Literature DB >> 34911815

The EVALI outbreak and tobacco sales in the USA, 2014-2020.

Alex C Liber1, Zachary Cahn2, Megan C Diaz3, Emily Donovan3, Donna Vallone3, Barbara Schillo3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The E-cigarette, or Vaping Product-Use Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) Outbreak of 2019 hospitalised thousands and killed dozens of people in the USA and raised perceptions of the dangers posed to health by electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). These illnesses along with continued increases in youth vaping rates lead to the passage of many state and federal laws intended to curtail the sale of flavoured e-cigarettes. Little is known about the impact of these events on US e-cigarette and cigarette retail sales.
METHODS: Using Nielsen Scantrack sales data from January 2014 to January 2020 for 23 US states, we evaluate the effect of the EVALI outbreak. First-differenced state-panel regressions tracking unit sales of total-level and category-level e-cigarettes and cigarette sales controlling for price, Tobacco 21 policy coverage, product distribution, seasonality, EVALI-attributable deaths, and state-level e-cigarette policies affecting the availability of e-cigarettes (non-tobacco flavoured and total) were employed.
RESULTS: Dollar sales of e-cigarettes declined 29% from their pre-EVALI peak by January 2020. Total sales of e-cigarettes declined in response to EVALI deaths and the total e-cigarette sales ban put in place in Massachusetts adopted in its wake. Cigarette sales were largely unchanged by either the direct or indirect policy effects of the EVALI outbreak, except for in Massachusetts, where cigarette sales-particularly those smoked by young people-rose temporarily after a total ban on e-cigarette sales.
CONCLUSION: Sales of e-cigarettes declined in response to the EVALI outbreak and from the most restrictive regulatory policies that were adopted in response, while sales of cigarettes were affected less. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electronic nicotine delivery devices; public policy; surveillance and monitoring; taxation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34911815     DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tob Control        ISSN: 0964-4563            Impact factor:   7.552


  2 in total

1.  Responses to potential nicotine vaping product flavor restrictions among regular vapers using non-tobacco flavors: Findings from the 2020 ITC Smoking and Vaping Survey in Canada, England and the United States.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely; Danielle M Smith; Alex C Liber; K Michael Cummings; Katherine A East; David Hammond; Andrew Hyland; Richard J O'Connor; Karin A Kasza; Anne C K Quah; Ruth Loewen; Nadia Martin; Gang Meng; Janine Ouimet; Mary E Thompson; Christian Boudreau; Ann McNeill; David T Sweanor; Geoffrey T Fong
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.591

2.  The impact of two state-level approaches to restricting the sale of flavored tobacco products.

Authors:  Tyra Satchell; Megan C Diaz; Daniel Stephens; Adrian Bertrand; Barbara A Schillo; Laurie P Whitsel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.135

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.