Literature DB >> 3491533

Relationships between usual nutrient intake and bone-mineral content of women 35-65 years of age: longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis.

J L Freudenheim, N E Johnson, E L Smith.   

Abstract

In a 4-yr clinical trial, effect on single-photon absorptiometric measurements of arm bones of usual intakes of energy and 14 nutrients plus vitamin-mineral supplements was studied in 99 women, aged 35-65, randomly assigned to placebo (NS) or calcium-supplemented (1.5 g)(S) groups. Cross-sectional analysis of initial bone measurements showed vitamin C (r = 0.313, p less than 0.05) and niacin (r = 0.353, p less than 0.01) correlated with ulna in postmenopausal subjects (n = 67). Longitudinal analysis of bone-change rates of postmenopausal subjects (NS + S) showed higher calcium intakes associated with lower loss rates of humerus bone-mineral content (BMC) (r = 0.360, p less than 0.01). In postmenopausal NS but not S subjects, energy, protein, calcium, phosphorus, zinc, and folate correlate significantly with change in radius BMC; high levels of intake correlated with slower loss (p less than 0.05). Several nutrients besides calcium are related to bone loss in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3491533     DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/44.6.863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0002-9165            Impact factor:   7.045


  35 in total

Review 1.  Minerals and osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Rico
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 2.  Calcium supplementation of the diet: justified by present evidence.

Authors:  B E Nordin; R P Heaney
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-04-21

3.  Dietary protein intake and bone mass in women.

Authors:  C Cooper; E J Atkinson; D D Hensrud; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs; L J Melton
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Dietary Approaches for Bone Health: Lessons from the Framingham Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  Shivani Sahni; Kelsey M Mangano; Robert R McLean; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Magnesium intake, bone mineral density, and fractures: results from the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Tonya S Orchard; Joseph C Larson; Nora Alghothani; Sharon Bout-Tabaku; Jane A Cauley; Zhao Chen; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Rebecca D Jackson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 6.  The calcium controversy: finding a middle ground between the extremes.

Authors:  R P Heaney
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 7.  Skeletal effects of nutrients and nutraceuticals, beyond calcium and vitamin D.

Authors:  J W Nieves
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Biochemical markers of nutrition in osteoporosis.

Authors:  H Rico; P Relea; M Revilla; E R Hernandez; I Arribas; L F Villa
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 9.  Optimizing peak bone mass: what are the therapeutic possibilities?

Authors:  S Adami
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Enhancement of calcium/vitamin d supplement efficacy by administering concomitantly three key nutrients essential to bone collagen matrix for the treatment of osteopenia in middle-aged women: a one-year follow-up.

Authors:  Priscilla G Masse; Jean-Luc Jougleux; Carole C Tranchant; Juliana Dosy; Marcel Caissie; Stephen P Coburn
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 3.114

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.