You-Jung Choi1, Youngil Koh2, Hyun-Jung Lee3, In-Chang Hwang4, Jun-Bean Park1,5, Yeonyee E Yoon4,5, Hack-Lyoung Kim5,6, Hyung-Kwan Kim1,5, Yong-Jin Kim1,5, Goo-Yeong Cho4,5, Dae-Won Sohn1,5, Jin-Chul Paeng7, Seung-Pyo Lee3,5. 1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 2. Division of Hemato Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea; sproll1@snu.ac.kr. 4. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea. 5. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 6. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; and. 7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET/CT visualizes the amount of myocardial amyloid deposit and can be used to prognosticate patients with amyloid light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, whether 11C-PiB PET/CT has any independent additional prognostic value beyond the commonly used biomarkers remains unknown. Methods: This prospective study was on a cohort of 58 consecutive patients with AL CA who underwent 11C-PiB PET/CT. The patients were stratified into 2 groups on the basis of a visual assessment of whether there was myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT. The primary endpoint was 1-y overall mortality. The independent prognostic utility of 11C-PiB PET/CT was analyzed using net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement. Results: Among the 58 patients enrolled, 35 were positive for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT. Patients with myocardial 11C-PiB PET uptake had a worse 1-y overall survival rate than those without (81.8% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.003 by log-rank test). In the multivariate analysis, positivity for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT was an independent predictor of 1-y mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.382; 95% CI, 1.011-11.316; P = 0.048). In analysis of 3 subgroups of patients-those with a troponin I level of at least 0.1 ng/mL, those with an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level of at least 1,800 pg/mL, and those with a difference of at least 180 mg/L between free light chains (the 3 commonly used biomarkers and their thresholds for staging in AL amyloidosis)-Kaplan-Meier curves showed for all 3 subgroups that patients positive for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT had a worse prognosis than those who were negative. Additionally, when the results of 11C-PiB PET/CT were added to these 3 biomarkers, the performance of 1-y mortality prediction significantly improved by net reclassification improvement (troponin I, 0.861; NT-proBNP, 0.914; difference between free light chains, 0.987) and by integrated discrimination improvement (0.200, 0.156, and 0.108, respectively). Conclusion: 11C-PiB PET/CT is a strong independent predictor of 1-y overall mortality and provides incremental prognostic benefits beyond the 3 commonly used biomarkers of AL amyloidosis staging. Considering the recent development of numerous amyloid-targeting molecular imaging agents, further investigations are warranted on whether PET/CT should be included in risk stratification for patients with AL CA.
11C-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET/CT visualizes the amount of myocardial amyloid deposit and can be used to prognosticate patients with amyloid light-chain (AL) cardiac amyloidosis (CA). However, whether 11C-PiB PET/CT has any independent additional prognostic value beyond the commonly used biomarkers remains unknown. Methods: This prospective study was on a cohort of 58 consecutive patients with AL CA who underwent 11C-PiB PET/CT. The patients were stratified into 2 groups on the basis of a visual assessment of whether there was myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT. The primary endpoint was 1-y overall mortality. The independent prognostic utility of 11C-PiB PET/CT was analyzed using net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement. Results: Among the 58 patients enrolled, 35 were positive for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT. Patients with myocardial 11C-PiB PET uptake had a worse 1-y overall survival rate than those without (81.8% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.003 by log-rank test). In the multivariate analysis, positivity for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT was an independent predictor of 1-y mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.382; 95% CI, 1.011-11.316; P = 0.048). In analysis of 3 subgroups of patients-those with a troponin I level of at least 0.1 ng/mL, those with an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level of at least 1,800 pg/mL, and those with a difference of at least 180 mg/L between free light chains (the 3 commonly used biomarkers and their thresholds for staging in AL amyloidosis)-Kaplan-Meier curves showed for all 3 subgroups that patients positive for myocardial 11C-PiB uptake on PET/CT had a worse prognosis than those who were negative. Additionally, when the results of 11C-PiB PET/CT were added to these 3 biomarkers, the performance of 1-y mortality prediction significantly improved by net reclassification improvement (troponin I, 0.861; NT-proBNP, 0.914; difference between free light chains, 0.987) and by integrated discrimination improvement (0.200, 0.156, and 0.108, respectively). Conclusion: 11C-PiB PET/CT is a strong independent predictor of 1-y overall mortality and provides incremental prognostic benefits beyond the 3 commonly used biomarkers of AL amyloidosis staging. Considering the recent development of numerous amyloid-targeting molecular imaging agents, further investigations are warranted on whether PET/CT should be included in risk stratification for patients with AL CA.
Authors: Roberto M Lang; Luigi P Badano; Victor Mor-Avi; Jonathan Afilalo; Anderson Armstrong; Laura Ernande; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Steven A Goldstein; Tatiana Kuznetsova; Patrizio Lancellotti; Denisa Muraru; Michael H Picard; Ernst R Rietzschel; Lawrence Rudski; Kirk T Spencer; Wendy Tsang; Jens-Uwe Voigt Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Morie A Gertz; Ray Comenzo; Rodney H Falk; Jean Paul Fermand; Bouke P Hazenberg; Philip N Hawkins; Giampaolo Merlini; Philippe Moreau; Pierre Ronco; Vaishali Sanchorawala; Orhan Sezer; Alan Solomon; Giles Grateau Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Sharmila Dorbala; Yukio Ando; Sabahat Bokhari; Angela Dispenzieri; Rodney H Falk; Victor A Ferrari; Marianna Fontana; Olivier Gheysens; Julian D Gillmore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Mazen A Hanna; Bouke P C Hazenberg; Arnt V Kristen; Raymond Y Kwong; Mathew S Maurer; Giampaolo Merlini; Edward J Miller; James C Moon; Venkatesh L Murthy; C Cristina Quarta; Claudio Rapezzi; Frederick L Ruberg; Sanjiv J Shah; Riemer H J A Slart; Hein J Verberne; Jamieson M Bourque Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2019-08-29 Impact factor: 6.592
Authors: Nisha Arenja; Florian Andre; Johannes H Riffel; Fabian Aus dem Siepen; Ute Hegenbart; Stefan Schönland; Arnt V Kristen; Hugo A Katus; Sebastian J Buss Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 5.364