| Literature DB >> 34913407 |
Fan Tian1, Xiao-Feng Liao2, Lian-Hui Wang1, Xin-Xiang Bai3, Yan-Bin Yang1, Zai-Qi Luo1, Feng-Xia Yan1.
Abstract
Seed germination and seedling development in nearly all orchid species rely on a symbiotic relationship with mycorrhizal fungi; however, this is not the case with all mycorrhizal fungi. This study aims to provide an understanding about the important role of mycorrhiza in seed germination and growth of Paphiopedilum barbigerum. Therefore, we isolated and identified endophytic fungi from the roots of wild P. barbigerum. The beneficial mycorrhizal fungi Epulorhiza sp. FQXY019 and Tulasnella calospora FQXY017 were screened by seed symbiotic germination tests and found to promote seed germination. However, only the seeds inoculated with FQXY019 progressed from the seed germination to rooting stage. This shows that mycorrhizal fungi and P. barbigerum have a specific relation at different growth phases. In addition, we selected FQXY019 and inoculated it into MS medium, B5 medium, OMA medium, and PDA medium. The results showed that FQXY019 co-cultured on PDA significantly promoted the increase in seedling fresh weight, leaf length, and root length (p < .01). Furthermore, it significantly promoted the root number and leaf number of seedlings compared with those co-cultured on MS, B5, and OMA media and control (p < .05). Thus, this study demonstrated the promoting effect of Epulorhiza sp. FQXY019 on seed germination and seedling development, making it an alternative method for the artificial propagation of P. barbigerum.Entities:
Keywords: Paphiopedilum barbigerum; germination; growth; mycorrhizal fungi; seed; seedling
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34913407 PMCID: PMC8920121 DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2021.2005882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Signal Behav ISSN: 1559-2316
Figure 1.Longitudinal and transverse profiles of the roots of Paphiopedilum barbigerum grown from wild seedlings. Arrows represents peloton (a,b).
Occurrence and frequency of the endophytic fungi isolates
| Fugal Isolate | Number of Strains | Isolation Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| FQXY001 | 21 | 0.16 |
| FQXY002 | 17 | 0.13 |
| FQXY005 | 16 | 0.13 |
| FQXY006 | 7 | 0.06 |
| FQXY008 | 9 | 0.07 |
| FQXY016 | 2 | 0.02 |
| FQXY015 | 1 | 0.01 |
| FQXY019 | 36 | 0.28 |
| FQXY042 | 1 | 0.01 |
| FQXY045 | 1 | 0.01 |
| FQXY047 | 1 | 0.01 |
| FQXY017 | 15 | 0.12 |
Identification of ITS sequences of endophytic fungi isolates from Paphiopedilum barbigerum roots
| Fugal Isolate | Assigned identity based on most similar GenBank accession | Identity (%) | Query Coverage (%) | Class | GenBank Accession Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FQXY001 | 96.83 | 100 | Sordariomycetes | MN540302.1 | |
| FQXY002 | 99.43 | 97 | Sordariomycetes | KT269843.1 | |
| FQXY005 | 99.59 | 92 | Sordariomycetes | MT649908.1 | |
| FQXY006 | 100 | 100 | Sordariomycetes | KY283799.1 | |
| FQXY008 | 99.62 | 98 | Sordariomycetes | KT269843.1 | |
| FQXY016 | 100 | 100 | Sordariomycetes | MT563396.1 | |
| FQXY015 | Fungal endophyte | 97.21 | 100 | – | KY765176.1 |
| FQXY019 | 97.93 | 94 | Agaricomycetes | GU166409.1 | |
| FQXY042 | 99.62 | 100 | Leotiomycetes | KX000263.1 | |
| FQXY045 | 100 | 100 | Sordariomycetes | MN817697.1 | |
| FQXY047 | 99.81 | 100 | Sordariomycetes | JF439467.1 | |
| FQXY017 | 96.56 | 100 | Agaricomycetes | GU166406.1 |
Figure 2.Protocorm-like bodies were formed after 30 d with FQXY019 (a). The first leaf emerged after 50 d with FQXY019 (b). Rooting occurred after 80 d with FQXY019 (c).Turned light brownish green and seed coat ruptured after 40 d with FQXY017 (d). Protocorm-like bodies formed after 55 d with FQXY017 (e). The coleoptile emerged after 75 d with FQXY017 (f). Browning after 90 d with FQXY017 (g). Seeds expand but not break through the testa after 90 d with FQXY001 (h). Seeds expand but not break through the testa after 90 d with FQXY005 (i). Seeds germinated and broke through the seed coat but could not further develop after 90 d (CK) (j).
Germination of Paphiopedilum barbigerum seeds inoculated with endophytic fungi cultured on PDA plates
| Fugal Isolate | Germination and growth stage (germination and growth rate) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seed coat ruptured by enlarged embryo (%) | Formation protocorm-like bodies (%) | Emergence of first leaf (%) | Further development and rooting (%) | |
| FQXY019 | 76 | 69 | 67 | 65 |
| FQXY017 | 52 | 41 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY001 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY005 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY006 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY016 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY015 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY042 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY045 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| FQXY047 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CK | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Figure 5.The morphology of the colony and mycelium of the mycorrhizal fungi FQXY019 and FQXY017. FQXY019 colonies were at the early stage (a); FQXY019 colonies were at the later period (b); mycelium of FQXY019 (c); FQXY017 colonies were at the early stage (d); FQXY017 colonies were at the later period (e); mycelium of FQXY017 (f).
Figure 6.Phylogenetic tree based on ITS-rDNA sequence of mycorrhizal fungi isolated from Paphiopedilum barbigerum and the closest identified relatives from GenBank.