Literature DB >> 34907434

Bespoke Instruments: A new tool for addressing unmeasured confounders.

David B Richardson, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen.   

Abstract

Suppose that an investigator is interested in quantifying an exposure-disease causal association in a setting where the exposure, disease, and some potential confounders of the association of interest have been measured. However, there remains concern about residual confounding of the association of interest by unmeasured confounders. We propose an approach to account for residual bias due to unmeasured confounders. The proposed approach uses a measured confounder to derive a "bespoke" instrumental variable that is tailored to the study population and is used to control for bias due to residual confounding. The approach may provide a useful tool for assessing and accounting for bias due to residual confounding. We provide a formal description of the conditions for identification of causal effects, illustrate the method using simulations, and provide an empirical example concerning mortality among Japanese atomic bomb survivors.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort studies; instrumental variables; regression analysis; unmeasured confounding

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34907434      PMCID: PMC9430468          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   5.363


  18 in total

1.  Marginal structural models as a tool for standardization.

Authors:  Tosiya Sato; Yutaka Matsuyama
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Estimating causal effects from epidemiological data.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Evaluating short-term drug effects using a physician-specific prescribing preference as an instrumental variable.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Philip S Wang; Daniel H Solomon; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Instruments for causal inference: an epidemiologist's dream?

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Marginal Structural Models for Risk or Prevalence Ratios for a Point Exposure Using a Disease Risk Score.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Alexander P Keil; Alan C Kinlaw; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Reducing Bias Amplification in the Presence of Unmeasured Confounding Through Out-of-Sample Estimation Strategies for the Disease Risk Score.

Authors:  Richard Wyss; Mark Lunt; M Alan Brookhart; Robert J Glynn; Til Stürmer
Journal:  J Causal Inference       Date:  2014-09-01

8.  Spurious effects from an extraneous variable.

Authors:  I D Bross
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1966-06

9.  On the joint use of propensity and prognostic scores in estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated: a simulation study.

Authors:  Finbarr P Leacy; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Bias factor, maximum bias and the E-value: insight and extended applications.

Authors:  Alexandre Cusson; Claire Infante-Rivard
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.