Literature DB >> 34908548

Impact of Intraoperative Data on Risk Prediction for Mortality After Intra-Abdominal Surgery.

Xinyu Yan1, Jeff Goldsmith1, Sumit Mohan2,3, Zachary A Turnbull4, Robert E Freundlich5, Frederic T Billings5, Ravi P Kiran3,6, Guohua Li3,7, Minjae Kim3,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk prediction models for postoperative mortality after intra-abdominal surgery have typically been developed using preoperative variables. It is unclear if intraoperative data add significant value to these risk prediction models.
METHODS: With IRB approval, an institutional retrospective cohort of intra-abdominal surgery patients in the 2005 to 2015 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was identified. Intraoperative data were obtained from the electronic health record. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We evaluated the performance of machine learning algorithms to predict 30-day mortality using: 1) baseline variables and 2) baseline + intraoperative variables. Algorithms evaluated were: 1) logistic regression with elastic net selection, 2) random forest (RF), 3) gradient boosting machine (GBM), 4) support vector machine (SVM), and 5) convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC). The sample was randomly divided into a training/testing split with 80%/20% probabilities. Repeated 10-fold cross-validation identified the optimal model hyperparameters in the training dataset for each model, which were then applied to the entire training dataset to train the model. Trained models were applied to the test cohort to evaluate model performance. Statistical significance was evaluated using P < .05.
RESULTS: The training and testing cohorts contained 4322 and 1079 patients, respectively, with 62 (1.4%) and 15 (1.4%) experiencing 30-day mortality, respectively. When using only baseline variables to predict mortality, all algorithms except SVM (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.83 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.69-0.97]) had AUROC >0.9: GBM (AUROC, 0.96 [0.94-1.0]), RF (AUROC, 0.96 [0.92-1.0]), CNN (AUROC, 0.96 [0.92-0.99]), and logistic regression (AUROC, 0.95 [0.91-0.99]). AUROC significantly increased with intraoperative variables with CNN (AUROC, 0.97 [0.96-0.99]; P = .047 versus baseline), but there was no improvement with GBM (AUROC, 0.97 [0.95-0.99]; P = .3 versus baseline), RF (AUROC, 0.96 [0.93-1.0]; P = .5 versus baseline), and logistic regression (AUROC, 0.94 [0.90-0.99]; P = .6 versus baseline).
CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative mortality is predicted with excellent discrimination in intra-abdominal surgery patients using only preoperative variables in various machine learning algorithms. The addition of intraoperative data to preoperative data also resulted in models with excellent discrimination, but model performance did not improve.
Copyright © 2021 International Anesthesia Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34908548      PMCID: PMC8682663          DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  29 in total

1.  POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit.

Authors:  G P Copeland; D Jones; M Walters
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Choosing the surgical mortality threshold for high risk patients with stage Ia non-small cell lung cancer: insights from decision analysis.

Authors:  J Dowie; M Wildman
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.139

3.  ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas J Hackett; Gildasio S De Oliveira; Umang K Jain; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Response to Comment on "Utilizing Machine Learning Methods for Preoperative Prediction of Postsurgical Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission".

Authors:  Calvin J Chiew; Nan Liu; Ting Hway Wong; Yilin E Sim; Hairil R Abdullah
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Relationship between Intraoperative Hypotension, Defined by Either Reduction from Baseline or Absolute Thresholds, and Acute Kidney and Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Vafi Salmasi; Kamal Maheshwari; Dongsheng Yang; Edward J Mascha; Asha Singh; Daniel I Sessler; Andrea Kurz
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Deep learning for risk assessment: all about automatic feature extraction.

Authors:  Christopher V Cosgriff; Leo Anthony Celi
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Accuracy of administrative data versus clinical data to evaluate carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.

Authors:  Rodney P Bensley; Shunsuke Yoshida; Ruby C Lo; Margriet Fokkema; Allen D Hamdan; Mark C Wyers; Elliot L Chaikof; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  Risk stratification tools for predicting morbidity and mortality in adult patients undergoing major surgery: qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Suneetha Ramani Moonesinghe; Michael G Mythen; Priya Das; Kathryn M Rowan; Michael P W Grocott
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Applying Latent Class Analysis to Risk Stratification for Perioperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Intraabdominal General Surgery.

Authors:  Minjae Kim; Melanie M Wall; Guohua Li
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Precrec: fast and accurate precision-recall and ROC curve calculations in R.

Authors:  Takaya Saito; Marc Rehmsmeier
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  3 in total

1.  Predicting Postoperative Mortality With Deep Neural Networks and Natural Language Processing: Model Development and Validation.

Authors:  Pei-Fu Chen; Lichin Chen; Yow-Kuan Lin; Guo-Hung Li; Feipei Lai; Cheng-Wei Lu; Chi-Yu Yang; Kuan-Chih Chen; Tzu-Yu Lin
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-05-10

2.  A PBPK Model of Ternary Cyclodextrin Complex of ST-246 Was Built to Achieve a Reasonable IV Infusion Regimen for the Treatment of Human Severe Smallpox.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Shuang Fu; Furun Wang; Chunmiao Yang; Lingchao Wang; Meiyan Yang; Wenpeng Zhang; Wu Zhong; Xiaomei Zhuang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Artificial intelligence and anesthesia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Valentina Bellini; Emanuele Rafano Carnà; Michele Russo; Fabiola Di Vincenzo; Matteo Berghenti; Marco Baciarello; Elena Bignami
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.