Literature DB >> 3490749

Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast.

E A Sickles, W N Weber, H B Galvin, S H Ominsky, R A Sollitto.   

Abstract

To compare the advantages of one-view vs two-view mammography screening, films were reviewed for 2500 consecutive asymptomatic women undergoing baseline mammography. To provide screening at low cost, examinations were limited to two radiographs per breast, one each in the craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique projections, with the understanding that those few patients with detected abnormalities would require additional mammograms, taken with an individually directed, problem-solving approach, at considerably higher cost. Two separate interpretations were made of each case, one using only the oblique projection images, the other using both oblique and craniocaudal views. Two-view interpretations not only identified more cancers than one-view readings (27 vs 25), they also required fewer additional mammograms to evaluate potential abnormalities (179 vs 642, 7% vs 26%). These advantages outweigh the additional radiation risk and added cost. Baseline screening mammography should be done with two views per breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3490749     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.147.6.1149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Reduction of false-positive recalls using a computerized mammographic image feature analysis scheme.

Authors:  Maxine Tan; Jiantao Pu; Bin Zheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses: four-view strategy for screening mammography.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Chuan Zhou; Yi-Ta Wu; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Exact calculations of average power for the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure.

Authors:  Deborah H Glueck; Jan Mandel; Anis Karimpour-Fard; Lawrence Hunter; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.968

4.  One and two view mammography in breast cancer. Many subjects in trial were not asked for consent.

Authors:  H Thornton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-02-24

5.  Film-screen mammography: comparison of views.

Authors:  L W Bassett; D H Bunnell; R H Gold; R Jahanshahi
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Digital Mammography in Young Women: Is a Single View Sufficient?

Authors:  Johannes Gossner
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

7.  Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography.

Authors:  Deborah H Glueck; Molly M Lamb; John M Lewin; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.173

8.  UKCCCR multicentre randomised controlled trial of one and two view mammography in breast cancer screening.

Authors:  N J Wald; P Murphy; P Major; C Parkes; J Townsend; C Frost
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-04

9.  The National Breast Screening Programme: the first 5,000 women screened in Northern Ireland.

Authors:  A J O'Doherty; J G Crothers; C W Majury
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  1991-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.