Literature DB >> 3491199

Occupational allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiologic study.

S M Bland, M S Levine, P D Wilson, N L Fox, J C Rivera.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study has been carried out at The National Institutes of Health to examine the prevalence of laboratory animal allergy (LAA) in a population exposed to animals, and to compare the prevalence of general allergy in the exposed v a control group. A group of 289 workers with light-to-moderate exposure to animals, 260 with heavy exposure, and 242 control subjects were interviewed. A slightly greater prevalence of general allergy was found among those working with laboratory animals (39%), than in the control group (33.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. The prevalence of LAA in the total exposed group was 23.9%. A history of atopic problems and history of allergy to domestic animals correlated significantly with LAA, as did the number of species of animals handled and the average number of hours per week exposed to laboratory animals, with evidence of dose-response relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3491199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  8 in total

1.  Incidence of allergy and allergy symptoms among workers exposed to laboratory animals.

Authors:  L Elliott; D Heederik; S Marshall; D Peden; D Loomis
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Disparities in ammonia, temperature, humidity, and airborne particulate matter between the micro-and macroenvironments of mice in individually ventilated caging.

Authors:  Matthew D Rosenbaum; Susan VandeWoude; John Volckens; Thomase Johnson
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Allergy to laboratory animals: an epidemiological study.

Authors:  K Aoyama; A Ueda; F Manda; T Matsushita; T Ueda; C Yamauchi
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1992-01

Review 4.  A review of epidemiological methods applied in studies on laboratory animal allergy. With a discussion of the relation between prevalence and risk of an irreversible disease in a dynamic population of constant size.

Authors:  T Faus-Kessler; J Tritschler
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1992

5.  Work related symptoms, sensitisation, and estimated exposure in workers not previously exposed to laboratory rats.

Authors:  P Cullinan; D Lowson; M J Nieuwenhuijsen; S Gordon; R D Tee; K M Venables; J C McDonald; A J Newman Taylor
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Risk factors associated with airway allergic diseases from exposure to laboratory animal allergens among veterinarians.

Authors:  Anna Krakowiak; Marta Wiszniewska; Patrycja Krawczyk; Bogdan Szulc; Tomasz Wittczak; Jolanta Walusiak; Cezary Pałczynski
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.851

7.  Impact of environmental microbiota on human microbiota of workers in academic mouse research facilities: An observational study.

Authors:  Peggy S Lai; Joseph G Allen; Diane S Hutchinson; Nadim J Ajami; Joseph F Petrosino; Thomas Winters; Christopher Hug; Gary R Wartenberg; Jose Vallarino; David C Christiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Laboratory animals and respiratory allergies: the prevalence of allergies among laboratory animal workers and the need for prophylaxis.

Authors:  Erica Ferraz; Luisa Karla de Paula Arruda; Ericson Bagatin; Edson Z Martinez; Andrea A Cetlin; Christian S Simoneti; Amanda S Freitas; José A B Martinez; Marcos C Borges; Elcio O Vianna
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.365

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.