Lindsey Sattler1, Stephen B Hanauer2, Lisa Malter3. 1. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 550 1st Avenue, NBV 10 E1, New York, NY, 10016, USA. 2. Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA. 3. Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, New York University Langone Medical Center, 550 1st Avenue, NBV 10 E1, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Lisa.Malter@nyulangone.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: As treatment options for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) expand each class of medication will have specific safety concerns and side-effect profiles that need to be considered for optimal treatment of patients. We will review the most recent safety data for the newly approved immunomodulator therapies for the treatment of IBD. RECENT FINDINGS: There are a growing number of publications outlining safety concerns for medications used to treat IBD. We reviewed safety profile of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies (TNF) with specific attention to combination therapy (anti-TNF plus immunomodulator). Recent publications have demonstrated increased risk of serious infection and malignancy (lymphoma and overall cancer rates) in patients receiving anti-TNF combination therapy when compared with patients receiving anti-TNF monotherapy or immunomodulator monotherapy. Recent publications on Janus Kinase Inhibitors indicate an increased risk of infection, specifically Herpes Zoster, and increased risk of major cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolic events resulting in a black box warning for the medication. In contrast, anti-interleukin 12/23 agents and gut selective anti-integrin antibody agents have demonstrated a favorable side-effect profile with low rates of infection and malignancy. The latest class of medications to be approved, sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, have cardiac and infectious precautions. The field of IBD treatment is rapidly evolving with several mechanistic classes of medications now available. While corticosteroids continue to be associated with the greatest, overall, safety risks, each of the newer mechanistic classes have unique safety concerns. In the future, as we gain more experience with these agents, we will need to continue to evaluate the safety profile of our therapies used alone or in combination to make informed treatment decisions with our patients.
PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: As treatment options for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) expand each class of medication will have specific safety concerns and side-effect profiles that need to be considered for optimal treatment of patients. We will review the most recent safety data for the newly approved immunomodulator therapies for the treatment of IBD. RECENT FINDINGS: There are a growing number of publications outlining safety concerns for medications used to treat IBD. We reviewed safety profile of anti-tumor necrosis factor antibodies (TNF) with specific attention to combination therapy (anti-TNF plus immunomodulator). Recent publications have demonstrated increased risk of serious infection and malignancy (lymphoma and overall cancer rates) in patients receiving anti-TNF combination therapy when compared with patients receiving anti-TNF monotherapy or immunomodulator monotherapy. Recent publications on Janus Kinase Inhibitors indicate an increased risk of infection, specifically Herpes Zoster, and increased risk of major cardiovascular events and venous thromboembolic events resulting in a black box warning for the medication. In contrast, anti-interleukin 12/23 agents and gut selective anti-integrin antibody agents have demonstrated a favorable side-effect profile with low rates of infection and malignancy. The latest class of medications to be approved, sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, have cardiac and infectious precautions. The field of IBD treatment is rapidly evolving with several mechanistic classes of medications now available. While corticosteroids continue to be associated with the greatest, overall, safety risks, each of the newer mechanistic classes have unique safety concerns. In the future, as we gain more experience with these agents, we will need to continue to evaluate the safety profile of our therapies used alone or in combination to make informed treatment decisions with our patients.
Authors: David T Rubin; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Corey A Siegel; Bryan G Sauer; Millie D Long Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: E J Mao; G S Hazlewood; G G Kaplan; L Peyrin-Biroulet; A N Ananthakrishnan Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2016-11-10 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Peter D R Higgins; Martha Skup; Parvez M Mulani; Jay Lin; Jingdong Chao Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: James D Lewis; Joel M Gelfand; Andrea B Troxel; Kimberly A Forde; Craig Newcomb; Hopiy Kim; David J Margolis; Brian L Strom Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2008-05-20 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Gary R Lichtenstein; Edward V Loftus; Kim L Isaacs; Miguel D Regueiro; Lauren B Gerson; Bruce E Sands Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Gary R Lichtenstein; Brian G Feagan; Russell D Cohen; Bruce A Salzberg; Robert H Diamond; Samiyeh Price; Wayne Langholff; Anil Londhe; William J Sandborn Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-08-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Akbar K Waljee; Wyndy L Wiitala; Shail Govani; Ryan Stidham; Sameer Saini; Jason Hou; Linda A Feagins; Nabeel Khan; Chester B Good; Sandeep Vijan; Peter D R Higgins Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240