Literature DB >> 34913317

[Application of three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty in breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis].

Yu Feng1, Juan Li2, Donglin Zhang3, Jiao Zhou1, Xiangquan Qin1, Xiran Liu1, Mengxue Qiu1, Huanzuo Yang1, Zhenggui Du1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the application and effectiveness of three-pedicle reduction mammoplasty in breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis.
METHODS: The clinical data of 15 breast cancer female patients with hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis treated by three-pedicle reduction mammaplasty with inverted T incision between January 2019 and March 2021 were retrospectively analysed. The patients were aged 31-58 years, with a median age of 39 years. The disease duration ranged from 10 days to 9 months (median, 3.4 months). All patients had unifocal tumor, with a maximum diameter of primary tumor of 0.5-3.9 cm (mean, 2.0 cm), of which 12 were diagnosed with invasive carcinoma and 3 carcinoma in situ. Tumor stage: T isN 0M 0 in 3 cases, T 1N 0M 0 in 4 cases, T 1N 2M 0 in 2 cases, T 2N 0M 0 in 4 cases, and T 2N 1M 0 in 2 cases. The preoperative cup sizes of patients were D cup in 3 cases, DD cup in 1 case, E cup in 2 cases, EE cup in 2 cases, F cup in 2 cases, FF cup in 1 case, and ≥G cup in 4 cases. The distance from nipple to inframammary fold was 8-18 cm (mean, 12.2 cm) before operation. The patients were followed up regularly after operation to evaluate the breast reduction effect and complications; Breast cancer reporting outcome scale (BREAST-Q) was used to assess patients' satisfaction and quality of life; and ultrasound, chest and abdominal CT, whole-body bone scan were performed to assess local tumor recurrence or distant metastasis.
RESULTS: The postoperative nipple position was slightly higher than inframammary fold in all patients. Postoperative cup sizes were A cup in 3 cases, B cup in 6, C cup in 4, D cup in 1, and DD cup in 1, which showing significant difference when compared with preoperative cup sizes ( Z=3.420, P=0.001). The median follow-up time was 9 months (range, 6-33 months). Postoperatively, 2 cases (13.3%) had wound-site cellulitis, 1 (6.7%) had mild fat liquefaction, 2 (13.3%) had nipple and areola hypoesthesia but recovered after 3 months. No complication such as fat necrosis, papillary areola complex, or flap necrosis occurred. All patients had undergone adjuvant radiotherapy, of which 1 (6.7%) showed mild skin color change after radiotherapy, but no radiotherapy-related complication occurred in all patients. No patient was readmitted, received reoperation, or delayed to adjuvant therapy due to complications. In the BREAST-Q score, breast satisfaction and quality of life scores at 3 and 6 months after operation were significantly better than those before operation and at 1 month after operation ( P<0.05); no significant difference was found between at 1 month after operation and before operation ( P>0.05). Nipple satisfaction scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation were 15.6±2.2, 18.5±1.4, 19.3±0.7, respectively. At discharge after operation, the patient's satisfaction with the outcome of the operation was scored 84.7±11.4. The score of adverse events of radiotherapy at 6 months after operation was 6.5±0.8. During the follow-up, patient had no local recurrence, distant metastasis, or breast cancer related death.
CONCLUSION: For breast cancer patients with moderate or greater breast hypertrophy and/or moderate-to-severe breast ptosis, three-pedicle reduction mammoplasty can not only remove the lesions, but also reduce hypertrophic breasts, accomplish the mammoplasty, reduce the radiotherapy complications, and improve the satisfaction and quality of life of patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; breast hypertrophy; breast ptosis; reduction mammoplasty; three-pedicle technique

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34913317      PMCID: PMC8669191          DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202107068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi        ISSN: 1002-1892


  25 in total

1.  The Superomedial Pedicle Wise-Pattern Breast Reduction: Reproducible, Reliable, and Resilient.

Authors:  Rodger H Brown; Richard Siy; Khurrum Khan; Shayan Izaddoost
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 2.  Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Lucy De La Cruz; Stephanie A Blankenship; Abhishek Chatterjee; Rula Geha; Nadia Nocera; Brian J Czerniecki; Julia Tchou; Carla S Fisher
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  A prospective comparison of breast sensibility after reduction mammoplasty: Superior versus superomedial pedicle.

Authors:  Thomas Silhol; Marc Chaouat; Rafik Harizi; Jérôme Lambert; Warren Noel; Maurice Mimoun; David Boccara
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.740

4.  Breast Cancer, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  William J Gradishar; Benjamin O Anderson; Jame Abraham; Rebecca Aft; Doreen Agnese; Kimberly H Allison; Sarah L Blair; Harold J Burstein; Chau Dang; Anthony D Elias; Sharon H Giordano; Matthew P Goetz; Lori J Goldstein; Steven J Isakoff; Jairam Krishnamurthy; Janice Lyons; P Kelly Marcom; Jennifer Matro; Ingrid A Mayer; Meena S Moran; Joanne Mortimer; Ruth M O'Regan; Sameer A Patel; Lori J Pierce; Hope S Rugo; Amy Sitapati; Karen Lisa Smith; Mary Lou Smith; Hatem Soliman; Erica M Stringer-Reasor; Melinda L Telli; John H Ward; Jessica S Young; Jennifer L Burns; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Oncoplastic reduction mammoplasty for breast cancer in women with macromastia: Oncological long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Mustafa Emiroglu; Semra Salimoglu; Cem Karaali; Ismail Sert; Osman Gungor; Fatma Sert; Cengiz Aydın
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.767

6.  Reduction mammaplasty provides long-term improvement in health status and quality of life.

Authors:  L Blomqvist; A Eriksson; Y Brandberg
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  Reduction mammaplasty: an advantageous option for breast conserving surgery in large-breasted patients.

Authors:  Fernando Hernanz; Sara Regaño; Alfonso Vega; Manuel Gómez Fleitas
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.279

8.  Impact of radiation therapy on acute toxicity in breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  M Back; M Guerrieri; C Wratten; A Steigler
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Therapeutic mammaplasty for breast cancer: oncological and aesthetic outcomes.

Authors:  Alexandra Grubnik; Carol Benn; Gereth Edwards
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Factors influencing cosmetic results after conservation therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  M E Taylor; C A Perez; K J Halverson; R R Kuske; G W Philpott; D M Garcia; J E Mortimer; R J Myerson; D Radford; C Rush
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-02-15       Impact factor: 7.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.