Literature DB >> 34913716

Draft Genome Sequences of Four Streptomycin-Sensitive Erwinia amylovora Strains Isolated from Commercial Apple Orchards in Ohio.

A M Jimenez Madrid1, T Klass2, V Roman-Reyna2, J Jacobs2,3, M L Lewis Ivey1.   

Abstract

Erwinia amylovora is the causative agent of fire blight, a devastating disease of apples and pears worldwide. Here, we report draft genome sequences of four streptomycin-sensitive strains of E. amylovora that were isolated from diseased apple trees in Ohio.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34913716      PMCID: PMC8675263          DOI: 10.1128/MRA.00893-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc        ISSN: 2576-098X


ANNOUNCEMENT

Fire blight, which is caused by Erwinia amylovora, is among the most devastating bacterial diseases of apples worldwide and occurs annually in Ohio orchards. Antibiotics, especially streptomycin sulfate, are the most effective strategy to control this disease (1). However, widespread use of streptomycin has led to the emergence of streptomycin-resistant (SmR) E. amylovora strains in orchards across the United States (2). We sequenced the genomes of four streptomycin-sensitive (SmS) strains of E. amylovora that had been isolated from diseased commercial apple trees in Ohio. Bacterial isolations from symptomatic shoots were conducted using Crosse-Goodman medium and nutrient broth yeast (NBY) agar as described previously (3). Erwinia amylovora strains (Table 1) were screened for SmR using a bioassay test (4). Single colonies were restored from 30% glycerol stocks by streaking on NBY medium, and total genomic DNA was extracted using the Nextera DNA Flex microbial colony extraction protocol (5). Extracted DNA was quantified by spectrophotometry and adjusted to 20 ng/μl for library preparation. Sequencing libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA preparation kit, and the libraries were sequenced on the Illumina iSeq 100 platform with 150-bp paired-end sequencing. Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise specified. Illumina Local Run Manager software was used to convert and trim the resulting sequences. The quality of sequenced reads was assessed with FastQC v0.11.9 (6). SPAdes v3.14.1 was used to de novo assemble the E. amylovora genomes and determine genome coverage (7). Genomes were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) v5.2 (8–10).
TABLE 1

Genomic information for the sequenced draft genomes of four Erwinia amylovora strains isolated from commercial apple orchards in Ohio

SpeciesStrainCity and county of isolationHostNo. of readsGenome coverage (×)Genome size (Mb)No. of contigsG +C content (%)N50 (bp)NCBI accession no.
ANI (%) vs E. amylovora ATCC 49946LINbase no.LINbase best match (ANI [%])ANI (%) vs strain:
GenBankSRABioSampleMLI90-17MLI90-17MLI90-17MLI90-17
Erwinia amylovora MLI90-17Wooster, Wayne County, OhioApple584,484163.85353.5123,502 JAIMFV000000000 SRR16598628 SAMN20930864 99.9851A0B0C1D0E0F0G0H0I1J0K0L0M0N1O0P0Q8R0S0TE. amylovora NHSB01-1 (99.968)100.0099.9099.98999.90
Erwinia amylovora MLI181-18Lexington, Richland County, OhioApple369,454113.86353.5192,887 JAIMFW000000000 SRR16598627 SAMN20930865 99.9051A0B0C1D0E0F0G0H0I1J0K0L0M0N0O0P1Q1R0S0TE. amylovora MAGFLF 2 (99.957)99.90100.0099.894100.00
Erwinia amylovora MLI217-18Laurelville, Hocking County, OhioApple387,771153.816353.6172,997 JAIMFX000000000 SRR16598626 SAMN20930866 99.9851A0B0C1D0E0F0G0H0I1J0K0L0M0N1O0P2Q0R0S0TE. amylovora LA635 (99.943)99.9999.8910099.90
Erwinia amylovora MLI200-18Medina, Medina County, OhioApple270,374103.819053.6156,483 JAIMFY000000000 SRR16598625 SAMN20930867 99.8951A0B0C1D0E0F0G0H0I1J0K0L0M0N3O0P0Q0R0S0T99.90100.0099.90100
Genomic information for the sequenced draft genomes of four Erwinia amylovora strains isolated from commercial apple orchards in Ohio Classification of the assembled genomes was conducted by average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis using the enveomics collection (11) and LINbase with genome sequence as the identification method (12–16). SmR in E. amylovora occurs either from the presence of strA and strB on plasmids pEA29 or pEA34 or through a mutation in codon 43 of rpsL (17, 18). The presence of SmR genes was analyzed by mapping strain reads to E. amylovora plasmid pEA34 (GenBank accession number M96392.1) and rpsL (GenBank accession number NC_013961.1) with the programs BWAv0.17 and IGVv2.10.3 and by conducting BLAST searches for these genes against the assembled genomes (19–21). The four E. amylovora strains were nearly identical to the reference strain (E. amylovora ATCC 49946 [GenBank accession number FN666575.1]), with ANI values ranging from 99.89% to 99.98% (Table 1). LINbase results confirmed E. amylovora as the best match for each sequenced genome. All four Ohio strains contained the E. amylovora strain Ea88 ubiquitous plasmid pEA29 (GenBank accession number NC_005706.1) but not strA, strB, or pEA34, indicating an SmS genotype (17, 18). The genome sequences and genomic analysis workflow for the SmS strains provide a baseline to screen and monitor for SmR in Ohio apple orchards. Further genomic analysis of E. amylovora will increase our understanding of the genetic basis for resistance, allowing us to better address the sustainability of streptomycin use for fire blight management.

Data availability.

Data were deposited in NCBI GenBank (BioProject accession number PRJNA756955). The partial genomes were also deposited in LINbase. The BioSample accession number, GenBank accession number, and LINbase number for each E. amylovora strain are presented in Table 1.
  15 in total

Review 1.  A proposal for a portal to make earth's microbial diversity easily accessible and searchable.

Authors:  Boris A Vinatzer; Long Tian; Lenwood S Heath
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler.

Authors:  Andrey Prjibelski; Dmitry Antipov; Dmitry Meleshko; Alla Lapidus; Anton Korobeynikov
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-06

3.  A Proposal for a Genome Similarity-Based Taxonomy for Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria that Is Sufficiently Precise to Reflect Phylogeny, Host Range, and Outbreak Affiliation Applied to Pseudomonas syringae sensu lato as a Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Boris A Vinatzer; Alexandra J Weisberg; Caroline L Monteil; Haitham A Elmarakeby; Samuel K Sheppard; Lenwood S Heath
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  Antibiotic use in plant agriculture.

Authors:  Patricia S McManus; Virginia O Stockwell; George W Sundin; Alan L Jones
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-02-20       Impact factor: 13.078

5.  Effects of Consecutive Streptomycin and Kasugamycin Applications on Epiphytic Bacteria in the Apple Phyllosphere.

Authors:  K A Tancos; K D Cox
Journal:  Plant Dis       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Erwinia amylovora: modern methods for detection and differentiation.

Authors:  Antonet M Svircev; Won-Sik Kim; Susan M Lehman; Alan J Castle
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

7.  Similarity-based codes sequentially assigned to ebolavirus genomes are informative of species membership, associated outbreaks, and transmission chains.

Authors:  Alexandra J Weisberg; Haitham A Elmarakeby; Lenwood S Heath; Boris A Vinatzer
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.835

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  A system to automatically classify and name any individual genome-sequenced organism independently of current biological classification and nomenclature.

Authors:  Haitham Marakeby; Eman Badr; Hanaa Torkey; Yuhyun Song; Scotland Leman; Caroline L Monteil; Lenwood S Heath; Boris A Vinatzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation.

Authors:  Daniel H Haft; Michael DiCuccio; Azat Badretdin; Vyacheslav Brover; Vyacheslav Chetvernin; Kathleen O'Neill; Wenjun Li; Farideh Chitsaz; Myra K Derbyshire; Noreen R Gonzales; Marc Gwadz; Fu Lu; Gabriele H Marchler; James S Song; Narmada Thanki; Roxanne A Yamashita; Chanjuan Zheng; Françoise Thibaud-Nissen; Lewis Y Geer; Aron Marchler-Bauer; Kim D Pruitt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.