Yuzhen Yan1,2, Edward J Brook3, Andrei V Kurbatov4, Jeffrey P Severinghaus5, John A Higgins1. 1. Department of Geosciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. 2. Department of Earth, Environmental and Planetary Sciences, Rice University, Houston, TX, USA. 3. College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. 4. Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME, USA. 5. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Oxygen (O2) is an important life-supporting chemical species that plays a profound role in biological and geochemical processes on Earth. Past variations of O2 partial pressure (PO2) are commonly derived from geochemical models constrained by carbon and/or sulfur isotopes (–) and from proxies that are sensitive to the presence of oxygen, such as multiple sulfur isotopes (), isotopes of redox-sensitive metals (), iodine speciation (), and the abundance of charcoal (). The magnitude of the modeled or proxy-based PO2 variations, however, often disagrees in both magnitude and sign (), calling for more accurate reconstructions of the atmospheric O2 concentration. Attempts to directly measure past PO2 were limited to a few geologic archives that can preserve the atmosphere, such as amber () and fluid inclusions in minerals (), although the robustness of these archives has been questioned ().Ice cores offer a unique opportunity to study past variations of PO2 because the ice directly traps the ancient atmosphere. This distinctive capability motivated early measurements of molecular oxygen in the trapped air (, ). However, the gas-trapping process in ice leads to a small exclusion of O2 that has traditionally hindered the use of trapped O2 in ice cores to derive true atmospheric PO2, as the magnitude of this exclusion is comparable to that of the long-term PO2 change (see Supplementary Text for a more in-depth review). For example, Landais et al. () first observed in the trapped air of Dome C (EDC) ice cores a decline of the O2/N2 ratios (expressed as δO2/N2 hereafter; δ = Rsample/Rstandard – 1, where R is the elemental or isotopic ratio of interest and the standard is modern air) over the past 800 thousand years (ka), but the authors did not provide a conclusive explanation on the origin of this decline (i.e., a natural long-term δO2/N2 trend versus a storage artifact).Additional data from three more deep polar ice cores (GISP2, Vostok, and Dome F) also exhibit a persistent decreasing trend in δO2/N2, the magnitude of which is −8.4 ± 0.2‰/million year (Ma) (1σ) (). This trend has recently been corroborated by additional measurements on better preserved cores from EDC (), indicating that the Late-Pleistocene δO2/N2 decline is not an artifact but a robust atmospheric signal (). Because the atmospheric reservoir of N2 is expected to remain stable on time scales of hundreds of millions of years (), the decline in ice core δO2/N2 is interpreted to reflect a decreasing PO2. Proposed drivers of this decline, as presented by Stolper et al. (), include net oxidation of reduced carbon and sulfur associated with enhanced Pleistocene physical and chemical weathering () and/or the effects of decreased ocean temperature on organic carbon burial rates (). The exposure of continental shelves during glacial sea-level lowstands has recently been identified as another potential candidate ().Here, we extend the ice-core record of atmospheric PO2 to ~1.5 Ma using “snapshots” of δO2/N2 in the air trapped in the glacial ice from the Allan Hills Blue Ice Area (BIA). The data include samples first reported by Yan et al. () and additional analyses conducted for the present study. We use the term snapshots to highlight the discontinuous nature of the blue ice samples and contrast that with the δO2/N2 time series obtained from continuous ice records (, ). In Allan Hills BIA, ancient (up to 2.7 Ma) ice is transported toward the surface by a combination of glacial flow guided by the underlying bedrock topography and strong katabatic winds (fig. S1) (, ). An absolute chronology of the ice is developed using the deficit of 40Ar compared to the modern atmosphere (termed 40Aratm and calculated as δ40Ar/38Ar – δ38Ar/36Ar) (, ). δ18O of the trapped O2 provides additional stratigraphic links between two ice cores (fig. S2). Each individual δO2/N2 sample was assigned the age of the closest 40Aratm datum. Using this chronology, we divided samples into three distinct time bins: 1.5 Ma (± 0.1 Ma), 810 ka (± 100 ka), and 400 ka (± 70 ka). The numbers represent the average of 40Aratm ages weighted by their respective analytical uncertainty, bracketed by ±95% confidence intervals (CIs). The samples within each age bin do not necessarily have the exact same age. Rather, they are binned together because their age difference cannot be resolved by the existing 40Aratm dating method. This means that the true width of age distribution (data S1) is likely wider than the 95% CI shown in the brackets. This is to our advantage because integrating over longer time intervals filters out high-frequency variations in PO2 while preserving the long-term trend. Binning age groups this way allows the age uncertainty to be more rigorously defined and the effect of dating uncertainties on the long-term PO2 change to be quantified.Reconstructing atmospheric PO2 from measurements of δO2/N2 of trapped air in ice cores requires corrections for fractionation during firnification and post-coring gas losses (, , ). In the study of Stolper et al. (), corrections were achieved by first removing the insolation cycles in the δO2/N2 time series by linear regression and then by applying a constant gas-loss correction to δO2/N2 so each ice core δO2/N2 time series arrives at 0 when time is extrapolated to present. However, in the case of blue ice records from Allan Hills BIA, the insolation signals and gas losses cannot be directly accounted for because the age is not well resolved. In addition, the possibility of imperfect preservation of the δO2/N2 variability in a discontinuous record like blue ice implies that simple descriptive statistics (mean and variance) of the snapshots could be biased toward periods with high accumulation rates/better sample preservation (). To reduce these confounding factors, we take advantage of the argon-to-nitrogen ratios (expressed as δAr/N2, again with modern air as the standard) in the trapped gases and use δAr/N2 as a proxy for fractionation modulated by insolation during firnification and fractionation due to post-coring gas loss.Ar and N2 are fractionated during bubble close-off and gas loss in a fashion similar to O2 and N2 but different in magnitude, leading to the covariation between δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 in ice cores (, , ). Part of this covariation arises from bubble close-off fractionation and is ultimately modulated by local insolation (). As a result, correcting δO2/N2 using δAr/N2 measurements effectively removes the effect of local insolation on δO2/N2 during firnification. In the Supplementary Text, we show that post-coring gas loss can also be empirically accounted for by δAr/N2 corrections, although two other aspects of the δAr/N2 correction merit consideration here. First, due to the very small outgassing rate of 40Ar (0.066‰/Ma) () and the long residence time of N2 (), atmospheric δAr/N2 variations will be far smaller than the changes in δO2/N2 inferred from ice cores and can thus be neglected. The effect of global ocean temperature on the solubility of Ar and N2 and atmospheric δAr/N2 values is also expected to be small (<0.2‰) and can also be neglected. Second, this method is expected to be robust to the partial preservation and recovery of the true range of δO2/N2 or δAr/N2 variability, as long as the slope of the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data remains the same (Fig. 1). In this case, the offset in two populations of δO2/N2-δAr/N2 is interpreted to reflect changes in PO2.
Fig. 1.
A schematic illustration of paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach (not to scale).
Suppose there are two populations of δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data with different ages (stars), different magnitude of gas fractionation (dashed arrows), and different degree of sample preservation (dashed circles). The true atmospheric δO2/N2 changes can be inferred from the offset in the observed δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data if (i) the slopes of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2 within the two populations are the same and (ii) there is no secular change in δAr/N2. The first assumption is supported by the empirical observation that the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 slopes exhibited in Allan Hills samples are statistically indistinguishable among three intervals. The second assumption is supported by a lack of long-term ice core δAr/N2 trend over the past 800 ka ().
A schematic illustration of paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach (not to scale).
Suppose there are two populations of δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data with different ages (stars), different magnitude of gas fractionation (dashed arrows), and different degree of sample preservation (dashed circles). The true atmospheric δO2/N2 changes can be inferred from the offset in the observed δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data if (i) the slopes of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2 within the two populations are the same and (ii) there is no secular change in δAr/N2. The first assumption is supported by the empirical observation that the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 slopes exhibited in Allan Hills samples are statistically indistinguishable among three intervals. The second assumption is supported by a lack of long-term ice core δAr/N2 trend over the past 800 ka ().
RESULTS
Testing the paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach using EDC and Vostok ice
To test the validity of this paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach, we first used a recently published, gravitationally corrected dataset of δAr/N2 from EDC (N = 40) between 120 and 700 ka to correct the δO2/N2 data measured from the same ice (). This dataset was obtained from ice stored at −50°C and is considered free from post-coring gas-loss fractionation. Six age bins were identified. In each age bin, δAr/N2 was normalized to −6.3‰, the average value of all δAr/N2 data in the record, to calculate δO2/N2 using the observed δO2/N2-δAr/N2 relationship in that bin (fig. S3). Except in the youngest (135 ka) group, the corrected δO2/N2 falls almost exactly on the trend line of δO2/N2 versus time [−7.0 ± 0.6 (1σ) ‰/Ma; Fig. 2] calculated from a high-resolution Dome C δO2/N2 record (N = 325) compiled by Extier et al. (). Note that this high-resolution Dome C δO2/N2 record does not include the low-resolution δO2/N2 time series. The trend line observed in the low-resolution δO2/N2 record after δAr/N2 corrections is −9.1 ± 2.5‰/Ma (1σ). In spite of the relatively low temporal resolution of the data measured by Haeberli et al. (), the δAr/N2 correction manages to reproduce the trend in δO2/N2, highlighting that this approach does not require the full or unbiased preservation of the true δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 variability in the ice.
Fig. 2.
Testing the paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 using the Dome C ice core gas records.
A composite Dome C δO2/N2 (gray dots) compiled by Extier et al. () yields a temporal trend of −7.0 ± 0.6‰/Ma (1σ; shown as a solid line bracket by two dashed curves). The corrected δO2/N2 data (red squares with error bars representing the 95% CI) binned into six age groups (fig. S3) also yield a decreasing trend with a slope of −9.1 ± 2.7‰/Ma (1σ). Raw δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 data for correction are from Haeberli et al. ().
Testing the paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 using the Dome C ice core gas records.
A composite Dome C δO2/N2 (gray dots) compiled by Extier et al. () yields a temporal trend of −7.0 ± 0.6‰/Ma (1σ; shown as a solid line bracket by two dashed curves). The corrected δO2/N2 data (red squares with error bars representing the 95% CI) binned into six age groups (fig. S3) also yield a decreasing trend with a slope of −9.1 ± 2.7‰/Ma (1σ). Raw δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 data for correction are from Haeberli et al. ().Next, we applied the paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach to the Vostok δO2/N2 record between 243.5 and 372.5 ka (, ), which exhibits a temporal trend of −20.2 ± 3.3‰/Ma (1σ; fig. S4). We note that the trend in Vostok is steeper and with larger uncertainties than the rate inferred from the Dome C δO2/N2 record, possibly because of Vostok record’s relatively short time span (~130 ka) and hence a relatively large insolation signal here. We arbitrarily divided the Vostok gas data into two age groups: 243.5 to 300 ka (N = 27) and 300 to 372.5 ka (N = 29). When δAr/N2 is normalized to −4.8‰, the average value of all Vostok δAr/N2 data between 243.5 and 372.5 ka, the estimated δO2/N2 (± 2σ) is −8.9 ± 0.6‰ in the >300-ka group and −10.6 ± 0.5‰ in the <300-ka group. Using a time span of 64.5 ka (the difference between 271.75 and 336.25 ka), the inferred δO2/N2 rate of change is −26.0 ± 6.2‰/Ma (1σ). The δAr/N2 correction leads to about two times larger uncertainty for the final estimated δO2/N2 change rate, possibly due to the scatters in the δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 cross-plot. Another reason may be the short time span and the small magnitude of the change (hence the larger relative error).To sum up, in both cases of EDC and Vostok ice, corrections by δAr/N2 are able to recover a rate of δO2/N2 change that is statistically indistinguishable from the rate of δO2/N2 changes regressed directly against time. This agreement justifies the application of paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach in 1.5-Ma samples from the Allan Hills BIA.
δO2/N2-δAr/N2 in Allan Hills ice samples
δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 measured on Allan Hills ice samples and corrected for gravitational fractionation using the δ15N of N2 () are also linearly correlated (Fig. 3). In addition, we find that the slope of the regression line in the three age units is statistically indistinguishable (Table 1). This lack of difference suggests that there has been no fundamental change to the physical mechanisms that fractionate O2, Ar, and N2 over time in the Allan Hills ice, and provides an empirical justification for the use of δAr/N2 to correct Allan Hills δO2/N2 data for fractionation associated with bubble close-off and gas losses, and incomplete sampling of δO2/N2 variability associated with local insolation. Given the small difference in the slope of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2 across the three age units, we first normalize δO2/N2 values by correcting measured δAr/N2 value to −7.1‰, the average value of all δAr/N2 data (N = 88) reported in this study. Physically, this normalization means that the effect of insolation on δO2/N2 has been removed, and all the δO2/N2 data have the same extent of gas loss. This is different from normalizing δAr/N2 to 0, which would effectively eliminate all gas losses. Next, we applied a secondary gas loss correction by adding 17.4‰ to the estimated δO2/N2 to obtain atmospheric δO2/N2, conceptually similar to that by Stolper et al. (). δO2/N2 should reach 0 when time is extrapolated to the present day (Fig. 4). This secondary correction does not change the slope inferred from the estimated δO2/N2 after δAr/N2 normalization. Extrapolating δAr/N2 to 0 (the theoretical true atmospheric value) for δO2/N2 correction does not change our results but is associated with larger uncertainties (see y intercepts in Table 1).
Fig. 3.
Cross-plot of δO2/N2 versus δAr/N2 measured in Allan Hills ice core samples, binned according to their age (error represents the 95% CI of the regression slopes).
Solid lines in (A) to (C) represent the regression lines of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2, with the CI bracketed by the dashed lines. The regression lines of the three intervals are shown in (D) to demonstrate their offset.
Table 1.
Results of ordinary least squares linear regression of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2 measured in Allan Hills ice core samples.
Errors are given as 95% CIs.
Post-MPT
MPT
Pre-MPT
(400 ± 70 ka)
(810 ± 100 ka)
(1.5 ± 0.1 Ma)
Slope
1.74 ± 0.44
1.60 ± 0.50
1.51 ± 0.38
Y intercept
−0.9 ± 3.1‰
2.2 ± 3.8‰
2.0 ± 2.9‰
Correlationcoefficient r
0.84
0.76
0.86
Corrected δO2/N2 (when δAr/N2 = −7.1‰)
−13.3 ± 1.2‰
−9.2 ± 0.8‰
−8.7 ± 0.8‰
Fig. 4.
Pleistocene δO2/N2, Pco2, and ice volume.
(A) An ice core–based time series of atmospheric δO2/N2 composite (gray circles) () and discontinuous atmospheric δO2/N2 snapshots reconstructed from blue ice δO2/N2 (red circles, this work). Black line represents the extrapolated regression line of the continuous 800-ka δO2/N2 composite, with the 95% CIs bracketed by the two dashed lines. Vertical error bars associated with blue ice δO2/N2 are the 95% CIs of the corrected δO2/N2 when δAr/N2 is normalized to −7.1‰. Horizontal error bars represent the 95% CI of the age estimates. The blue ice δO2/N2 values were systematically increased by 17.4‰, so δO2/N2 reaches 0 when extrapolated from the 810- and 400-ka data to present, consistent with the treatment of the composite atmospheric δO2/N2 time series (). (B) A continuous ice core CO2 record over 800 ka (solid purple line) (–), atmospheric CO2 reconstructions based on boron isotopes (dashed purple line) (), and the Allan Hills blue ice CO2 data, grouped to the same age assignment as for δO2/N2 (purple circles) (, ). (C) Stacked oxygen isotope composition of benthic foraminifera (LR04) ().
Cross-plot of δO2/N2 versus δAr/N2 measured in Allan Hills ice core samples, binned according to their age (error represents the 95% CI of the regression slopes).
Solid lines in (A) to (C) represent the regression lines of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2, with the CI bracketed by the dashed lines. The regression lines of the three intervals are shown in (D) to demonstrate their offset.
Results of ordinary least squares linear regression of δO2/N2 against δAr/N2 measured in Allan Hills ice core samples.
Errors are given as 95% CIs.
Pleistocene δO2/N2, Pco2, and ice volume.
(A) An ice core–based time series of atmospheric δO2/N2 composite (gray circles) () and discontinuous atmospheric δO2/N2 snapshots reconstructed from blue ice δO2/N2 (red circles, this work). Black line represents the extrapolated regression line of the continuous 800-ka δO2/N2 composite, with the 95% CIs bracketed by the two dashed lines. Vertical error bars associated with blue ice δO2/N2 are the 95% CIs of the corrected δO2/N2 when δAr/N2 is normalized to −7.1‰. Horizontal error bars represent the 95% CI of the age estimates. The blue ice δO2/N2 values were systematically increased by 17.4‰, so δO2/N2 reaches 0 when extrapolated from the 810- and 400-ka data to present, consistent with the treatment of the composite atmospheric δO2/N2 time series (). (B) A continuous ice core CO2 record over 800 ka (solid purple line) (–), atmospheric CO2 reconstructions based on boron isotopes (dashed purple line) (), and the Allan Hills blue ice CO2 data, grouped to the same age assignment as for δO2/N2 (purple circles) (, ). (C) Stacked oxygen isotope composition of benthic foraminifera (LR04) ().When normalized to the mean δAr/N2 value (−7.1‰), the corrected δO2/N2 is −8.7 ± 0.8‰ (95% CI; N = 25) in the 1.5 ± 0.1 Ma ice, −9.2 ± 0.8‰ (95% CI; N = 34) in the 810 ± 100 ka ice, and −13.3 ± 1.2‰ (95% CI; N = 29) in the 400 ± 70 ka ice (Table 1). The inferred rate of Late-Pleistocene δO2/N2 change, calculated by dividing the δO2/N2 difference in the 810 ± 100 ka and 400 ± 70 ka ice by their age difference, is −10.2 ± 2.5‰/Ma (1σ). The uncertainty is estimated by a Monte-Carlo simulation in which the division operations are repeated 10,000 times assuming a normal distribution for δO2/N2 and age according to their calculated 95% CIs. The uncertainty in our estimates is relatively large because our approach has fewer samples than the continuous δO2/N2 records obtained from deep ice cores and the 40Aratm ages of the blue ice introduce another layer of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the change in PO2 estimated from Allan Hills ice is statistically indistinguishable from the estimated change of −8.4 ± 0.2‰/Ma (1σ) diagnosed by Stolper et al. (), supporting our paired δO2/N2-δAr/N2 approach.In contrast, the calculated rate of PO2 change between the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 dataset recorded in the 1.5-Ma and 810-ka ice is −0.7 ± 0.9‰/Ma (1σ), statistically indistinguishable from zero. Because of the large size of the atmospheric O2 reservoir (3.8 × 1019 mol) and the relatively small O2 flux associated with geologic sources and sinks, the geologic residence time of atmospheric O2 is over 1 Ma (), meaning that large PO2 fluctuations between 1.5 Ma and 810 ka unlikely result from geologic O2 sources or sinks. Some readers may identify photosynthesis and aerobic respiration in the biological cycling of oxygen as sources and sinks of O2, but the biosphere reservoir of organic carbon is two orders of magnitude smaller than the atmospheric O2 reservoir (fig. S5). For example, glacial-interglacial changes of terrestrial biosphere carbon reservoir size amount to ~3 to 7 × 1016 mol O2 (), which would lead to a shift of the PO2 of ~1 to 2‰. To illustrate this point further, permafrost is a major source of unstable organic carbon reservoir and represents ~1 × 1018 g carbon in Earth’s near surface (0 to 3 m) (). Oxidizing this entire surface reservoir would only lead to a 2‰ decline in atmospheric O2. We thus conclude that the initiation of the decline in atmospheric PO2 approximately coincided with the Mid-Pleistocene transition (MPT), a period between ~1250 and 700 ka where Earth’s climate underwent a fundamental shift characterized by the emergence of high-amplitude glacial-interglacial oscillations and an increase in the duration of glacial cycles from 40 to 100 ka (–).
DISCUSSION
Assuming a geologic residence time of ~2 Ma (), the decline in δO2/N2 over the last 800 ka is equivalent to a ~2% excess of O2 sinks over sources (). These O2 sources and sinks include (i) the burial of reduced carbon, sulfur, and iron species into the sedimentary reservoir (geologic O2 source) and (ii) the oxidative weathering of the previously buried reduced carbon, sulfur, and iron species exhumed to Earth’s surface (geologic O2 sink). Because the total amount of O2 consumed over the last 800 ka (~2.4 × 1017 mol) is equivalent to ~1.2 times the combined size of the terrestrial and marine biosphere and soils (in O2 equivalents; fig. S5), changes in geologic sources and/or sinks must act to drive the long-term PO2 change.Our new data, which almost doubles the length of the existing ice-core record of atmospheric O2 (), indicates (i) an even slower rate of change of PO2 on a multimillion-year time scale and (ii) that the decline over the last 800 ka appears to have begun sometime around the MPT (Fig. 4). Before this, sources and sinks of O2 appear to have been in close balance. That the MPT marks the beginning of this small Late-Pleistocene imbalance in O2 sources and sinks is important for two reasons. First, the timing suggests a causal link between the MPT and a change in the global O2 balance favoring sinks over sources. This link, regardless of its ultimate cause(s), provides unique information about the processes that regulate atmospheric O2 on geologic time scales. Second, assuming that the global CO2 and O2 cycles are linked, Pco2 (partial pressure of CO2) should begin to increase as soon as PO2 starts to decline. However, there is no apparent increase in atmospheric CO2 across the MPT (Fig. 4), which requires mechanisms to stabilize atmospheric Pco2.Across the MPT, the increase of global ice volume added up to ~60 m in sea-level equivalents, estimated from changes in benthic foraminiferal δ18O values (, , ). This volumetric increase appears to have been accommodated largely by an increase in ice sheet thickness, as geologic evidence indicates that the areal extent of Laurentide Ice Sheet has been similar since Early Pleistocene (). In the meantime, mountain glaciers appear to have expanded considerably across the MPT in the Alps, Canadian Rockies, Tibetan Plateau, and Patagonia [() and references therein]. Deep-sea temperature changes across the MPT reconstructed from Mg/Ca ratios recorded in foraminiferal shells are ambiguous and inconclusive due to different regional trends (, ). An alternate approach, which subtracts an independently reconstructed global ice-volume from the benthic δ18O stack, shows that there appears to be no substantial deep-sea cooling across the MPT (). Interglacial CO2 levels remained somewhat stable before and after the MPT varying between 260 and 300 parts per million (ppm), but a decrease of glacial CO2 concentration minima by ~30 ppm (Fig. 4) was reconstructed from blue ice () and from boron isotopes in marine fossils ().Existing hypotheses on the Late-Pleistocene decline of O2 include (i) a decrease in the burial of reduced carbon and sulfur species linked to long-term ocean cooling and an increase in the solubility of O2 in the seawater [a hypothesis first put forward by Shackleton () to explain the Cenozoic history of O2], (ii) an increase in the oxidation of reduced carbon and sulfur species associated with lower sea-level during glacial maxima and the exposure of recently deposited marine sediments (), and/or (iii) an increase in the oxidation of reduced carbon and sulfur species relative to enhanced organic carbon and pyrite burial due to higher erosion rates ().Ocean cooling over the Pleistocene [hypothesis (i)] is possible, although it is not firmly established from global deep-sea temperature records (, ) or marginal marine environments where most of the reduced carbon and sulfur is buried. In contrast, increased oxidation of reduced carbon and sulfur associated with increased exposure of the continental shelf during the sea-level lowstands of the Late Pleistocene [hypothesis (ii)] can explain ~70% of the Late-Pleistocene PO2 decline (). However, this estimate is likely an upper limit, because the calculation is based on pyrite exposed by a ~90-m sea-level difference in the Late-Pleistocene glacial cycles. If we apply the same mechanism given the glacial-interglacial sea-level difference of ~60 m before the MPT, either PO2 declined at a slower rate of −4‰ to −5‰/Ma in the Early Pleistocene (not consistent with observation) or only the deeper pyrite newly exposed by the additional 30-m sea-level drop after the MPT acted to break the balance between oxygen sources and sinks. In the latter case, the expected effect of continental shelf pyrite exposure and oxidation will only be able to account for ~21% of the observed Late-Pleistocene atmospheric O2 decline.Increased oxidation of reduced carbon and sulfur associated with increased Late-Pleistocene continental glaciation and erosion [hypothesis (iii)] is therefore more likely to have contributed to the post-MPT δO2/N2 decline. For example, a link between more extensive post-MPT mountain glaciation and an increase in erosion rates is observed at St. Elias Mountains, Alaska (). In addition, glacial weathering elevates pyrite oxidation that acts as a net O2 sink () and increases the oxidation rates of fossil organic carbon in rocks by a factor of 2 to 3 in glaciated mountainous regions due to enhanced frost cracking, abrasion, oxygen availability in deeper soil horizons, and microbial activity (). All these glaciation-facilitated processes could enhance O2 sinks, thereby leading to a PO2 drawdown since the MPT with the presence of larger ice sheets. We note that increasing erosion rates also promote organic and pyrite burial, and the net effect on PO2 remains not fully resolved (). In any case, both hypotheses (ii) and (iii) suggest that the MPT could not only reshape the glacial-interglacial cycles but also profoundly affect the biogeochemical cycles of carbon and oxygen.Last, a decline in PO2 due to changes in organic carbon burial and oxidation would inject CO2 to the coupled atmosphere-ocean system. Even if that decline is entirely due to the enhanced pyrite oxidation, atmospheric CO2 would still increase—albeit with a smaller magnitude due to interactions with the inorganic carbon cycle. When coupled with calcium carbonate dissolution, pyrite oxidation has a stoichiometric 8:15 ratio of CO2 produced to O2 consumed (). This is approximately half the yield of CO2 during oxidation of organic carbon, assuming the composition of the organic carbon is CH2O (i.e., 1 mol of CO2 is produced when 1 mol of O2 is consumed). Only when all the H+ produced during pyrite oxidation is consumed by silicate dissolution can Pco2 be truly decoupled from the oxygen cycle ().Records of atmospheric CO2 from both ice cores () and boron isotopes in foraminifera () indicate that average CO2 levels either did not substantially change or actually declined across the MPT (Fig. 4). As noted by Stolper et al. (), this observation can be explained by the Pco2-dependent silicate weathering feedback with a 200- to 500-ka response time. However, we note that with even the fastest response times Pco2 must still increase in order for the feedback to establish a balance between sources and sinks [figure 3 in the study of Stolper et al. ()]. This instantaneous increase in Pco2 was ignored by Stolper et al. () because it only occurs following the initiation of a decline in PO2 and the timing of that initiation was not resolved in the 800-ka PO2 record. Our ability to identify the MPT as the initiation of a decline in PO2 means that this initial increase in CO2 can no longer be ignored. Additional responses and/or enhanced feedbacks within the global carbon cycle are required to explain why CO2 remained constant or declined across the MPT. Although speculative, two promising candidates are (i) enhanced CO2 storage in the deep Atlantic Ocean () enabled by seafloor calcium carbonate dissolution () and linked to ocean circulation changes () and (ii) enhanced chemical weathering resulting from the transition from regolith to fresh, unweathered crystalline bedrock beneath the Laurentide Ice Sheet that became first exposed around the MPT ().Oxygen-to-nitrogen ratios in the air bubbles trapped in blue ice from Allan Hills, East Antarctica provide a record of atmospheric O2 extending to the Early Pleistocene after correction by argon-to-nitrogen ratios preserved in the same sample. This correction approach is tested on the Vostok and Dome C δO2/N2 records and successfully reproduces their long-term trends. A decline in PO2 inferred from 810- and 400-ka Allan Hills ice samples agrees with PO2 reconstructions based on continuous ice records (, ), further supporting the δAr/N2 correction method. There is no statistically significant δO2/N2 difference between samples at 1.5 Ma and 810 ka, suggesting a stable mean O2 level and a balanced O2 sources and sinks before the MPT. The coincidence of PO2 decline with the MPT hints at the role of glaciation that enhances erosion rates as well as promotes the oxidative weathering of sedimentary organic carbon and reduced sulfur species. The lack of transient Pco2 increase in response to the declining PO2 requires responses in the carbon cycle to stabilize atmospheric CO2, possibly first via a fast increase of deep ocean carbon storage as a result of ocean circulation changes (, ) and in the long term by an enhanced silicate weathering due to the exposure of pre-Cambrian crystalline bedrock underneath the Laurentide Ice Sheet starting around the MPT ().
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Glaciological settings
Allan Hills (76.73°S, 159.36°E) is located ~100 km to the northwest of the McMurdo Dry Valleys in Victoria Land, East Antarctica. Sampling sites are located to the west of the Allan Hills nunatak in the Main Ice Field (MIF; fig. S1). Samples reported in this study come from two boreholes in the MIF with close proximity: ALHIC1502 (76.73286°S, 159.35507°E) and ALHIC1503 (76.73243°S, 159.35620°E). Local glaciological conditions in the MIF are documented elsewhere (–), and Dadic et al. () provide a detailed survey of meteorological conditions and surface snow properties. In brief, the Allan Hills area is characterized by constant katabatic wind, sweeping away shallow snow patches and ablating the ice at the surface (). The presence of blue ice near Allan Hills is further facilitated by a nunatak obstructing the upcoming glacial flow and a steep slope on the lee side of a mountain buried under the ice (, ). The steep bedrock slope and low basal temperature inhibit glacial flow, thereby promoting the preservation of exceptionally old ice. Although modern-day glaciological survey reveals a local accumulation regime (), the source region of the ice buried at depth in the Allan Hills BIAs remains unclear.While the glaciological conditions favor the preservation of old ice here, they also pose several challenges to using blue ice as paleoclimate archives. First, the unique glaciological dynamics at the BIAs make it difficult to constrain the chronology of the ice, as ice movement has likely disturbed the otherwise continuous ice stratigraphy. If the age of the blue ice samples is within 800 ka, they could be synchronized to the deep ice cores via various age markers (). However, if the age exceeds 800 ka, which is the case of Allan Hills blue ice, there is no existing record to synchronize to. An absolute dating method that does not require prior glaciological information is needed. In the section below, we describe the time scale development using gravitationally corrected 40Ar/38Ar ratio (40Aratm).
Time scale development
We established the blue ice chronology by measuring the gravitationally corrected 40Ar/38Ar ratios (40Aratm, calculated as δ40Ar/38Ar – δ38Ar/36Ar) in the trapped gases (). Individual 40Aratm datum and the corresponding uncertainty is included in data S1. This method takes advantage of the fact that atmospheric 40Ar burden slowly increases over time because of the radioactive decay of 40K in the solid Earth, while 38Ar and 36Ar are primordial and their abundance is stable over geologic history. The rate of 40Aratm change is +0.066‰/Ma over the past 800 ka (), and we caution that the outgassing rate could have changed before the MPT and therefore changed our extrapolation results. If weathering rates have increased since the MPT due to more extensive glaciation, the outgassing rate of 40Ar is expected to be lower in the Early Pleistocene than in the Late Pleistocene. In this scenario, the >800-ka samples discovered at the Allan Hills BIA would have an even older age. This age underestimation means that the 1.5-Ma data point in Fig. 4 would need to be moved to the right, but the conclusions of this study would remain the same because δO2/N2 is essentially constant between the 810-ka and 1.5-Ma age bins.In addition, because the depths of δO2/N2 samples are different from those of 40Aratm samples, in most cases, the age of δO2/N2 samples was assigned to their closest 40Aratm datum reported by Higgins et al. () and Yan et al. (). Note that the analytical uncertainties associated with the 40Aratm measurements (at least 10% of the sample age) preclude an age assignment precise enough to establish a time series. To maximize the utility of the 40Aratm data, we classify samples into different age groups and calculate the average age () on the basis of individual 40Aratm measurements (x), weighted by their corresponding uncertainty (σ)The error associated with the weighted mean is given byUnderlying this error estimation is the implicit assumption that all samples within the age bin have the exact same age and the precision of age estimates is purely limited by the analytical precision of 40Aratm. We acknowledge that there is no independent evidence to support this assumption. That being said, the purpose of such age binning is to provide a quantifiable age uncertainty that can then be taken into consideration in calculating long-term PO2 trend. Basing these calculations on the difference between the average age of two or more intervals has proven valid in EDC (fig. S3) and Vostok (fig. S4). In any case, uncertainties associated with age will affect the estimated rate of PO2 decline in the Late-Pleistocene, but will not change the conclusion of a stable atmospheric O2 level before the MPT.Three age groups were identified and listed in Table 1: pre-MPT, MPT, and post-MPT, in accordance with the definition by Yan et al. (). The post-MPT group has an average 40Aratm of 400 ± 70 ka (95% CI) from 23 40Aratm measurements made on 20 depths in ALHIC1502 and ALHIC1503 cores. Similarly, the mean age of the MPT group is calculated to be 810 ± 100 ka (95% CI), constrained by nine 40Aratm data points from six depths. The pre-MPT age group has three sub-age units: 1.5, 2.0, and 2.7 Ma. In this study, we only include samples in the 1.5-Ma subgroup, the reason of which is discussed in the “Data quality and rejection criteria” section. This age (1.5 ± 0.1 Ma; 2σ) is estimated by four unreplicated 40Aratm.In the upper 170 m of ALHIC1502, there are only four 40Aratm data that provide age constraints. The transition from post-MPT to MPT age unit in ALHIC1502 is located between 143.19 and 172 m, the last post-MPT and the first MPT 40Aratm-based age estimates, respectively. This data gap requires alternative estimates to identify the transition from post-MPT to MPT ice samples. By comparison, the chronology of ALHIC1503 is better constrained by 33 40Aratm analyses from 27 depths. We assume that ALHIC1502 and ALHIC1503 have an overall similar age-depth structure given their close proximity, and the variations in δ18Oatm can be used as a marker to identify the depth at which MPT ice first appears in ALHIC1502. In ALHIC1503, the transition from post-MPT to MPT age unit occurs along with a rapid δ18Oatm decline from 1.361 to 0.488‰ (). In ALHIC1502, this transition occurs between 146.40 and 147.99 m (fig. S2 and data S2). We therefore choose the midpoint in between (147.20 m) as the arbitrary divide between post-MPT and MPT ice. Note that there are no δO2/N2 data points between 146.40 and 147.99 m in ALHIC1502, so the conclusion of this paper is not affected by where this divide is exactly chosen.Another interesting feature of the depth profile of 40Aratm in ALHIC1502 is the rather young (~880 ka) age in the deepest measured sample with a depth of 190 m. In contrast, the deepest 40Aratm measurement in ALHIC1503 yields an age of 2.7 ± 0.3 (1σ) Ma. There are two possible explanations: (i) The ice dates back to the MPT and is buried under the pre-MPT ice due to stratigraphic disturbance or (ii) the age is underestimated because of input of radiogenic 40Ar from the bedrock. We have no way of identifying the true cause(s), but either way, it would not affect the conclusion of this paper because the δO2/N2 data were rejected on other bases (see the “Data quality and rejection criteria” section).
Analytical methods for δO2/N2 and δAr/N2
The analytical procedures of δO2/N2, δAr/N2, and δ15N of N2 data reported in this study are modified from Dreyfus et al. () and described in detail by Yan et al. (). A brief summary is outlined below. A total of ~20-g ice was cut from the core, with the outer 2 to 3 mm removed and subsequently melted under vacuum. To achieve that vacuum, the ambient air inside the glass container that carried the ice was pumped away for 3 min by a turbomolecular pump with the container placed in a dry ice–isopropanol bath. The ~200-ml glass container has a Louwers-Hapert valve at the top and an Ace-Thred connection sealed by a Viton O-Ring. After ice melted, the glass vial was loaded onto an electromechanical rotator to let the air and meltwater equilibrate (). After 4 hours, the glass vial was taken down from the rotator, connected to a Büchner flask upside down, and drained by a rotatory pump. Then, the vial was flipped upside down and placed in a −30°C bath to let residual water refreeze. Gases in the headspace were cryogenically collected at 4 K in a stainless steel dip tube submerged in liquid helium. During the gas collection, H2O and CO2 were removed by two sequential gas traps, one kept at −100°C and the second placed in liquid nitrogen bath.The dip tube was allowed to warm up at room temperature for at least an hour. Later, it was attached to an isotope-ratio mass spectrometer (Thermo Delta Plus XP) for elemental and isotopic analysis for ~30 min. The configuration of the mass spectrometer permits simultaneous measurement of mass 28 (14N14N) to mass 44 (12C16O2), thereby yielding raw 15N/14N, O2/N2, Ar/N2, and 18O/16O ratios at the same time. Analysis of each single sample was made up of 24 individual cycles, each with a 16-s integration time. The raw δ15N, δ18O, δO2/N2, and δAr/N2 ratios were corrected for pressure imbalance based on the ion currents on the sample and reference sides (). Pressure-corrected δ15N and δ18O were further corrected for the elemental composition of the O2-N2 mixture (termed “chemical slope correction”) (). After pressure imbalance and chemical slope corrections, pressure and chemically corrected δ15N was used to correct for gravitational fractionation in δO2/N2, δAr/N2, and δ18O of O2 (termed δ18Oatm). Those gravitationally corrected data, presented in data S2, are used for interpreting atmospheric O2 concentrations.The final pooled SDs of all Allas Hills δO2/N2, δAr/N2, and δ18Oatm [excluding those reported by Higgins et al. () because of their procedural differences] are ±3.372, ±2.081, and 0.027‰, respectively. All δ values have been standardized to the modern atmosphere. We note that the analytical uncertainties of Allan Hills δO2/N2 reported here, by Yan et al. (), and by Higgins et al. () are worse than the reproducibility of the same properties achieved in other deep ice cores, which is well noted by Stolper et al. () and led to the exclusion of 1 Ma Allan Hills blue ice δO2/N2 data in that study. For example, the reproducibility of δO2/N2 measured on EDC and Dome Fuji ice samples is 0.37‰ () and 0.2‰ (), respectively. This difference in reproducibility likely arises from the fact that gases are trapped in bubbles in the Allan Hills ice, whereas the EDC and Dome F δO2/N2 data were measured on ice that exclusively contains clathrate. Similar conclusions are drawn from Vostok samples, where gases contained in bubbles exhibit more scatter in measured δO2/N2 than gases from bubble-free, all-clathrate ice (). It may be the case that bubbles are more susceptible to gas loss and fractionation as compared to clathrates. At any rate, the difference of bubbles versus clathrates means that Allan Hills data cannot be directly compared against other deep ice core data. Internal comparison between Allan Hills samples (all with bubbles only) of different ages is still justified. We acknowledge that the estimated δO2/N2-δAr/N2 slope and intercept derived from ice with bubbles must have larger uncertainty than does the slope and intercept derived from ice with clathrates only, but we expect the estimate to be unbiased, which is important for estimating long-term PO2 changes.Here, we quantitatively investigate how much the observed δO2/N2 reproducibility is limited by the analytical precision associated with mass spectrometer analyses, using the 25 samples (all with replication) dating back to 1.5 Ma as an example. With a pooled SD of ±3.372‰ (1σ), 25 unique samples each with replication should yield a 95% CI of ±0.95‰, if all the disagreements between the δO2/N2 replicate values arise from the mass spectrometer measurements. The calculation is as follows: The observed pooled SD (3.372‰) is first divided by the square root of 2 to take replicate analyses into account, then divided by the square root of 25, the number of unique samples, and finally multiplied by 2 to yield the 95% CI. However, the 95% CI of the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 regression line is ±0.79‰ at δAr/N2 = −7.1‰, less uncertain than what pure analytical uncertainties alone would dictate. This observation means that correction by δAr/N2 reduces the uncertainties in the δO2/N2 dataset. Thus, the large analytical uncertainty of δO2/N2 measured on ice with bubbles must partly be sourced from processes that fractionate both δO2/N2 and δAr/N2, such as the different extent of gas losses experienced by the replicates during handling. The CI of the regression line and the estimated δO2/N2 can certainly benefit from improved analytical precision in the future.To investigate how large analytical uncertainties could potentially affect the estimate of δO2/N2, we used a “York Fit” algorithm that takes into account the inherent uncertainty in both the independent (δAr/N2) and dependent (δO2/N2) variables in a generalized linear model (MATLAB code available at www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/26586-linear-regression-with-errors-in-x-and-y) (). We chose the pooled SD to represent the uncertainty associated with δAr/N2 and δO2/N2 data. The results are shown in fig. S6. In all three intervals (post-MPT, MPT, and pre-MPT), the York Fit yields a steeper slope, but none is significantly different from the slope yielded by the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression method used in our analysis. For the post-MPT samples, the York Fit slope is 2.16 ± 0.84 (2σ; same as below) with a y intercept of 1.9 ± 5.9‰, compared to the slope of 1.74 ± 0.44 and the y intercept of −0.9 ± 3.1‰ yielded by the OLS regression. For the MPT samples, the York Fit slope and y intercept are 2.31 ± 1.40 and 7.4 ± 10.6‰, respectively, while the OLS regression slope and y intercept are 1.60 ± 0.50 and 2.2 ± 3.8‰, respectively. The MPT samples have the largest departure of York Fit from the OLS fit. Last, for the pre-MPT samples, a slope of 1.77 ± 1.00 and a y intercept of 3.9 ± 7.5‰ are obtained from the York Fit, whereas the OLS slope and y intercept are 1.51 ± 0.38 and 2.0 ± 2.9‰, respectively.Despite the changes to the slope when analytical uncertainties are taken into account, the estimated δO2/N2 when δAr/N2 is normalized to −7.1‰ does not change much (table S1), visually represented by the two types of regression lines intersecting near δAr/N2 = −7.1‰ (fig. S6). The corrected δO2/N2 (± 2σ) from York Fit is −13.47 ± 1.68, −8.96 ± 1.04, and −8.69 ± 1.06 for post-MPT, MPT, and pre-MPT samples, respectively. These results are very close to the OLS estimates made in the main text (table S1), because the value of −7.1‰ (the mean of all δAr/N2 values) is very close to the mean values of δAr/N2 in each age group. Visually, the York Fit tilts the slope of OLS regression around the arithmetic mean of the independent variables (δAr/N2). The estimated δO2/N2 near the arithmetic mean of δAr/N2 is therefore not substantially changed, but extrapolating δO2/N2 to δAr/N2 = 0 would lead to large differences (table S1). For these reasons, we still chose to regress δO2/N2 to δAr/N2 = −7.1‰ using the OLS method while acknowledging its inadequacy in addressing uncertainties in the variables. This facilitates the comparison of our regression results with the slopes of earlier work, all of which were done using the OLS method without factoring in the uncertainties in δO2/N2 or δAr/N2.
Data quality and rejection criteria
There are three batches of δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 dataset measured on ice collected from the Allan Hills BIA. The first batch was measured in 2013–2014 on samples drilled in 2010–2011 Antarctic field season. This batch of data (“batch 1”) was first reported by Higgins et al. () with the method described by Dreyfus et al. (). The second batch was measured in 2017 on samples collected in 2015–2016 Antarctic field season, with an updated gas extraction method described in this study. This batch of data (“batch 2”) has been reported by Yan et al. (). The third and final batch (“batch 3”) was measured in 2018 and 2019, again with the updated method and on samples drilled in 2015–2016. This study presents the batch 3 data for the first time.The key procedural distinction of batch 2 and 3 samples from batch 1 samples is that the pumping time has been greatly reduced. In batch 1 protocols, ice samples were pumped for an indefinite and variable amount of time until a vacuum level of 0.7 mtorr was reached. Each sample may therefore have experienced a varying degree of gas losses associated with storage and handling. The reduced pumping time applied to batch 2 and 3 data was intended to minimize gas losses due to pumping under vacuum and, if the losses are inevitable, to at least make the fractionation due to gas losses during pumping as consistent as possible. Note that this reduced pumping time does not prevent gas losses during storage and through fractures (if present).In addition to analytical procedures, the conditions under which batch 1 to 3 samples are stored are also different. Specifically, batch 1 data were obtained from ice samples stored at a −25°C freezer for more than 2 years, and certain samples have visible internal fractures. In contrast, the δO2/N2 and δAr/N2 data reported in the present study come exclusively from ice cores drilled in the 2015–2016 field season. They have been stored at −36°C in the National Ice Core Facility in Denver, CO until retrieval for cutting and processing shortly before laboratory analyses and have no surface cracks or fractures. These storage and procedural differences may help explain the larger scatter observed in the δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data reported by Higgins et al. () made on samples dating back to the MPT (fig. S7). Batch 1 data were therefore excluded from our analysis (though we still present them in data S2, marked as batch 1). Batch 2 and 3 data are considered equivalent in terms of the data quality.One post-MPT sample was rejected from batches 2 and 3 because of its very negative δAr/N2 value (−15.8‰). The δO2/N2 associated with this sample is −26.3‰, substantially (>5‰) more negative than typical ice core values. These anomalous negative ratios may arise from considerable gas loss experienced by this particular sample that greatly depletes Ar and O2 relative to N2. Six additional post-MPT samples were rejected because they are bracketed by pre-MPT age bins and might represent a different time slice than the shallow post-MPT samples. We still list these samples in data S2 but mark them as “anomalous gas loss” and “stratigraphy,” respectively. Including these data points in the regression analysis does not change the conclusion of this paper.In addition to gas losses, aerobic respiration and abiotic oxidation could affect the molecular oxygen concentrations in the trapped air. Even if O2 consumption does not occur in situ inside the ice being measured, the large O2 gradient could potentially drive a diffusive flux and modify the ice core δO2/N2. Many 2.0-Ma and all 2.7-Ma samples come from the sections are affected by respiration, evidenced by the depleted δ13C values and anomalously elevated CO2 levels (). Thirteen δO2/N2 samples in batches 2 and 3, including one that had already been excluded, were rejected on this basis (labeled “respiration” in data S2). There are only four 2.0-Ma samples that are considered “pristine” (i.e., not affected by respiration). These four pristine δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data points fall within the envelop defined by the rest of the Allan Hills blue ice δO2/N2-δAr/N2 data, but they were excluded from inferring Early-Pleistocene PO2 levels because of the small number of samples (annotated “2 Ma samples” in data S2). O2 consumption by nonmicrobial redox reactions such as Fe(II) oxidation has been observed in the nearby (~500 km) Talos Dome ice core (). In the case of Allan Hills samples, this process is expected to generate negligible impact on δO2/N2, because of the low dust loading in the vicinity of Allan Hills [<700 parts per billion (ppb) during glacial and <15 ppb during interglacial periods] () and the low concentration of iron in the aeolian dust (~3% by mass).In the case of very old ice here, an additional concern is the molecular diffusion through the ice that is capable of smoothing the signals in the gas record even after gases have become fully locked-in (). This concern was partly motivated by the reduced variability observed in the portion of ALHIC1502 gas records below 150 m (fig. S2) and has been addressed in greater length by Yan et al. (). We note that the variability reduction of δ18Oatm bears some resemblance to the reduced variability of δ18Oatm (among other properties) in the basal EDC ice below 3200 m (). In the basal EDC record, the homogenization of dissolved impurities profile was hypothesized to arise from “accelerated migration re-crystallization, which results in spatial chemical sorting of the impurities” () under ice temperature close to the pressure melting point. The lack of δ18Oatm variability between 3200 and 3260 m in EDC was not entirely understood, however, because if mechanical modification (stretching and annual layer thickening) was the reason, the 60-m layer would need to span an unlikely ~10 ka in time (). An alternative possibility to stretching is diffusive smoothing, which has been shown to be capable of removing the submillennial-scale δDice variability () and would explain the lack of variability while preserving the mean values. It could be the case that the basal EDC δDice and δ18Oatm have been subject to extensive diffusive smoothing and therefore lost its variability on multimeter length scale. If so, the extent of water isotope diffusion should be greater than that of gas diffusion (). In the case of Allan Hills, calculations do not support the presence of molecular diffusion on the basis that δD of the ice shows considerable variability ().To summarize, all data measured on batch 1 samples and 23 data points from batches 2 and 3 were excluded. We retain a total number of 88 samples (each with at least one replicate) for calculations performed in this study.
Authors: Paul G Falkowski; Miriam E Katz; Allen J Milligan; Katja Fennel; Benjamin S Cramer; Marie Pierre Aubry; Robert A Berner; Michael J Novacek; Warren M Zapol Journal: Science Date: 2005-09-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: John A Higgins; Andrei V Kurbatov; Nicole E Spaulding; Ed Brook; Douglas S Introne; Laura M Chimiak; Yuzhen Yan; Paul A Mayewski; Michael L Bender Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Thomas B Chalk; Mathis P Hain; Gavin L Foster; Eelco J Rohling; Philip F Sexton; Marcus P S Badger; Soraya G Cherry; Adam P Hasenfratz; Gerald H Haug; Samuel L Jaccard; Alfredo Martínez-García; Heiko Pälike; Richard D Pancost; Paul A Wilson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Giovanni Baccolo; Barbara Delmonte; P B Niles; Giannantonio Cibin; Elena Di Stefano; Dariush Hampai; Lindsay Keller; Valter Maggi; Augusto Marcelli; Joseph Michalski; Christopher Snead; Massimo Frezzotti Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 14.919