| Literature DB >> 34912920 |
Mahshid Bokaie1, Fariba Behzadpour2, Tahmineh Farajkhoda1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The beginning of a marital relationship is very important as a part of a family relationship, and it satisfies many mental and physical necessities in a safe environment and has a great impact on people's health. The aims of this study were to investigate the effectiveness of sexual health counseling based on cognitive behavioral approach on satisfaction and excitability of newly married women.Entities:
Keywords: Cognitive-behavioral therapy; counseling; marital status; sexual satisfaction; woman
Year: 2021 PMID: 34912920 PMCID: PMC8641726 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_684_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Educ Health Promot ISSN: 2277-9531
Content of the sexual counseling based on CBT
| Meeting content | Homework |
|---|---|
| Introducing each other | Familiarity with the genital area |
| Distributing the questionnaires | |
| Talking about importance of the sexual relationship | |
| Explaining about genital anatomy and sexual cycle | |
| Answering the questions | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session | Paying attention to sexual needs |
| Talking about sexuality in men and women | Write about how to respond spouse’s sexual desire |
| Talking about physiology and sexual performance | |
| Answering the questions | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session | writing about sexual concerns and sexual expectations and sexual schemas |
| Talking about how we can solve our sexual problems | |
| Talking about sexual schemas and concerns | |
| Talking about sexual expectations | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session | Performing non sensate focus massage two days a week |
| Training the sexual skills | |
| Explaining about non-sensate focus massage | Doing relaxation exercises |
| Improving communication skills | Doing verbal and nonverbal exercises to improve communication skills |
| Talking about how manage negative emotion | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session | Doing Kegel exercises daily |
| Training kegel exercise and other factors affecting sexual performance (nutrition, focusing on the moments, enjoying) | Getting proper diet |
| Writing negative thoughts | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session | Writing irrational beliefs (your and your spouse’s) |
| Talking about cognitive errors and irrational beliefs in matrimony life and teaching how to deal with them and resolve conflicts | Writing the thoughts daily |
| Training how to use daily table of thoughts | |
| Checking the assignments of the previous session Talking about the effect of emotions on matrimony life and sexual issues | Identifying positive and negative emotions, especially in sexual matters |
| Talking about the role of skills in effective sexual relationship | |
| Summarizing and reviewing the content distributing the questionnaires |
CBT=Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Mean sexual satisfaction score in three measurement stages in the intervention and the control group
| Sexual satisfaction | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( | ||
| Before intervention | 51.88±12.27 | 47.12±9.6 | 0.134 |
| Immediately after the intervention | 57.2±12.88 | 45.8±8.07 | 0.024 |
| One month after the intervention | 62.76±11.35 | 43.48±7.39 | 0.001 |
t-test. SD=Standard deviation. *P<0.05
Mean sexual excitability score in three measurement stages in the intervention and the control group
| Sexual excitability | Mean±SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( | ||
| Before intervention | 82.80±17.24 | 87.04±12.99 | 0.130 |
| Immediately after the intervention | 91.72±13.07 | 87.48±11.64 | 0.001 |
| One month after the intervention | 99.28±11.2 | 81.96±12.83 | 0.001 |
t-test. SD=Standard deviation. *P<0.05
Results of the analysis of variance with the repeated measures of sexual satisfaction and sexual excitability intra-group and inter-group
| Change resource sexual satisfaction | Sum of squares | Degrees of freedom | Mean of squares | Statistics | Effect size | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intra-group (satisfaction) | ||||||
| Time | 361.333 | 1.298 | 278.325 | 7.590 | 0.004 | 0.137 |
| Time × group | 1254.773 | 1.298 | 966.517 | 26.356 | 0.001 | 0.354 |
| Error | 2285.227 | 62.316 | 36.672 | |||
| Inter-group | ||||||
| Group | 5127.527 | 1 | 5127.527 | 18.788 | 0.001 | 0.968 |
| Error | 13,099.973 | 48 | 272.916 | |||
| Intra-group (excitability) | ||||||
| Time | 637.213 | 1.624 | 392.352 | 6.404 | 0.005 | 0.118 |
| Time × group | 6669.293 | 1.624 | 4106.486 | 67.026 | 0.001 | 0.583 |
| Error | 4776.160 | 77.956 | 61.267 | |||
| Inter-group | ||||||
| Group | 3109.927 | 1 | 3109.927 | 7.185 | 0.002 | 0.130 |
| Error | 20,776.080 | 48 | 432.835 |
ANOVA and repeated measures. *P<0.05
Mean difference of sexual satisfaction and sexual excitability in two groups before intervention (base line), after intervention (8th week) and follow-up (12th week)
| Groups | Sexual Satisfaction | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Time 1 | Time 2 | Mean difference (2-1) | SE | ||
| The intervention group | Before intervention (base line) | After intervention (8th week) | −5.320 | 1.615 | 0.009 |
| Before intervention (base line) | Follow-up (12th week) | −10.880 | 2.297 | 0.001 | |
| After intervention (8th week) | Follow-up (12th week) | −5.560 | 1.203 | 0.001 | |
| The control group | Before intervention (base line) | After intervention (8th week) | 1.320 | 0.637 | 0.184 |
| Before intervention (base line) | Follow-up (12th week) | 3.328 | 1.114 | 0.021 | |
| After intervention (8th week) | Follow-up (12th week) | 1.960 | 0.631 | 0.014 | |
| The intervention group | Before intervention (base line) | After intervention (8th week) | −4.680 | 1.314 | 0.002 |
| Before intervention (base line) | Follow-up (12th week) | −0.700 | 2.821 | 1.000 | |
| After intervention (8th week) | Follow-up (12th week) | 3.980 | 1.283 | 0.002 | |
| The control group | Before intervention (base line) | After intervention (8th week) | 5.320 | 2.081 | 0.200 |
| Before intervention (base line) | Follow-up (12th week) | 10.880 | 0.637 | 0.800 | |
| After intervention (8th week) | Follow-up (12th week) | 5.560 | 0.631 | 0.550 | |
Bonferroni post hoc test. SE=Standard error. *P<0.05