| Literature DB >> 34910584 |
Bruno Boivin1,2, Kasper C D Roet1,2, Xuan Huang1,2, Kyle W Karhohs3, Mohammad H Rohban3, Jack Sandoe4, Ole Wiskow4, Rie Maeda1, Alyssa Grantham1, Mary K Dornon1, Jenny Shao1, Devlin Frost1, Dylan Baker4, Kevin Eggan4, Anne E Carpenter3, Clifford J Woolf1,2.
Abstract
Patient stem cell-derived models enable imaging of complex disease phenotypes and the development of scalable drug discovery platforms. Current preclinical methods for assessing cellular activity do not, however, capture the full intricacies of disease-induced disturbances and instead typically focus on a single parameter, which impairs both the understanding of disease and the discovery of effective therapeutics. Here, we describe a cloud-based image processing and analysis platform that captures the intricate activity profile revealed by GCaMP fluorescence recordings of intracellular calcium changes and enables the discovery of molecules that correct 153 parameters that define the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis motor neuron disease phenotype. In a high-throughput screen, we identified compounds that revert the multiparametric disease profile to that found in healthy cells, a novel and robust measure of therapeutic potential quite distinct from unidimensional screening. This platform can guide the development of therapeutics that counteract the multifaceted pathological features of diseased cellular activity.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34910584 PMCID: PMC9265164 DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E21-10-0481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Biol Cell ISSN: 1059-1524 Impact factor: 3.612
FIGURE 1:Cellular activity extraction pipeline. (A) Schematic overview of the differentiation, plating, maturation, and imaging (whole field, 5×) of GCaMP6-positive human ALS patient–derived motor neurons. (B) Analysis of the fluorescence imaging data at a single time point does not allow for the identification of inactive cells (“original” & “pre”). Temporal projection of the calcium imaging data over 45 s, combined with spatial filtering, enables the identification of all cells regardless of activity (“post” & “cells”). (C) Fluorescence traces of cells identified in B. (D) Spontaneous neuronal activity in DMSO-treated cells is eliminated by TTX treatment.
FIGURE 2:Parameterization of cellular activity. (A) Traditional peak counting does not identify temporal (e.g., uneven interspike intervals) or amplitude differences in calcium transients. (B) A combination of differential and continuous wavelet transforms accurately identifies peaks in activity. (C) Automated peak deconvolution quantifies the rise, apex, fall, amplitude, and full width at half maximum of an individual peak. (D) Cellular peak parameters are quantified relative to three baselines: well background intensity, cell minimum intensity, and intensity at the peak onset (left). Signal-wide features of activity, including dispersion metrics (minimum, maximum, mean) and the area under the curve (AUC), are automatically captured (right). (E) Breakdown of the 153 activity parameters computed for each cell. A single node under the differential and wavelet methods is expanded for clarity; the other nodes share the same parameter subtree. (F) Spontaneous GCaMP activity analysis of SOD1A4V human motor neurons compared with isogenic corrected motor neurons (39b-cor) reveals variable differences across five example parameters. Features are normalized to the average of the 39b group and presented as mean ± SEM using Welch’s t test.
FIGURE 3:Multiparametric drug screening strategy. (A) Schematic illustrating that both genetic mutation correction and drug action can restore a healthy activity phenotype in a diseased cell line. (B) Ranking of the top 25 individual parameter differences between the disease (39b) and corrected cell line (39b-cor) reveals the relative importance of features. (C) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of 1902 compounds from the Selleck bioactive library 6 and 24 h after treatment; each compound is represented using the 153 activity features normalized to the control phenotype. Compound name, mechanism of action, and molecular targets of the four hits that resulted in cellular activity closest to the healthy phenotype at each time point are shown. (D) Comparison of the multiparametric activity signatures for the disease phenotype (39b), the healthy phenotype (39b-corrected), a hit compound (apremilast), and a non–hit compound (obatoclax mesylate) on 39b motor neurons (MN) distinguishes activity patterns. Features are ordered based on preassigned positions in the grid and normalized to fit on the same intensity scale. (E) Comparison of the negative control (DMSO) and three hits (apremilast, halcinonide, PU-H71) that replicated in a validation screen on 39b MN reveals similar activity profiles and distinct molecular structures across the hits. (F) Depiction of phenotypic signatures capturing complex activity phenotypes in control and disease neuronal populations (first two rows). The action of an effective drug on diseased cells restores the control (healthy) phenotype (third row). No phenotypic signatures are produced for inactive cells (fourth row). The comparison of signatures provides a basis for measuring drug efficacy.