeong Im; James H-C Wang
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 3.  Hyperuricemia in Tendons.

Authors:  Isabel Andia; Michele Abate
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Ultrasound scans and dual energy CT identify tendons as preferred anatomical location of MSU crystal depositions in gouty joints.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Chang Liu; Xi Xiang; Tong-Ling Yuan; Li Qiu; Yi Liu; Yu-Bin Luo; Y Zhao; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  The unclosing premature mortality gap in gout: a general population-based study.

Authors:  Mark C Fisher; Sharan K Rai; Na Lu; Yuqing Zhang; Hyon K Choi
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 19.103

6.  Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout?

Authors:  Esperanza Naredo; Jacqueline Uson; Mercedes Jiménez-Palop; Agustín Martínez; Esther Vicente; Elia Brito; Ana Rodríguez; Francisco Javier Cornejo; Santos Castañeda; María Jesús Martínez; Jesús Sanz; Ingrid Möller; Enrique Batlle-Gualda; Jesús Garrido; Eliseo Pascual
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 19.103

7.  Gout and pseudo-gout-related crystals promote GLUT1-mediated glycolysis that governs NLRP3 and interleukin-1β activation on macrophages.

Authors:  Felix Renaudin; Lucie Orliaguet; Florence Castelli; François Fenaille; Aurelie Prignon; Fawaz Alzaid; Christele Combes; Aurélie Delvaux; Yasmina Adimy; Martine Cohen-Solal; Pascal Richette; Thomas Bardin; Jean-Pierre Riveline; Nicolas Venteclef; Frédéric Lioté; Laure Campillo-Gimenez; Hang-Korng Ea
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Gout.

Authors:  Nicola Dalbeth; Tony R Merriman; Lisa K Stamp
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Global epidemiology of gout: prevalence, incidence, treatment patterns and risk factors.

Authors:  Mats Dehlin; Lennart Jacobsson; Edward Roddy
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 10.  Gout and risk of chronic kidney disease and nephrolithiasis: meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Matthew J Roughley; John Belcher; Christian D Mallen; Edward Roddy
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 5.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.