Literature DB >> 34913717

Complete Genome Sequences of Kinneretia sp. Strain XES5, Shinella sp. Strain XGS7, and Vogesella sp. Strain XCS3, Isolated from Xenopus laevis Skin.

D T Hudson1,2, P A Chapman1, R C Day3, X C Morgan2, C W Beck1.   

Abstract

Here, we report the genome sequences of three bacterial isolates, Kinneretia sp. strain XES5, Shinella sp. strain XGS7, and Vogesella sp. strain XCS3, which were cultured from skin of adult female laboratory-bred Xenopus laevis.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34913717      PMCID: PMC8675264          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.01050-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Xenopus laevis (African clawed frog) is a widely used model for gene expression, vertebrate development, regeneration, and disease (1–6). We have isolated a collection of Xenopus-associated bacterial isolates as part of research on tadpole regeneration (6). This report presents complete genomes for Kinneretia sp. strain XES5, Shinella sp. strain XGS7, and Vogesella sp. strain XCS3. To date, genomes from only 2 Kinneretia, 17 Shinella, and 9 Vogesella species are available from the RefSeq database; many were isolated from aquatic environments (7–17), consistent with the habitat of X. laevis. Isolates were collected from the skin of captive-bred adult female X. laevis frogs from the University of Otago Xenopus colony. These Xenopus frogs are housed in a mains-water-recirculating aquarium system and fed twice weekly with salmon pellets. Aseptically collected swab samples were plated on Oxoid nutrient agar and incubated at 30°C for 48 h, and colonies were purified by streaking. Default parameters were used for sequencing and assembly unless otherwise noted. Sequencing quality data are summarized in Table 1. For sequencing of each isolate, single colonies were streaked on a plate. From this plate, approximately 20 individual colonies were picked and placed in lysis buffer. Isolate DNA was then extracted using a Presto Mini genomic DNA (gDNA) bacteria kit. This DNA was used for both Nanopore and Illumina sequencing. Nanopore libraries were prepared with a rapid barcoding kit (SQK-RBK004; Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT]) and sequenced using a GridION system (flow cell R9.4.1). Demultiplexing and base calling used Guppy (v4.3.4). Porechop (v0.2.4) (18) and Filtlong (v0.2.1) (--keep_percent 95) (19) were used to trim adapters and filter reads.
TABLE 1

Summary of isolate characteristics and most closely related strains by ANI

ParameterData for:
Kinneretia sp. strain XES5Shinella sp. strain XGS7Vogesella sp. strain XCS3
Genome size (bp)
 Total5,810,9385,248,8303,889,382
 Chromosome4,026,6714,025,5073,724,844
 Plasmid(s)895,176, 733,869, 102,922, 33,339, 18,96169,886, 18,961164,538
G+C content (%)686460
CheckM completeness (%)99.6810099.57
CheckM contamination (%)0.390.580.11
No. of protein-coding genes5,4664,5873,570
No. of RNA genes65 (3 rRNA operons)93 (6 rRNA operons)136 (9 rRNA operons)
BioSample accession no. SAMN21437801 SAMN21437802 SAMN21437800
SRA accession no.SRR15901072, SRR15901073, SRR15901074SRR15901069, SRR15901070, SRR15901071, SRR15901077SRR15901075, SRR15901076, SRR15901078, SRR15901079
GenBank accession no. GCA_020535545.1 GCA_020535565.1  GCA_020616155.1
Landcare accession no.ICMP 24357 ICMP 24358ICMP 24364
No. of Illumina reads1,074,0011,807,7491,028,939
No. of Nanopore reads63,88182,808389,151
Genome coverage (×)
 Illumina6798106
 Nanopore85107347
 Total152205453
Nanopore read N50 (bp)13,68315,0206,172
Most closely related genomes (ANI [%])Kinneretia asaccharophila DSM 25082 (7) (GenBank accession no. ASM436240v1) (89.91), Kinneretia sp. strain DAIF2 (8) (GenBank accession no. ASM1562442v1) (85.83), Mitsuaria sp. strain WAJ17 (GenBank accession no. ASM1417451v1) (81.87), Pelomonas sp. strain KK5 (34) (GenBank accession no. ASM198409v1) (81.32), Mitsuaria sp. strain TWR114 (35) (GenBank accession no. ASM799734v1) (81.17)Shinella zoogloeoides DSM 287 (GenBank accession no. ASM982685v1) (88.53), Shinella zoogloeoides PQ7 (GenBank accession no. ASM357462v1) (87.88), Shinella sp. strain PSBB067 (GenBank accession no. ASM1683914v1) (87.86), Shinella sp. strain HZN7 (15) (GenBank accession no. ASM165256v1) (87.61), Shinella granuli DSM 18401 (36) (GenBank accession no. ASM434188v1) (87.59)Vogesella mureinivorans 389 (12) (GenBank accession no. ASM764403v2) (90.37), Vogesella perlucida DS-28 (9) (GenBank accession no. ASM784415v2) (90.18), Vogesella urethralis YM-1 (37) (GenBank accession no. ASM764404v2) (88.28), Vogesella sp. strain LIG4 (38) IMG taxon (GenBank accession no. 2517093049) (82.86), Vogesella alkaliphila KCTC 32041 (39) (GenBank accession no. ASM1465247v1) (82.63)
Summary of isolate characteristics and most closely related strains by ANI Illumina libraries were prepared with a Nextera XT kit and sequenced on a MiSeq system using both 1 × 300-bp single-end reads and 2 × 300-bp paired-end reads. Fastp (v0.20.1) (--detect_adapter_for_pe) (20) was used for adapter trimming and quality control (QC). Reads passing QC were assembled with Trycycler (v0.5.0) (21) using Raven (v1.6.0) (22), Flye (v2.9-b1768) (23), and miniasm (v0.3-r179) (24). All assembled sequences were successfully circularized by Trycycler with the “reconcile” command. Plasmids are defined as circularized extrachromosomal sequences. Assemblies were polished with medaka (v1.4.4; ONT) and Pilon (v1.24) (25). Quality was assessed with CheckM (v1.1.3) (26); all genomes were >99% complete and had <1% contamination. Sequences of the 16S rRNA genes were extracted using Barrnap (v0.9) (27) and compared to the NCBI 16S rRNA database (28) using BLASTn (29) to determine the five most closely related genera. Genomes from these genera were downloaded from RefSeq and compared to the isolates using FastANI (v1.32) (30) (Table 1). Genomes were uploaded to GenBank and annotated by PGAP (31, 32). Currently, few other genomes from these genera (2 Kinneretia species, 17 Shinella species, and 9 Vogesella species) are available from RefSeq, and the ANI values for all three isolates are well below the 96% ANI threshold that is widely used to indicate species boundaries (33). Therefore, these genomes provide a valuable addition to our knowledge of these three genera.

Data availability.

All sequencing data have been deposited in DDBJ/ENA/GenBank and the SRA under BioProject PRJNA763310. Isolates have been deposited at Manaaki Whenua-Landcare Research (New Zealand). Accession numbers are shown in Table 1.
  36 in total

1.  Kinneretia asaccharophila gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater lake, a member of the Rubrivivax branch of the family Comamonadaceae.

Authors:  Margarita Gomila; Jarone Pinhassi; Enevold Falsen; Edward R B Moore; Jorge Lalucat
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs.

Authors:  Mikhail Kolmogorov; Jeffrey Yuan; Yu Lin; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Vogesella urethralis sp. nov., isolated from human urine, and emended descriptions of Vogesella perlucida and Vogesella mureinivorans.

Authors:  Kai Lan; Yi-Mei Cai; Liang-Hui Li; Jian-Ming Zeng; Xue-Gao Yu; Ping-Hua Qu; Hong-Lin Li; Yu-Yang Liu; Liang Chen; Cha Chen; Bin Huang
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Quantifying the Importance of the Rare Biosphere for Microbial Community Response to Organic Pollutants in a Freshwater Ecosystem.

Authors:  Yuanqi Wang; Janet K Hatt; Despina Tsementzi; Luis M Rodriguez-R; Carlos A Ruiz-Pérez; Michael R Weigand; Heidi Kizer; Gina Maresca; Raj Krishnan; Rachel Poretsky; Jim C Spain; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-03-31       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Vogesella perlucida sp. nov., a non-pigmented bacterium isolated from spring water.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Chou; Jui-Hsing Chou; Mei-Chun Lin; A B Arun; Chiu-Chung Young; Wen-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes.

Authors:  Donovan H Parks; Michael Imelfort; Connor T Skennerton; Philip Hugenholtz; Gene W Tyson
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement.

Authors:  Bruce J Walker; Thomas Abeel; Terrance Shea; Margaret Priest; Amr Abouelliel; Sharadha Sakthikumar; Christina A Cuomo; Qiandong Zeng; Jennifer Wortman; Sarah K Young; Ashlee M Earl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The Complete Genome Sequence of the Nicotine-Degrading Bacterium Shinella sp. HZN7.

Authors:  Jiguo Qiu; Youjian Yang; Junjie Zhang; Haixia Wang; Yun Ma; Jian He; Zhenmei Lu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Trycycler: consensus long-read assemblies for bacterial genomes.

Authors:  Ryan R Wick; Louise M Judd; Louise T Cerdeira; Jane Hawkey; Guillaume Méric; Ben Vezina; Kelly L Wyres; Kathryn E Holt
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 13.583

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.