Literature DB >> 34915084

The accuracy of various neuro-prognostication algorithms and the added value of neurofilament light chain dosage for patients resuscitated from shockable cardiac arrest: An ancillary analysis of the ISOCRATE study.

Caroline Pouplet1, Gwenhael Colin2, Elie Guichard3, Jean Reignier4, Amélie Le Gouge5, Stéphanie Martin6, Jean-Claude Lacherade7, Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In current guidelines, neurological prognostication after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is based on a multimodal approach bundled in algorithms. Biomarkers are of particular interest because they are unaffected by interpretation bias. We assessed the predictive value of serum neurofilament light chains (NF-L) in patients with a shockable rhythm who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and evaluated the predictive value of a modified algorithm where NF-L dosage is included.
METHODS: All patients who were included participated in the randomized ISOCRATE trial. NF-L values 48 h after ROSC were compared for patients with a good (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1 or 2) and a poor prognosis (CPC 3 to 5 or death). The benefit of adding NF-L dosage to the current guideline algorithm was then assessed for NF-L thresholds of 500 and 1,200 pg/ml as previously described.
RESULTS: NF-L was assayed for 49 patients. In patients with good versus those with poor outcomes, median NF-L values at 48 h were 72 ± 78 and 7,755 ± 9,501 pg/ml respectively (P < 0.0001; AUC [95 %CI] = 0.87 [0.74;0.99]). The sensitivity of the modified ESICM/ERC 2021 algorithm after adding NF-L with thresholds of 500 and 1,200 pg/ml was 0.74 (CI 95% 0.51-0.88) and 0.68 (CI 95% 0.46-0.86), respectively, versus 0.53 (CI 95% 0.32-0.73) for the unmodified algorithm. In three instances the specificity was 1.
CONCLUSION: High NF-L plasma levels 48 h after cardiac arrest was significantly associated with a poor outcome. Adjunction to the current guideline algorithm of an NF-L assay with a 500 pg/ml threshold 48 h after cardiac arrest provided the best sensitivity compared to the algorithm alone, while specificity remained excellent.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Cardiac arrest; Pronostication

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34915084     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.12.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  2 in total

1.  External validation of the 2020 ERC/ESICM prognostication strategy algorithm after cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Chun Song Youn; Kyu Nam Park; Soo Hyun Kim; Byung Kook Lee; Tobias Cronberg; Sang Hoon Oh; Kyung Woon Jeung; In Soo Cho; Seung Pill Choi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  Outcomes of mild-to-moderate postresuscitation shock after non-shockable cardiac arrest and association with temperature management: a post hoc analysis of HYPERION trial data.

Authors:  Ines Ziriat; Aurélie Le Thuaut; Gwenhael Colin; Hamid Merdji; Guillaume Grillet; Patrick Girardie; Bertrand Souweine; Pierre-François Dequin; Thierry Boulain; Jean-Pierre Frat; Pierre Asfar; Bruno Francois; Mickael Landais; Gaëtan Plantefeve; Jean-Pierre Quenot; Jean-Charles Chakarian; Michel Sirodot; Stéphane Legriel; Nicolas Massart; Didier Thevenin; Arnaud Desachy; Arnaud Delahaye; Vlad Botoc; Sylvie Vimeux; Frederic Martino; Jean Reignier; Alain Cariou; Jean Baptiste Lascarrou
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 10.318

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.