| Literature DB >> 34915846 |
Heavenlight Christopher1, Adam Burns2, Anna Schuh3,2, Siana Nkya3,4, Emmanuel Josephat3, Julie Makani3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an important cause of under-five mortality. Tanzania is the 5th country in the world with the highest births prevalence of SCD individuals. Significant advances in the neonatal diagnosis of SCD using rapid point-of-care testing have been made. However genetic confirmation is still required for positive cases, in uncertain cases, in multiply transfused patients, to resolve compound heterozygosity (Hb S/ β0 Thal or Hb S/ β+ thal) not uncommon in the coastal regions of East Africa and increasingly also for pre-marital counselling and potentially for future curative approaches such as gene therapy. The currently available DNA tests are prohibitively expensive. Here, we describe an easy-to-use, affordable and accurate β-globin sequencing approach that can be easily integrated within existing NBS for SCD and other haemoglobinopathies especially in Low- and Middle-income Countries. AIM: To evaluate an affordable DNA technology for the diagnosis of Sickle cell disease and other haemoglobinopathies in a resource-limited setting.Entities:
Keywords: Comprehensive care; DNA sequencing; Haemoglobinopathies; Nanopore; Newborn screening; Sickle cell disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34915846 PMCID: PMC8679995 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-08220-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Details of the experimental methods used for both validation and discovery cohorts. A The validation cohort was selected for a mixture of confirmed clinical diagnoses and both WB and DBS sources. The discovery cohort comprised 9 dB and 12 WB samples. B Samples were prepared for sequencing according to DNA source and sequenced on a MinION mk1b instrument. The resulting sequencing reads were processed locally using a pipeline designed to identify constitutional variants in the β-globin gene. SCH = Sickle Cell Heterozygote, B + TH = Beta Thalassaemia Heterozygote, BTI = Beta Thalassaemia Intermedia, SCD = Sickle Cell Disease
Patient characteristics of the validation cohort. Blood samples are not routinely taken for FBC or HPLC as part of newborn SCD screening. ‘- ‘= data not collected
| Sample ID | Sample Type | Age | Sex | Hb (g/dl) | MCV (fl) | Hb S | Hb A | Hb F | Hb A2 | Diagnosis from standard test (genetic or IEF) | Concordance with Nanopore sequencing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FH | WB | 21 | F | 12.4 | 78.8 | 36.3 | 55.8 | 3.3 | 3.3 | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| G213707J | WB | 30 | F | 10.9 | 51.4 | – | 80.9 | 1.1 | 7.8 | Beta+ Thal heterozygote | yes |
| G213708H | WB | 33 | M | 11.4 | 47.2 | – | 81.3 | 1.2 | 6.7 | Beta+ Thal heterozygote | yes |
| G213709R | WB | 5 | F | 7.9 | 47.3 | – | 1.7 | 97.9 | 3.8 | Beta Thal intermedia | yes |
| G213711L | WB | – | F | 10.5 | 47.0 | – | 80.7 | 9.8 | 6.5 | Beta+ Thal heterozygote | yes |
| Z | WB | 5 | F | 8.5 | 74.8 | 38.2 | 51.2 | 5.6 | 3.6 | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1196 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 14.2 | 0.0 | 74.8 | 1.6 | Sickle cell disease | yes |
| TMK 1258 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 5.3 | 6.6 | 82.0 | – | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1259 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 4.8 | 7.4 | 80.6 | – | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1260 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 8.1 | 13.0 | 69.1 | 0.5 | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1267 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 3.8 | 4.6 | 83.5 | 1.3 | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1276 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 9.5 | 16.8 | 62.7 | 0.8 | Sickle cell heterozygote | yes |
| TMK 1287 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 12.4 | 0.0 | 80.6 | 0.5 | Sickle cell disease | yes |
| TMK 1345 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | 12.2 | 0.0 | 78.9 | 1.4 | Sickle cell disease | yes |
| TMK 1536 | DBS | Newborn | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | Sickle cell disease | yes |
Summary of all non-synonymous variants obtained through conventional screening methods, confirmatory Sanger Sequencing, and nanopore sequencing
| Sample ID | Sample Type | Cohort | Results from conventional screening | Results of nanopore sequencing | Final Diagnosis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | Result | Mutation | Read Depth (x) | VAF | Het/Hom | ||||
| FH | WB | Val | Sanger | Glu7Val (Het) | Glu7Val | 1645 | 0.46 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| G213707J | WB | Val | Sanger | Met1Thr (Het) | Met1Thr | 49,715 | 0.56 | Het | Beta+ thal heterozygote |
| G213708H | WB | Val | Sanger | Met1Thr (Het) | Met1Thr | 43,165 | 0.44 | Het | Beta+ thal heterozygote |
| G213709R | WB | Val | Sanger | Met1Thr (Hom) | Met1Thr | 80,434 | 0.77 | Hom | Beta+ thal intermedia |
| G213711L | WB | Val | Sanger | Met1Thr (Het) | Met1Thr | 127,405 | 0.41 | Het | Beta+ thal heterozygote |
| Z | WB | Val | Sanger | Glu7Val (Het) | Glu7Val | 4744 | 0.50 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1196 | DBS | Val | IEF | FS | Glu7Val | 91,193 | 0.81 | Hom | Sickle cell disease |
| TMK-1258 | DBS | Val | IEF | FAS | Glu7Val | 118,680 | 0.45 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1259 | DBS | Val | IEF | FAS | Glu7Val | 46,389 | 0.55 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1260 | DBS | Val | IEF | FAS | Glu7Val | 32,431 | 0.55 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1267 | DBS | Val | IEF | FAS | Glu7Val | 38,726 | 0.55 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1276 | DBS | Val | IEF | FAS | Glu7Val | 41,793 | 0.53 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| TMK-1287 | DBS | Val | IEF | FS | Glu7Val | 86,884 | 0.95 | Hom | Sickle cell disease |
| TMK-1345 | DBS | Val | IEF | FS | Glu7Val | 17,534 | 0.85 | Hom | Sickle cell disease |
| TMK-1536 | DBS | Val | IEF | FS | Glu7Val | 33,070 | 0.93 | Hom | Sickle cell disease |
| Sample 144 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | c.92 + 1G > A | 5849 | 0.44 | Het | Beta+ Thal, Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Glu7Val | 5845 | 0.48 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 245 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Trp38X | 5817 | 0.40 | Het | Beta+ Thal, Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Glu7Val | 6023 | 0.48 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 462 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Gln40X | 5934 | 0.47 | Het | Beta+ Thal, Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Glu7Val | 5969 | 0.46 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 647 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Glu7Val (Het) | Glu7Val | 11,078 | 0.49 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Sample 693 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Glu7Val (Het) | Glu7Val | 5967 | 0.51 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Sample 926 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Glu7Val (Hom) | Glu7Val | 6700 | 0.99 | Hom | Sickle cell disease |
| Sample 040 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu7Val | 4847 | 0.45 | Het | Sickle cell, Beta+ Thal heterozygote. |
| Glu23X | 4787 | 0.44 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 1077 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu 7Val | 3741 | 0.46 | Het | Sickle cell, Beta+ Thal heterozygote. |
| Glu23X | 3688 | 0.44 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 1221 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu7Val | 3287 | 0.45 | Het | Sickle cell, Beta+ Thal heterozygote. |
| Glu23X | 3258 | 0.45 | Het | ||||||
| Sample 832 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu7Val | 3806 | 0.48 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
| Sample 750 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu7Val | 3619 | 0.47 | Het | Sickle cell, Beta+ Thal heterozygote. |
| C.92 + 1G > T | 2169 | Het | |||||||
| Sample 1181 | WB | Disc | Sanger | Beta+ Thal | Glu7val | 3111 | 0.46 | Het | Sickle cell heterozygote |
WB Whole blood, DBS Dried blood spot, Val Validation, Disc Discovery, IEF Isoelectric focussing, Het Heterozygous mutation, Hom Homozygous mutation, VAF Variant allele frequency
Fig. 2Mutations in the β-globin gene can be accurately phased across multiple exons due to long-read nanopore sequencing. Top: The c.92 + 1G > A variant in sample 144 is phased with the wild-type allele at the Glu7 residue. Centre and bottom: In both samples 245 and 462, the stop-gain variant is in phase with the wild-type allele at Glu7
Cost analysis of sickle cell and β-thal screening by nanopore sequencing. Cost estimates are based on 24 samples per library, and 8 libraries sequenced per flowcell
| Item | Reactions per item | Cost per reaction | No. required per sample | Cost/test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QiAmp DNA blood mini kit | 250 | £1.86 | 1 | £1.86 |
| Enrichment Step 1 | 200 | £0.72 | 1 | £0.72 |
| Enrichment Step 2 | 1000 | £0.93 | 2 | £1.86 |
| Enrichment Step 3 | 50 | £9.24 | 0.04 | £0.41 |
| PCR barcoding kit | 960 | £1.42 | 1 | £1.42 |
| Ligation sequencing kit | 6 | £80.00 | 0.04 | £3.33 |
| SpotON flowcell | 192 | £1.98 | 1 | £1.98 |
ONT Oxford Nanopore Technologies