| Literature DB >> 34910592 |
Chenfeng Wang1,2, Yan Huang2, Xin Ma2, Baojun Wang2, Xu Zhang2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Never in mitosis gene A-related kinase 2 (NEK2) has been implicated in tumorigenesis in various tissues, but its function in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumorigenesis is unclear. We evaluated the correlation between NEK2 expression and ccRCC.Entities:
Keywords: NEK2; clear cell renal cell carcinoma; prognosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34910592 PMCID: PMC8689635 DOI: 10.1177/20587384211065893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ISSN: 0394-6320 Impact factor: 3.219
Figure 1.UALCAN analysis. (a) mRNA levels of NEK2 in ccRCC tissues and adjacent normal renal tissues. Data are mean ± SE. ****p < 0.0001. (b) NEK2 expression in normal tissues and ccRCC tissues differing in tumor stage. Data are mean ± SE. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001. (c) Kaplan–Meier survival curves of patients with ccRCC. The overall survival rate is classified as low or high. ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Figure 2.Tissue microarray immunohistochemical staining of NEK2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and adjacent normal tissues.
Figure 3.(a) (b) Immunohistochemical analysis of the NEK2 protein level in renal cell carcinoma and adjacent normal renal tissue. The average IHC staining score and the frequency distribution of protein levels are shown; p < 0.001. (c) The NEK2 staining score increased with more advanced T stage; **p < 0.01. (d) Kaplan–Meier survival curves based on our database. IHC: immunohistochemical.
Association between clear cell renal cell carcinoma and NEK2 expression and clinicopathological features.
| Characteristics | NO ( | NEK2IHC score M (Q1, Q3)* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.418 | ||
| <60 | 67 | 2 (1, 3) | |
| ≥60 | 30 | 3 (1, 4) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.898 | ||
| <25 | 35 | 2 (2, 4) | |
| ≥25 | 62 | 2.5 (1, 3.25) | |
| Gender | 0.985 | ||
| Male | 77 | 3 (1, 3) | |
| Female | 20 | 2 (2, 4) | |
| Overall TNM staging | 0.005 | ||
| Stage I + II | 55 | 2 (1, 3) | |
| Stage III + IV | 42 | 3 (3, 4) | |
| Fuhrman grade | 0.032 | ||
| ≤2 | 65 | 2 (1, 3) | |
| >2 | 32 | 3 (2, 4) | |
| Diameter (cm) | 0.145 | ||
| ≤7 | 76 | 2 (1, 3) | |
| >7 | 21 | 3 (2, 4) |
* M: Median, Q1: Quartile 1, Q3: Quartile 3; BMI: body mass index.
Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis of overall survival in our clinical database.
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| NEK2 level (high vs low) | 3.0215 (1.317, 6.929) | 0.009 | 2.985 (1.234, 7.218) | 0.015 |
| BMI | 0.849 (0.743, 0.969) | 0.016 | ||
| Age at initial pathologic diagnosis (60 vs. < 60) | 1.406 (0.615, 3.214) | 0.419 | ||
| Gender (male vs female) | 1.276 (0.506, 3.213) | 0.605 | ||
| Size (longest dimension) (4.6 cm vs. < 4.6 cm) | 5.345 (2.364, 12.086) | <0.001 | ||
| Pathologic T | 6.901 (1.840, 25.886) | 0.004 | 8.383 (2.195, 32.015) | 0.002 |
| Pathologic (T2 vs.T1) | 4.617 (1.320, 16.151) | 0.017 | 2.219 (1.466, 8.501) | 0.226 |
| Pathologic (T4 vs.T1) | 13.478 (4.567, 39.775) | <0.001 | 12.629 (4.136, 38.564) | <0.001 |
| Fuhrman scores (3 + 4 vs 1 + 2) | 4.435 (1.938, 10.153) | <0.001 | 3.5301 (1.466, 8.501) | 0.007 |
BMI: body mass index.