Literature DB >> 34909712

Skin Microbiota and Clinical Associations in Netherton Syndrome.

Veera Sillanpää1, Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira Soratto2,3, Elina Eränkö1, Mauricio Barrientos-Somarribas2, Katariina Hannula-Jouppi1,4, Björn Andersson2, Annamari Ranki1.   

Abstract

Netherton syndrome (NS) is a rare, life-threatening syndrome caused by serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene (SPINK 5) mutations, resulting in skin barrier defect, bacterial skin infections, and allergic sensitization in early childhood. Recent data on adult patients with NS suggest that the presence of Staphylococcus aureus further promotes barrier disruption and skin inflammation. We analyzed the skin microbiota by shotgun sequencing in 12 patients with NS from eight Finnish families with healthy family controls as the reference and correlated the findings with allergen-specific IgE prevalence, immune cell phenotype, and infection history of the patients. Compared with healthy family controls, skin microbiome diversity and normal skin site variability were measurably decreased in patients with NS. No correlation was found between allergic sensitization and skin microbiota as such, but low circulating CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells significantly correlated with lower microbial diversity and less abundance of S. aureus (P < 0.05). S. aureus was the most prevalent species in patients with NS but also Streptococcus agalactiae was abundant in four patients. The genomic DNA relative abundance of S. aureus secreted virulence peptides and proteases PSMα, staphopain A, and staphopain B were increased in most of the samples of patients with NS, and their abundance was significantly (P < 0.05) associated with recurrent childhood skin infections, confirming the clinical relevance of S. aureus dominance in the NS skin microbiome.
© 2021 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome; ScpA, staphopain A; SspB, staphopain B

Year:  2021        PMID: 34909712      PMCID: PMC8659401          DOI: 10.1016/j.xjidi.2021.100008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JID Innov        ISSN: 2667-0267


Introduction

Netherton syndrome (NS) (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man #256500) is a severe ichthyosis characterized by desquamative skin inflammation, elevated IgE levels, broad allergic sensitizations, neonatal failure to thrive, and recurrent bacterial skin infections. It is known as an autosomal recessive disease with serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene (SPINK5) mutations leading to uninhibited protease activity and thus to a barrier defect and constant inflammation in the skin (Chavanas et al., 2000; Hovnanian, 2013) with an increased level of proinflammatory and T helper type 17 pathway cytokines (Paller et al., 2017). The composition of the skin microbiota is involved in the development and maintenance of the immune system (Belkaid and Hand, 2014). In NS, the immune system becomes dysfunctional (Eränkö et al., 2018; Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2016; Renner et al., 2009). The diversity of the normal skin microbiota increases during the first decade of life and resembles the microbiota of the mother (Zhu et al., 2019), but subsequently, the composition and temporal variation of an individual’s microbiome remain highly personalized (Flores et al., 2014). NS skin inflammation resembles those of atopic dermatitis and IgE syndrome, in which the diversity of the microbiota is reduced, and Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from skin lesions and during disease flares (Kong et al., 2012; Oh et al., 2013). The skin of adult patients with NS has recently been shown to have an increased relative abundance of Sta. aureus and Sta. epidermidis, where both species contributed to skin inflammation through bacterial proteases (Williams et al., 2020). Another study of three patients with NS reported that a higher proportion of Firmicutes and/or Staphylococcus correlated with transepidermal water loss, reflecting epidermal barrier impairment (Moosbrugger-Martinz et al., 2021). However, the factors contributing to the development of skin microbiome dysbiosis remain unknown. In this study, we analyzed the skin microbiota of 12 patients with NS (11 children, 7 of whom came from three families) and compared them with those of their healthy family controls (HFCs). In addition, we investigated possible correlations with infection history, allergen-specific IgE prevalence, and immune cell phenotypes of patients with NS.

Results

Common trends in skin microbiota

We compared the skin microbiome samples of 12 patients with NS with those of their corresponding HFCs to reduce the effects of environmental factors on the skin microbiome. The samples were collected from each patient from different anatomical areas according to the skin sites with specific bacteria being associated with moist, dry, and sebaceous microenvironments (Dréno et al., 2016), that is, abdomen near the umbilicus, buttocks, and sternum (Table 1 and Figure 1).
Table 1

Patients with NS and HFCs and Skin Sample Details

FamilyPatient (Age)HFC (Age)SexSample 1
Sample 2
Sample 3
Other
LocationAntibioticLocationAntibioticLocationAntibiotic
II.1 (10)FS, A, Bno
Mother (42)FS, A, Bno
IIII.1 (9)MTnoS, A, BnoS, A, BnoIVIG1, TC
Mother (38)FSnoS, A, BnoS
Brother 1 (7)MS, A, Bno
Brother 2 (6)MA, Bno
IIIIII.1 (12)MAnoS, A, Bno
III.2 (9)MSnoS, A, Bno
III.3 (6)FSnoS, A, Bno
Half-brother (14)MSno
IVIV.1 (2)MSA + CS, A, Bno
Sister (7)FSno
VV.1 (6)MSA + CS, A, BA + C
V.2 (2)MSA + CS, A, BA + C
Mother (29)FSno
VIVI.1 (4)MSno
VI.2 (2)MSA + C
VIIVII.1 (53)FS, A, Bno
VIIIVIII.1 (16)FS, A, Bno
Half-brother (9)MS, A, B

Abbreviations: A + C, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid; A, abdomen; B, buttock; F, female; HFC, healthy family control; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; M, male; NS, Netherton syndrome; S, sternum; T, left posterior thigh; TC, topical chlorhexidine on abdomen.

Location of sampling: S, A, B, T. Antibiotics labeled if used within 2 weeks before sampling. Oral antibiotics: A + C. Second sampling 2–7 months and third sampling 8 months after first sampling.

IVIG treatment started 3 months before the first sampling and continued during the study period at a dose of 400 mg/kg/month.

Figure 1

Clinical picture of patient with NS II.1. The patient has consented to the publication of the image. NS, Netherton syndrome.

Patients with NS and HFCs and Skin Sample Details Abbreviations: A + C, amoxicillin + clavulanic acid; A, abdomen; B, buttock; F, female; HFC, healthy family control; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; M, male; NS, Netherton syndrome; S, sternum; T, left posterior thigh; TC, topical chlorhexidine on abdomen. Location of sampling: S, A, B, T. Antibiotics labeled if used within 2 weeks before sampling. Oral antibiotics: A + C. Second sampling 2–7 months and third sampling 8 months after first sampling. IVIG treatment started 3 months before the first sampling and continued during the study period at a dose of 400 mg/kg/month. Clinical picture of patient with NS II.1. The patient has consented to the publication of the image. NS, Netherton syndrome. The alpha diversity was clearly diminished in patients with NS compared with that in HFCs (Figure 2a and b). The analysis of beta diversity clearly separated patients with NS and HFCs, with two exceptions (Figures 2c and 3). The microbiome read coverage was found to be generally lower in NS samples than in HFCs samples. Patients with NS had a median of 3.5 ± 3.74% reads assigned to the microbiome, whereas HFCs had a median of 32.4 ± 21.1% (Table 2) owing to a higher proportion of human reads from lesional skin in patients with NS, which was likely caused by the nature of the damaged skin. The diversity calculations were, therefore, also performed using the same number of reads from NS and HFC samples. This result was found to not affect the diversity.
Figure 2

Skin microbiome alpha and beta diversities of patients with NS versus HFCs. (a) Shannon diversity index of patients with NS, HFCs, and NTC. Significant differences between groups were found (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.001). (b) Shannon diversity index divided by the skin site. Significant differences between groups were found (P < 0.05). (c) MDS-based ordination of the samples using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Samples clustered by clinical status. A, C, TC on abdomen within 2 weeks before sampling. (d) MDS-based ordination, control, and patient samples were ordinated together; the visualization was split into two identical axes to highlight the site-specific dynamics. ∗∗∗∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.0001. A, amoxicillin; C, clavulanic acid; HFC, healthy family control; MDS, multidimensional scaling; NS, Netherton syndrome; NTC, negative control; TC, topical chlorhexidine.

Figure 3

Beta diversity of patients with NS versus HFCs. (a) Beta diversity distance between and within sample by clinical group based on the Jaccard similarity coefficient. (b) Cluster dendrogram generated using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Samples clustered by clinical status with the exception of two samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome; NTC, negative control.

Table 2

Metagenomic Sequence Read Count Data

Subject ID1Skin Site2Sampling DateClinical GroupTotal ReadsTrimmed Reads% after TrimmedHuman ReadsNonhuman Reads% Nonhuman Reads
VIII.halfbrotherButtock 16 October 2015Control4.22E + 074.14E + 0797.975.91E + 063.55E + 0785.71
II.brother2Buttock 48 September 2015Control2.15E + 072.12E + 0798.714.14E + 061.71E + 0780.48
II.brother1Abdomen 48 September 2015Control2.37E + 072.34E + 0798.708.14E + 061.53E + 0765.23
II.motherAbdomen 310 August 2015Control4.26E + 074.12E + 0796.931.49E + 072.63E + 0763.80
II.motherButtock 310 August 2015Control2.64E + 072.55E + 0796.711.35E + 071.20E + 0747.12
III.halfbrotherSternum 19 July 2015Control8.46E + 068.09E + 0695.654.45E + 063.64E + 0645.02
I.motherAbdomen 112 August 2015Control3.57E + 073.48E + 0797.572.09E + 071.39E + 0739.98
II.motherSternum 216 June 2015Control4.68E + 054.38E+0593.592.66E + 051.72E + 0539.26
II.brother1Buttock 48 September 2015Control1.66E + 071.64E + 0798.451.09E + 075.51E + 0633.66
II.motherSternum 310 August 2015Control3.01E + 072.89E + 0795.851.95E + 079.37E + 0632.44
I.motherButtock 112 August 2015Control3.05E + 072.94E + 0796.352.00E + 079.37E + 0631.86
VIII.halfbrotherSternum 16 October 2015Control1.78E + 071.74E + 0797.651.23E + 075.14E + 0629.49
I.motherSternum 112 August 2015Control3.69E + 073.55E + 0796.142.59E + 079.65E + 0627.16
VIII.halfbrotherAbdomen 16 October 2015Control6.52E + 076.42E + 0798.384.80E + 071.62E + 0725.22
II.brother1Sternum 48 September 2015Control5.97E + 065.73E + 0695.984.37E + 061.36E + 0623.77
IV.sisterSternum 19 July 2015Control3.61E + 073.49E + 0796.592.74E + 077.49E + 0621.46
V.motherSternum 19 July 2015Control2.60E + 072.56E + 0798.472.07E+074.89E + 0619.09
II.motherSternum 128 January 2015Control2.26E + 072.22E + 0798.351.99E + 072.31E+0610.41
II.brother2Abdomen 49 September 2015Control6.16E + 076.05E + 0798.125.48E + 075.71E+069.45
II.1Sternum 312 August 2015Patient7.30E + 077.11E + 0797.295.34E + 071.77E + 0724.87
III.1Buttock 220 November 2015Patient2.47E + 072.36E + 0795.332.14E+072.14E + 069.08
I.1Sternum 110 August 2015Patient1.05E + 079.87E + 0694.439.07E + 068.02E + 058.13
VIII.1Abdomen 16 October 2015Patient2.54E + 072.37E + 0793.082.21E + 071.62E + 066.84
III.1Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient2.93E + 072.85E + 0797.082.66E + 071.84E+066.47
II.1Abdomen 312 August 2015Patient1.07E + 071.03E + 0796.209.62E + 066.35E+056.19
VII.1Abdomen 119 November 2015Patient2.79E + 072.69E + 0796.332.52E + 071.65E + 066.14
III.1Sternum 220 November 2015Patient2.30E + 072.22E+0796.692.09E + 071.33E + 065.98
III.2Sternum 19 July 2015Patient9.21E + 068.62E + 0693.578.12E + 065.04E + 055.84
III.2Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient2.61E + 072.40E + 0792.142.27E + 071.30E + 065.40
III.2Buttock 220 November 2015Patient1.92E + 071.75E + 0791.311.66E + 079.14E+055.22
VIII.1Sternum 16 October 2015Patient5.72E + 075.41E+0794.545.13E + 072.77E + 065.12
II.1Sternum 216 June 2015Patient1.14E + 071.10E+0795.721.04E + 075.56E + 055.08
I.1Abdomen 110 August 2015Patient4.07E + 073.95E + 0796.953.76E+071.91E + 064.84
VII.1Sternum 119 November 2015Patient1.06E + 071.02E + 0796.259.69E + 064.87E + 054.79
III.1Abdomen 19 July 2015Patient2.91E + 072.81E+0796.762.68E + 071.32E + 064.69
II.1Abdomen 48 September 2015Patient6.93E + 076.64E + 0795.816.35E + 072.89E + 064.36
V.1Buttock 220 November 2015Patient2.27E+072.15E + 0794.522.05E + 079.08E + 054.23
IV.1Sternum 220 November 2015Patient1.11E + 071.07E + 0796.131.03E + 074.28E + 054.00
III.3Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient1.66E+071.58E + 0795.081.52E + 076.29E + 053.98
III.2Sternum 220 November 2015Patient2.10E + 071.85E + 0788.281.79E + 076.43E + 053.48
V.2Buttock 220 November 2015Patient2.70E + 072.55E + 0794.392.46E+078.79E + 053.44
IV.1Sternum 19 July 2015Patient4.95E + 074.80E + 0796.914.64E + 071.64E + 063.41
III.3Sternum 19 July 2015Patient7.84E+067.49E + 0695.527.23E + 062.54E + 053.40
IV.1Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient4.94E + 074.82E + 0797.574.66E+071.53E + 063.19
VII.1Buttock 119 November 2015Patient1.58E + 071.51E + 0795.801.46E + 074.69E + 053.11
V.1Sternum 19 July 2015Patient3.68E + 073.47E+0794.183.37E + 071.05E + 063.02
III.3Buttock 220 November 2015Patient1.08E + 071.05E + 0797.071.02E + 073.09E+052.94
V.2Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient1.88E + 071.80E + 0795.741.75E + 075.29E + 052.93
V.1Abdomen 220 November 2015Patient3.13E + 072.98E + 0795.202.90E + 077.93E + 052.66
II.1Buttock 312 August 2015Patient1.80E + 071.73E + 0796.061.68E + 074.38E + 052.54
VIII.1Buttock 16 October 2015Patient2.94E+072.82E + 0796.002.76E + 076.60E + 052.34
V.1Sternum 220 November 2015Patient2.65E+072.51E + 0794.732.45E + 075.78E + 052.30
VI.1Sternum 19 July 2015Patient1.33E + 071.25E + 0794.561.23E+072.45E + 051.95
II.1Buttock 48 September 2015Patient2.16E + 072.09E + 0796.942.06E + 073.83E + 051.83
IV.1Buttock 220 November 2015Patient5.20E + 075.02E + 0796.534.94E + 077.95E + 051.58
III.3Sternum 220 November 2015Patient4.65E + 074.54E + 0797.684.47E + 077.17E + 051.58
II.1Left posterior thigh 128 January 2015Patient1.22E + 071.16E + 0795.271.15E + 071.62E + 051.39
VI.2Sternum 19 July 2015Patient2.42E + 072.34E + 0796.602.31E + 072.83E + 051.21
V.2Sternum 220 November 2015Patient2.76E + 072.65E + 0795.712.61E + 073.14E + 051.19
I.1Buttock 110 August 2015Patient2.57E + 072.28E+0788.472.25E + 072.54E + 051.12
V.2Sternum 19 July 2015Patient4.28E + 073.94E+0792.143.90E + 073.86E + 050.98
NTC20 November 2015NTC1.76E + 051.67E + 0595.384.57E + 041.22E + 0572.71

Abbreviations: ID, identification; NTC, negative control.

Samples in the order of nonhuman reads.

Roman number refers to a family.

Number refers to the sampling round.

Skin microbiome alpha and beta diversities of patients with NS versus HFCs. (a) Shannon diversity index of patients with NS, HFCs, and NTC. Significant differences between groups were found (Kruskal–Wallis, P < 0.001). (b) Shannon diversity index divided by the skin site. Significant differences between groups were found (P < 0.05). (c) MDS-based ordination of the samples using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Samples clustered by clinical status. A, C, TC on abdomen within 2 weeks before sampling. (d) MDS-based ordination, control, and patient samples were ordinated together; the visualization was split into two identical axes to highlight the site-specific dynamics. ∗∗∗∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.0001. A, amoxicillin; C, clavulanic acid; HFC, healthy family control; MDS, multidimensional scaling; NS, Netherton syndrome; NTC, negative control; TC, topical chlorhexidine. Beta diversity of patients with NS versus HFCs. (a) Beta diversity distance between and within sample by clinical group based on the Jaccard similarity coefficient. (b) Cluster dendrogram generated using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Samples clustered by clinical status with the exception of two samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome; NTC, negative control. Metagenomic Sequence Read Count Data Abbreviations: ID, identification; NTC, negative control. Samples in the order of nonhuman reads. Roman number refers to a family. Number refers to the sampling round. The use of systemic antibiotics or topical chlorhexidine during the 2 weeks before sampling did not have any significant effect on the NS skin microbiome (Figure 2c). The skin site variability of the microbiota was decreased in patients with NS and was more uniform among skin sites (Figure 2b) compared with that seen in HFCs. The differences between the skin microbiota of patients with NS and HFC were observed at every skin site but were less pronounced in the sternum (P = 0.015) than in the buttocks (P = 0.000456) or abdomen (P = 0.0055) (Figure 2b and d). Sta. aureus was the most common bacterium in NS skin (Figure 4), occurring in 97.6% of the NS samples. The next most commonly occurring bacteria were Micrococcus luteus (76.2%), Streptococcus agalactiae (71.4%), Sta. capitis (66.7%), Sta. epidermidis (50.0%), and Dermacoccus sp. PE3 (47.63%). Of the 30 most abundant species, Cutibacterium acnes and Mi. luteus dominated the HFC skin, except in two controls with Sta. epidermidis (Figure 4). Sta. aureus, Corynebacterium bovis, Prevotella bivia, Sta. agalactiae, Str. dysgalactiae, and Co. striatum were significantly more abundant in patients with NS (Figure 5), whereas Cu. acnes, Dermacoccus sp. Ellin185, Gordonia paraffinivorans, and Lactococcus lactis were significantly more abundant in the HFC skin (Figure 6). Anaerobic bacteria (such as P. bivia) were more abundant in HFCs than in patients with NS (P < 0.001), which is most likely attributed to more air exposure in the damaged skin of patients with NS.
Figure 4

Microbial composition of NS skin microbiome versus HFCs. Sp. level bar plot showing the top 30 most abundant species across all samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Figure 5

ANCOM abundance bar plots of differentially abundant species between HFCs and patients with NS. (a) Staphylococcus aureus, (b) Corynebacterium bovis, (c) Prevotella bivia, (d) Streptococcus agalactiae, (e) Str. dysgalactiae, and (f) C. striatum show an increasing trend from HFCs to patients with NS. ANCOM, analysis of composition of microbiomes; HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Figure 6

ANCOM abundance bar plots of differentially abundant species between clinical groups. (a) Cutibacterium acnes, (b) Dermacoccus sp. Ellin185, (c) Gordonia paraffinivorans, (d) Lactococcus lactis, (e) Malassezia globosa, and (f) Malassezia restricta show the decreasing trend from HFCs to patients with NS. ANCOM, analysis of composition of microbiomes; HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Microbial composition of NS skin microbiome versus HFCs. Sp. level bar plot showing the top 30 most abundant species across all samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. ANCOM abundance bar plots of differentially abundant species between HFCs and patients with NS. (a) Staphylococcus aureus, (b) Corynebacterium bovis, (c) Prevotella bivia, (d) Streptococcus agalactiae, (e) Str. dysgalactiae, and (f) C. striatum show an increasing trend from HFCs to patients with NS. ANCOM, analysis of composition of microbiomes; HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. ANCOM abundance bar plots of differentially abundant species between clinical groups. (a) Cutibacterium acnes, (b) Dermacoccus sp. Ellin185, (c) Gordonia paraffinivorans, (d) Lactococcus lactis, (e) Malassezia globosa, and (f) Malassezia restricta show the decreasing trend from HFCs to patients with NS. ANCOM, analysis of composition of microbiomes; HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. While looking for the relation of Sta. aureus with the other microbes, we found a negative correlation between Sta. aureus and Cu. acnes, both in NS and HFC skin samples (rho = −0.57). No other significant associations with Sta. aureus were found. Cu. acnes was positively correlated with the prevalence of Sta. epidermidis (rho = 0.55). In summary, the skin microbiome in NS showed clear differences from healthy skin microbiomes, including lower diversity and increased presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria, and these differences were independent of antibiotic use.

Fungal or viral colonization is sparse in NS skin

Although very little viral or fungal colonization was found in the skin of patients with NS, Cladosporium was found only in the HFC skin, whereas Malassezia globosa and Ma. restricta were more abundant in HFCs (Figure 6). Patient V.1 had Verruconis gallopava in his buttock sample. No human papillomavirus, molluscum contagiosum, or human polyomavirus DNA was found in the skin of patients with NS, in contrast to some HFC samples (Table 3).
Table 3

Viruses Found in HFC Skin Samples

SubjectSkin SiteVirusAbundance
I. motherButtockMolluscum contagiosum virus subtype 150,226.0
II. brother1ButtockHuman polyomavirus 6145.0
II. brother1ButtockHuman papillomavirus -177.0
II. brother2ButtockHuman papillomavirus -1649.0

Abbreviation: HFC, healthy family control.

Nonphage viruses’ abundance calculated by FastViromeExplorer.

Viruses Found in HFC Skin Samples Abbreviation: HFC, healthy family control. Nonphage viruses’ abundance calculated by FastViromeExplorer.

Variation in skin microbiota among siblings with NS

Three of the studied families had more than one patient with NS (Table 1). The two boys from family V had serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene (SPINK5) mutation, distinct from the other Finnish patients with NS (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2016), and their skin microbiomes were the most similar to each other in the whole cohort (Figure 7a). Patient V.1 had suffered from neonatal sepsis caused by Str. agalactiae (Group B Streptococcus), and both patients from this family had their skin colonized by Str. agalactiae (Figure 7b).
Figure 7

Skin microbiome of family V with two brothers with NS with antibiotic treatment at time of sampling. (a) Cluster dendrogram generated using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Family V NS brothers cluster together. (b) The most abundant species in the family. Infectious species indicated in red. NS, Netherton syndrome.

Skin microbiome of family V with two brothers with NS with antibiotic treatment at time of sampling. (a) Cluster dendrogram generated using a reference-free Mash distance clustering. Family V NS brothers cluster together. (b) The most abundant species in the family. Infectious species indicated in red. NS, Netherton syndrome. The three affected siblings of family III had the most aberrant immunological phenotype (Eränkö et al., 2018), and the sibling (III.1) with most reduced skin microbiota diversity had suffered the most from recurrent skin and ear infections among all the siblings (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Skin microbiome of family III with three siblings with NS (III.1, III.2, and III.3) and HFC (half-brother). (a) Shannon diversity index of the family. (b) Relative abundance by the number of species in different skin sites. (c) Most abundant species of the patient III.1 with NS in the different skin site. Infectious sp. indicated in red (P = 0.15). HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Skin microbiome of family III with three siblings with NS (III.1, III.2, and III.3) and HFC (half-brother). (a) Shannon diversity index of the family. (b) Relative abundance by the number of species in different skin sites. (c) Most abundant species of the patient III.1 with NS in the different skin site. Infectious sp. indicated in red (P = 0.15). HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. Patient VI.2 had antibiotic treatment while sampling; instead of Sta. aureus, the most dominant bacteria in his sample were Cu. acnes, Propionibacterium sp. 409-HC1, and Sta. haemolyticus, whereas Sta. aureus and Sta. capitis were the most prevalent in his brother’s skin (Figure 9). VI.1 had frequent conjunctivitis, and both brothers have had recurrent skin and ear infections.
Figure 9

Skin microbiome of family VI with two patients with NS (brothers, VI.1 and VI.2). The most abundant species in the family are shown. Patient VI.2 had antibiotic treatment at the time of sampling. The number of bacteria that cause infections (in red) is lower during antibiotic use. NS, Netherton syndrome.

Skin microbiome of family VI with two patients with NS (brothers, VI.1 and VI.2). The most abundant species in the family are shown. Patient VI.2 had antibiotic treatment at the time of sampling. The number of bacteria that cause infections (in red) is lower during antibiotic use. NS, Netherton syndrome.

Association of lifetime skin infections with skin microbiota

Because patients with NS are prone to bacterial infections, we looked for associations between the skin microbiome and patients’ lifetime infection history. On an average, there were more skin infections, otitis, and conjunctivitis in patients with NS than in peers without NS (Table 4; Eränkö et al., 2018). Prolonged antibiotic therapy was common among patients with NS (8 of 11, 73%). Four patients with NS used systemic antibiotics during the 2 weeks preceding skin microbiome sampling.
Table 4

Infections and Antibiotic Use in the Pediatric Patients with NS Studied

Family and Patient CodeAge (y)Antibiotic Use in Infancy1Antibiotic Prophylaxis2Bacterial Skin Infections3Conjuctivitis4External Otitis5Lifetime Infection Score6
I.111121116
II.1710123208
III.113102014
III.210000000
III.37000000
IV.13110013
V.177111003
V.24121015
VI.16111216
VI.23121015
VIII.117111014

Abbreviation: NS, Netherton syndrome; PVL, Panton-Valentine leucocidin.

Source: modified from Eränkö et al. (2018).

0 = no, 1 = yes.

0 = no, 1 = yes, for 1–1.5-year period, 2 = yes, for longer than 1.5 years.

0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, 2 = recurrent infections at age >1.5 years, 3 = recurrent infections at age >1.5 years, additionally recurrent Staphylococcus aureus (PVL) abscesses.

0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, 2 = frequent conjunctivitis or constant need for antibiotic eye drops.

0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = frequent otitis or constant need for topical antibiotics; case VIII.1 had recurrent otitis media.

Sum of the following scores: antibiotics in infancy, antibiotic prophylaxis, bacterial skin infections, conjunctivitis, and external otitis.

Suffered from sepsis after the neonatal period caused by S. aureus or S. epidermidis.

Infections and Antibiotic Use in the Pediatric Patients with NS Studied Abbreviation: NS, Netherton syndrome; PVL, Panton-Valentine leucocidin. Source: modified from Eränkö et al. (2018). 0 = no, 1 = yes. 0 = no, 1 = yes, for 1–1.5-year period, 2 = yes, for longer than 1.5 years. 0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, 2 = recurrent infections at age >1.5 years, 3 = recurrent infections at age >1.5 years, additionally recurrent Staphylococcus aureus (PVL) abscesses. 0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, 2 = frequent conjunctivitis or constant need for antibiotic eye drops. 0 = as in the age group usually, 1 = frequent otitis or constant need for topical antibiotics; case VIII.1 had recurrent otitis media. Sum of the following scores: antibiotics in infancy, antibiotic prophylaxis, bacterial skin infections, conjunctivitis, and external otitis. Suffered from sepsis after the neonatal period caused by S. aureus or S. epidermidis. However, we could not find a statistically significant association between lifetime infections and skin microbiota alpha diversity (P = 0.45) (Figure 10).
Figure 10

Association between lifetime infections and skin microbiome diversity in patients with NS. Association between lifetime infection score (x-axis: sum of the scores of 0–3 for antibiotic use in infancy, antibiotic prophylaxis, bacterial skin infections, conjunctivitis, and external otitis) and microbiome diversity measured by the Shannon index (y-axis) (P = 0.43). NS, Netherton syndrome.

Association between lifetime infections and skin microbiome diversity in patients with NS. Association between lifetime infection score (x-axis: sum of the scores of 0–3 for antibiotic use in infancy, antibiotic prophylaxis, bacterial skin infections, conjunctivitis, and external otitis) and microbiome diversity measured by the Shannon index (y-axis) (P = 0.43). NS, Netherton syndrome.

No correlation between allergic sensitization and skin microbiota

Patients with NS become sensitized early in life and develop multiple allergic symptoms ranging from asthma to anaphylactic reactions (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2014; Hovnanian, 2013; Sun and Linden, 2006). To investigate the association between allergic sensitization and skin microbiota, we used total IgE and allergen component–specific IgE levels in patient sera. For statistical comparison, the allergen components were first grouped as aeroallergens, food allergens, and others and then grouped as food allergens, aeroallergens, pollen allergens, pan-allergens, lipid transfer protein allergens, and others. We analyzed all groups separately and also combined them but could not find any significant correlations between allergic sensitization and microbiota diversity or Sta. aureus colonization (data not shown). Neither did serum total IgE associate with microbiome diversity (P = 0.13) nor with Sta. aureus relative abundance (P = 0.21).

Skin microbiota diversity and Sta. aureus abundance associate with NK cells

We analyzed whether the skin microbiota diversity was associated with any specific lymphocyte or NK cell subclass, which we have previously shown to be altered in these same patients with NS (Eränkö et al., 2018). Statistically significant associations were found for the Shannon diversity index and CD57+ and/or CD8++ T cells (Figure 11). Patients with NS with a lowered effector memory CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells had lower microbial diversity than patients with elevated corresponding cell numbers (P < 0.05). Furthermore, Sta. aureus relative abundance correlated with the proportion of circulating CD27+ and/or CD56 bright (Figure 12a) and CD57+ and/or NK cells (Figure 12b). In both cases, patients with the indicated cell population above reference values had a lower Sta. aureus abundance (P < 0.05). We previously showed the proportion of CD27+ NK cells to be significantly decreased in these same patients with NS (Eränkö et al., 2018).
Figure 11

Association between CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells and microbiota diversity measured by the Shannon index. The x-axis indicates the proportion of CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells: 0 = within reference values, 1 = below reference value, 2 = above reference value (P = 0.014). The reference values have been described in detail by Eränkö et al. (2018). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05.

Figure 12

Association between lymphocyte or NK cell subclass cells and (a) CD27+ and/or CD56bright (P = 0.029) and (b) CD57+ and/or NK cells show a significant association with S. aureus abundance (P = 0.021). 0 = normal limits, 2 = above reference value. The reference values have been described in detail by Eränkö et al. (2018). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05.

Association between CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells and microbiota diversity measured by the Shannon index. The x-axis indicates the proportion of CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells: 0 = within reference values, 1 = below reference value, 2 = above reference value (P = 0.014). The reference values have been described in detail by Eränkö et al. (2018). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05. Association between lymphocyte or NK cell subclass cells and (a) CD27+ and/or CD56bright (P = 0.029) and (b) CD57+ and/or NK cells show a significant association with S. aureus abundance (P = 0.021). 0 = normal limits, 2 = above reference value. The reference values have been described in detail by Eränkö et al. (2018). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05.

Staphylococcal virulence toxins and proteases associate with recurrent skin infections in NS

Sta. aureus cysteine proteases staphopain A (ScpA) and staphopain B (SspB) as well as Sta. epidermidis extracellular cysteine protease have been related to skin damage in adult patients with NS (Williams et al., 2020). In the pediatric patients with NS, we found, as expected, an increased ScpA and SspB genomic DNA abundance in subjects with elevated Sta. aureus abundance (Figure 13). ScpA and SspB were most increased in patient II.1, in whom Sta. aureus was the most dominant species. Notably, his healthy mother had the second highest level of ScpA and the highest level of SspB among the HFC.
Figure 13

Number of reads corresponding to (a) ScpA and (b) SspB genes normalized per library size for each sample. The points show the abundance of S. aureus in the samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Number of reads corresponding to (a) ScpA and (b) SspB genes normalized per library size for each sample. The points show the abundance of S. aureus in the samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. The Sta. epidermidis extracellular cysteine protease genomic DNA was only found in the control group, which was expected as Sta. epidermidis is more abundant in this group (Figure 14a). The metagenomic analysis showed that DNA for the secreted membrane–injuring toxin PSMα operon was elevated in samples with Sta. aureus (Figure 14b).
Figure 14

Number of reads corresponding to (a) EcpA and (b) PSMα genes normalized per library size for each sample. The points show (a) S. epidermidis and (b) S. aureus abundance in the samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome.

Number of reads corresponding to (a) EcpA and (b) PSMα genes normalized per library size for each sample. The points show (a) S. epidermidis and (b) S. aureus abundance in the samples. HFC, healthy family control; NS, Netherton syndrome. We found a correlation between ScpA abundance and bacterial skin infections because ScpA was found to be increased in patients aged over 1.5 years with recurrent bacterial skin infections (P < 0.05) (Figure 15). The SspB abundance correlated with frequent occurrence of conjunctivitis (P < 0.01). The SspB was also increased in patients with a history of sepsis after the neonatal period (P < 0.05), caused by Sta. aureus or Sta. epidermidis.
Figure 15

Association between infection data and (a) PSMα is increased in patients with antibiotics in infancy (P = 0.048). (b) The ScpA gene is more abundant in patients with recurrent skin bacterial infection. No = as in the age group usually, Yes = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, >1.5 years and at age > 1.5 years, respectively (P = 0.035). (c) SspB is increased in patients with conjunctivitis. No = as in the age group usually, Yes = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, Frequent = frequent conjunctivitis or constant need for antibiotic eye drops (P = 0.0068). (d) SspB is more abundant in patients with sepsis caused by S. aureus or S. epidermidis. Although the statistical calculation has shown significance, the sample numbers are relatively small (P = 0.037). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05 and ∗∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.01.

Association between infection data and (a) PSMα is increased in patients with antibiotics in infancy (P = 0.048). (b) The ScpA gene is more abundant in patients with recurrent skin bacterial infection. No = as in the age group usually, Yes = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, >1.5 years and at age > 1.5 years, respectively (P = 0.035). (c) SspB is increased in patients with conjunctivitis. No = as in the age group usually, Yes = recurrent infections at 1–1.5 years of age, Frequent = frequent conjunctivitis or constant need for antibiotic eye drops (P = 0.0068). (d) SspB is more abundant in patients with sepsis caused by S. aureus or S. epidermidis. Although the statistical calculation has shown significance, the sample numbers are relatively small (P = 0.037). ∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.05 and ∗∗Wilcoxon, P < 0.01.

Discussion

We report a remarkably diminished skin microbiota alpha diversity in a cohort of 12 predominantly pediatric patients with NS as compared with healthy, cohabitating age-matched siblings, and parents. In addition, the skin site variability was decreased in patients with NS compared with that in HFCs. The main difference regarding bacterial species was the dominance of Sta. aureus in multiple skin sites of these pediatric patients with NS. These findings are concordant with two other recent studies on teenage and adult patients with NS (Moosbrugger-Martinz et al., 2021; Williams et al., 2020). However, we did not detect Sta. epidermidis dominance in NS skin, as reported by Williams et al. (2020),but detected it in the HFC samples. We found anaerobic bacteria to be more abundant in HFC samples than in patients with NS, as has been previously found for atopic dermatitis (Fyhrquist et al., 2019). In HFCs, we found the same microbes that are commonly found on healthy skin (Dréno et al., 2016). In contrast with adult patients with NS, the skin of our patients with NS was practically erythrodermic at all times, and no truly healthy skin sites could be identified. In addition, there was a wider skin site sampling in this study, and the reference skin samples were environmentally closer than those reported by Williams et al. (2020). The lack of viral and fungal colonization fits well with the infrequency of clinical viral or fungal infections despite the immunological dysfunction observed in patients with NS (Eränkö et al., 2018) and the recent observations in three other patients with NS (Moosbrugger-Martinz et al., 2021). One of our patients had V. gallopava, which is found in hot springs and is a neurotropic opportunist in immunocompromised humans (Samerpitak et al., 2014). We had the unique opportunity to analyze the skin microbiome of three families with two or three patients with NS each. Some of the siblings with NS showed extremely similar microbiomes. In one of the families, the child with NS with the most reduced skin microbiome diversity had suffered from recurrent skin and external ear infections. However, in the whole NS cohort, we could not find any significant association between lifetime infections and microbiome diversity. Instead, we found an association of skin microbiota diversity with specific lymphocyte and NK cell subclasses, which we have previously shown to be altered in the same patients with NS and to correlate with skin infection frequency and a need for antibiotic usage (Eränkö et al., 2018). NK cells are known to be instrumental in innate immune responses, in particular by rapidly producing cytokines necessary to control certain bacterial, parasitic, and viral infections. We found a significant positive association between skin microbiome Shannon diversity and the CD57+ and/or CD8++ T cell proportion, a T-cell subclass known to control several viral infections and also known to be involved in staphylococcal superantigen–induced immune responses (Ami et al., 2002). The CD57+ and/or CD8+ T cells are absent in newborns, but this T-cell subtype percentage is increased in chronic immune activation and clinical conditions with functional immune deficiency (Focosi et al., 2010), including NS (Eränkö et al., 2018). Accumulating evidence also points to the utility of peripheral blood CD57+ T cells to indicate a threshold beyond which the risk of opportunistic infections becomes significant (Focosi et al., 2010). The circulating CD27+ and/or CD56bright and CD57+ and/or NK cells, whose proportion correlated with lower Sta. aureus abundance in the skin, have previously been shown to become activated on stimulation with Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium (D’Orazio et al., 1995). The CD27+ and/or CD56bright NK cells denote regulatory NK cells, which are abundant cytokine producers, albeit a numerical minority (6%) of human peripheral blood NK cells (Cooper et al., 2001). The CD57 expression on peripheral NK cells identifies the final stages of maturation and is associated with chronic infections (Focosi et al., 2010). The CD57+ NK cells are highly cytotoxic, and their presence seems to be beneficial in several noncommunicable diseases. As known previously, patients with NS suffer from multiple allergies (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2014; Hovnanian, 2013). Sta. aureus colonization has been associated with food sensitization and allergy in children with eczema (Jones et al., 2016); thus, we anticipated that the same association could be found in patients with NS with a predominance of Sta. aureus in their skin. We have previously speculated whether the loss of LEKTI inhibition of allergen proteases combined with an increased allergen penetration due to the barrier defect could contribute to the rapid allergic sensitization observed in patients with NS (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2014). However, the results of this study suggest that skin microbiota does not associate with allergic sensitization, a result possibly influenced by the limited number of patients. Because the role of Sta. aureus is central both in atopic dermatitis and NS skin inflammation (Liu et al., 2017; Nakagawa et al., 2017; Nakatsuji et al., 2016; Williams et al., 2019, 2017), we also investigated the Sta. aureus–derived cysteine proteases ScpA and SspB along with Sta. epidermidis extracellular cysteine protease. Williams et al. (2020) recently reported that these proteases contribute to the increased protease activity in NS skin. We found Sta. aureus ScpA genomic DNA to be elevated in most NS skin samples, and a high frequency was also detected in one healthy skin sample, whereas the SspB protease showed up at lower levels in some HFC skin samples. Williams et al. (2020) found a strong correlation between the presence of staphylococcal PSMα and NS disease severity. They also demonstrated how Sta. aureus PSMα toxin peptides exacerbated proteolytic activity in NS skin lacking LEKTI, an epidermal serine protease inhibitor. We found a statistically significant correlation between PSMα abundance and the history of antibiotic usage in infancy. We also found a correlation between ScpA abundance and a history of recurrent bacterial skin infections. Likewise, the SspB abundance correlated with recurrent conjunctivitis and was increased in patients with a history of postneonatal sepsis caused by Sta. aureus or Sta. epidermidis. In summary, the clinical relevance of Sta. aureus dominance in the NS skin microbiome is clear and seems to be mediated through secreted staphylococcal virulence factors but also associates with circulating CD57+ T cell and NK cell values.

Materials and Methods

Patients

Patients with NS (n = 12; 4 female, 8 male) aged 2–15 years and one adult aged 53 years were recruited from the Helsinki University Hospital, Finland and the Seinäjoki Central Hospital, Finland. HFC were recruited from among the family members. V.1 and V.2; VI.1 and VI.2; and patients III.1, III.2, and III.3 were siblings. All patients from families I, II, III, IV, and V had the same serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene SPINK5 mutation (c.652C>T (p.Arg218X)). Additional serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 gene (SPINK5) mutations were found in families VI (c.652C>T (p.Arg218X) and c.1220+1 G>C (IVS13+1 G>C)), VII (c.1772delT p.(Leu591Glnfs∗124)), and VIII (c.1048C>T p.(Arg350∗) and c.2098G>T p.(Gly700∗)). We previously reported that patients with the same mutation seemed to have a similar clinical phenotype (Hannula-Jouppi et al., 2014). The skin of all the patients was widely erythematous, scaly, and almost erythrodermic (Figure 1). Some of the patients received oral or topical antibiotics for 2 weeks before sampling (Table 1). The study was approved by the Coordinating Ethical Review Board of Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District, Helsinki, Finland (number 91/13/03/00/11) and conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The parents of the underaged patients or the adult patients themselves gave written informed consent.

Infection history

Data were collected from patient records of the Helsinki University Hospital and Seinäjoki Central Hospital, covering the time period April 2003 to October 2017. Adult patient VII.1 had to be excluded from the infection analyses owing to limited childhood patient record. We summed and scored each patient’s recurrent systemic, skin, ocular, and ear infections and the need for long-time prophylactic antibiotics (Table 4), as has been done in a previous study with this Finnish cohort (Eränkö et al., 2018).

Collection of skin microbiome

Skin samples were collected from seven siblings with NS of three families and five additional cases with NS with HFC as reference. The sampling areas included sternum, abdomen near the umbilicus, and buttocks. One patient was also sampled at the posterior thigh (severe lesional area) (Table 1). Samples were taken with no prior cleaning or preparation of the skin surface using sterile gloves. After placing a sterile plastic cylinder (2.5 cm in diameter) onto the appropriate skin area, 1.5-ml PBS (pH: 7.4) was supplemented into the cylinder and the skin was gently rubbed with a glass rod in a circular motion 10 times to the left and to the right. Subsequently, the microbiome-enriched PBS was collected with a sterile pipette and stored at −80°C.

Serum IgE levels and Immunocap ISAC microarray

Serum immunoglobulin levels for total IgE and specific IgE to 112 allergen components (ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray) were determined according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden). Data were analyzed with the Microarray Image Analysis Software (version 1.2.4). Allergen-specific IgE-antibodies were expressed in arbitrary ISAC Standardized Units. We developed an allergen score for the analyses: the raw points for all food allergens, aeroallergens, and other allergens were summed separately and combined as follows. The ISAC Standardized Unit values < 0.3, representing negative to very low, were scored 0; values 0.3–0.9, representing low, were scored 1; values 1.0–14.9, representing moderate to high, were scored 2; and values ≥15, representing very high, were scored 3. Thereafter, the participants were divided into three groups: not allergic (low score), moderately allergic (medium score), and very allergic (high score).

Generation and analysis of metagenomics shotgun data

The microbiome-enriched PBS samples had the DNA extracted by Qiagen’s Pathogen Lysis Tubes (catalog number: 19092; Qiagen, Hilden Germany) and the QIAamp UCP Pathogen Mini Kit (catalog number: 50214; Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries of 350 base pairs for shotgun sequencing were prepared using the ThruPLEX DNA-seq kit (Rubicon Genomics, Ann Arbor, MI) and sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2500 technology (2 × 150 base pairs; Illumina, San Diego, CA). The resulting reads were quality controlled and adapter trimmed by Trim Galore (version 0.4.1), followed by the removal of mapped reads to the human genome GRCh38 (GenBank accession number: GCA_000001405.15) using Bowtie (version 2.3.2) (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). Species-level taxonomic profiling was performed with Kraken (version 2.07—Beta-diversity) (Wood et al., 2019) by using a database built with reprDB (Zhou et al., 2018). The abundance of species was computed using Bracken (version 1.0.0) (Lu et al., 2017). Microbial community richness and diversity measures were calculated with the vegan R package (Oksanen et al., 2019). Bacterial aerobes versus strict anaerobes were determined according to Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Ruan, 2013). The distance between samples was estimated using Mash (version 2.0) (Ondov et al., 2016). A differential abundance testing of taxa across clinical groups was conducted using ANCOM from R package version 2.1 (Mandal et al., 2015), using the skin site as random effects and the family number as covariant. The test was run with default parameters and Benjamini–Hochberg for multiple comparison correction. The correlation between the species was analyzed using the proper R package with rho metric (Quinn et al., 2019). Associations between skin infections, allergic symptoms, and NK cells were examined with the microbiome Shannon diversity index and the Sta. aureus amount by performing the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by the paired Wilcoxon test with Holm multiple comparison correction using the ggpubr R package (Kassambara, 2020). To identify the staphylococcal virulence factors among the samples, the filtered reads were mapped against four genes: (i) PSMα (GenBank: BK006301.1), (ii) ScpA (GenBank: AJ538362.1), (iii) SspB (GenBank: AF309515.1), and (iv) extracellular cysteine protease (GenBank: AJ298299.1) using Bowtie (version 2.3.2) (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012). The Kruskal–Wallis test was used for continuous variables, and the Wilcoxon test was used for the paired tests.

Data availability statement

The data analyzed during this study are included in this published article. Data sets related to this study have been submitted to the European Nucleotide Archive under the study reference number PRJEB39614.

ORCIDs

Veera Sillanpää: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1481-4702 Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira Soratto: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-6432 Elina Eränkö: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9493-7042 Mauricio Barrientos-Somarribas: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-9897 Katariina Hannula-Jouppi: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3864-2853 Björn Andersson: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4624-0259 Annamari Ranki: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0396

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: AR, EE, BA, KHJ, VS; Data Curation: BA, MBS, EE, TATS, VS; Formal Analysis: BA, MBS, EE, TATS, VS; Funding Acquisition: BA, AR; Investigation: EE, VS, AR, KHJ; Project Administration: AR, BA; Resources: AR, BA; Supervision: AR, BA; Writing - Original Draft Preparation: AR, VS, EE, MSB, TATS, BA; Writing - Review and Editing: VS, TATS, EE, MBS, KHJ, BA, AR
  34 in total

Review 1.  Netherton syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Joannie D Sun; Kenneth G Linden
Journal:  Int J Dermatol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.736

2.  Age and Mothers: Potent Influences of Children's Skin Microbiota.

Authors:  Ting Zhu; Xing Liu; Fan-Qi Kong; Yuan-Yuan Duan; Alyson L Yee; Madeline Kim; Carlos Galzote; Jack A Gilbert; Zhe-Xue Quan
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 8.551

3.  Staphylococcal enterotoxin B activates purified NK cells to secrete IFN-gamma but requires T lymphocytes to augment NK cytotoxicity.

Authors:  J A D'Orazio; G W Burke; J Stein-Streilein
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 5.422

4.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2.

Authors:  Ben Langmead; Steven L Salzberg
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 28.547

5.  IgE allergen component-based profiling and atopic manifestations in patients with Netherton syndrome.

Authors:  Katariina Hannula-Jouppi; Satu-Leena Laasanen; Hannele Heikkilä; Mirja Tuomiranta; Marja-Leena Tuomi; Sirpa Hilvo; Nicolas Kluger; Sirpa Kivirikko; Alain Hovnanian; Soili Mäkinen-Kiljunen; Annamari Ranki
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 10.793

6.  Staphylococcus aureus Induces Increased Serine Protease Activity in Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Michael R Williams; Teruaki Nakatsuji; James A Sanford; Alison F Vrbanac; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 8.551

7.  Analysis of composition of microbiomes: a novel method for studying microbial composition.

Authors:  Siddhartha Mandal; Will Van Treuren; Richard A White; Merete Eggesbø; Rob Knight; Shyamal D Peddada
Journal:  Microb Ecol Health Dis       Date:  2015-05-29

8.  Microbe-host interplay in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis.

Authors:  Nanna Fyhrquist; Gareth Muirhead; Stefanie Prast-Nielsen; Marine Jeanmougin; Peter Olah; Tiina Skoog; Gerome Jules-Clement; Micha Feld; Mauricio Barrientos-Somarribas; Hanna Sinkko; Ellen H van den Bogaard; Patrick L J M Zeeuwen; Gijs Rikken; Joost Schalkwijk; Hanna Niehues; Walter Däubener; Silvia Kathrin Eller; Helen Alexander; Davide Pennino; Sari Suomela; Ioannis Tessas; Emilia Lybeck; Anna M Baran; Hamid Darban; Roopesh Singh Gangwar; Ulrich Gerstel; Katharina Jahn; Piia Karisola; Lee Yan; Britta Hansmann; Shintaro Katayama; Stephan Meller; Max Bylesjö; Philippe Hupé; Francesca Levi-Schaffer; Dario Greco; Annamari Ranki; Jens M Schröder; Jonathan Barker; Juha Kere; Sophia Tsoka; Antti Lauerma; Vassili Soumelis; Frank O Nestle; Bernhard Homey; Björn Andersson; Harri Alenius
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Interplay of Staphylococcal and Host Proteases Promotes Skin Barrier Disruption in Netherton Syndrome.

Authors:  Michael R Williams; Laura Cau; Yichen Wang; Drishti Kaul; James A Sanford; Livia S Zaramela; Shadi Khalil; Anna M Butcher; Karsten Zengler; Alexander R Horswill; Christopher L Dupont; Alain Hovnanian; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Staphylococcus aureus Exploits Epidermal Barrier Defects in Atopic Dermatitis to Trigger Cytokine Expression.

Authors:  Teruaki Nakatsuji; Tiffany H Chen; Aimee M Two; Kimberly A Chun; Saisindhu Narala; Raif S Geha; Tissa R Hata; Richard L Gallo
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 8.551

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.