Literature DB >> 34914058

Construction of Novel Live Genetically Modified BCG Vaccine Candidates Using Recombineering Tools.

Mario Alberto Flores-Valdez1, Michel de Jesús Aceves-Sánchez2.   

Abstract

One of the strategies for the construction of live vaccine candidates is through the generation of genetically defined isogenic strains, containing single or multiple mutations in target-specific genes generated by allelic exchange. This approach allows to produce rational attenuation of or, alternatively, sequence-specific modifications to produce variants of antigenic molecules or change their expression levels. Genetic tools amenable for their use in mycobacterial strains have allowed the identification and validation of potential targets for the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of tuberculosis. However, the genetic manipulation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and other slow-growing strains such as Mycobacterium bovis BCG has been delayed by various factors related to their physiology and cell wall characteristics. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the high frequency of illegitimate recombination and the availability of few antibiotic selection markers limit the feasibility of genetic manipulation of mycobacterial strains. This chapter describes a protocol for the generation of defined mutants using recombination tools in an inducible recombination system driven by mycobacterial Che9c phage RecET proteins, originally developed in Dr. Graham Hatfull's group, combined with linearized recombination substrates containing flanking sequences of a locus of interest and an antibiotic resistance gene. These recombination substrates contain sites for removal of antibiotics selection markers. This system allows to make marked and unmarked mutations by homologous recombination in a single step as a result of a double crossover between the homologous regions on the genome and the allelic exchange substrate. In addition, this genetic tool used for engineering mycobacterial genomes performs with lower rates of illegitimate recombination and take on average less time to create knock-out (KO) mutant compared with other techniques.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gene replacement; Homologous recombination; Mutation; Recombineering; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34914058     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1884-4_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  26 in total

1.  Electroporation of mycobacteria.

Authors:  Renan Goude; Tanya Parish
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

Review 2.  The molecular genetics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  G F Hatfull
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 3.  Recombination in mycobacteria.

Authors:  J McFadden
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Insertional mutagenesis and illegitimate recombination in mycobacteria.

Authors:  G V Kalpana; B R Bloom; W R Jacobs
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The uraA locus and homologous recombination in Mycobacterium bovis BCG.

Authors:  A Aldovini; R N Husson; R A Young
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  A guide to Mycobacterium mutagenesis.

Authors:  Katlyn Borgers; Kristof Vandewalle; Nele Festjens; Nico Callewaert
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2019-08-26       Impact factor: 5.542

7.  Introduction of foreign DNA into mycobacteria using a shuttle phasmid.

Authors:  W R Jacobs; M Tuckman; B R Bloom
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Jun 11-17       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Efficient point mutagenesis in mycobacteria using single-stranded DNA recombineering: characterization of antimycobacterial drug targets.

Authors:  Julia C van Kessel; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 9.  The molecular biology of recombination in Mycobacteria: what do we know and how can we use it?

Authors:  D G Niranjala Muttucumaru; Tanya Parish
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.081

10.  Mechanism of transformation in Mycobacteria using a novel shockwave assisted technique driven by in-situ generated oxyhydrogen.

Authors:  Akshay Datey; Janardhanraj Subburaj; Jagadeesh Gopalan; Dipshikha Chakravortty
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.