Literature DB >> 34905128

Interobserver variability in the evaluation of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation: impact of radiological training and analysis of discordant cases.

Maria Carmela Andrisani1, Valentina Vespro1, Stefano Fusco2, Alessandro Palleschi3,4, Valeria Musso3,4, Andrea Esposito5, Alessandra Coppola6, Pierino Spadafora7, Francesco Damarco4, Vittorio Scaravilli8,9, Laura Cortesi10, Luigia Scudeller11, Anna Rita Larici12,13, Gianpaolo Carrafiello1,14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation are nonspecific and can lead to misinterpretation. The primary aim of our study was to assess the interobserver agreement in the evaluation of chest X-rays (CXRs) for PGD diagnosis and to establish whether a specific training could have an impact on concordance rates. Secondary aim was to analyze causes of interobserver discordances.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 164 patients who received bilateral lung transplantation at our institution, between February 2013 and December 2019. Three radiologists independently reviewed postoperative CXRs and classified them as suggestive or not for PGD. Two of the Raters performed a specific training before the beginning of the study. A senior thoracic radiologist subsequently analyzed all discordant cases among the Raters with the best agreement. Statistical analysis to calculate interobserver variability was percent agreement, Cohen's kappa and intraclass correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: A total of 473 CXRs were evaluated. A very high concordance among the two trained Raters, 1 and 2, was found (K = 0.90, ICC = 0.90), while a poorer agreement was found in the other two pairings (Raters 1 and 3: K = 0.34, ICC = 0.40; Raters 2 and 3: K = 0.35, ICC = 0.40). The main cause of disagreement (52.4% of discordant cases) between Raters 1 and 2 was the overestimation of peribronchial thickening in the absence of unequivocal bilateral lung opacities or the incorrect assessment of unilateral alterations.
CONCLUSION: To properly identify PGD, it is recommended for radiologists to receive an adequate specific training.
© 2021. Italian Society of Medical Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chest X-ray; Interobserver variability; Lung transplantation; Primary graft dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34905128     DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01438-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Med        ISSN: 0033-8362            Impact factor:   3.469


  11 in total

1.  Postoperative complications of lung transplantation: radiologic findings along a time continuum.

Authors:  Mayil S Krishnam; Robert D Suh; Anderanik Tomasian; Jonathan G Goldin; Chi Lai; Kathleen Brown; Poonam Batra; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Interobserver variability impairs radiologic grading of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Stefan Schwarz; Moritz Muckenhuber; Alberto Benazzo; Lucian Beer; Florian Gittler; Helmut Prosch; Sebastian Röhrich; Ruxandra Milos; Thomas Schweiger; Peter Jaksch; Walter Klepetko; Konrad Hoetzenecker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  M O Meade; R J Cook; G H Guyatt; R Groll; J R Kachura; M Bedard; D J Cook; A S Slutsky; T E Stewart
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Immunopathogenesis of Primary Graft Dysfunction After Lung Transplantation.

Authors:  Ankit Bharat; Daniel Kreisel
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Acute pulmonary edema after lung transplantation: the pulmonary reimplantation response.

Authors:  S U Khan; J Salloum; P B O'Donovan; E J Mascha; A C Mehta; M A Matthay; A C Arroliga
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Management of dysfunction in the transplanted lung: experience with 7 clinical cases. Washington University Lung Transplant Group.

Authors:  D A Haydock; E P Trulock; L R Kaiser; S R Knight; M K Pasque; J D Cooper
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Reperfusion edema after lung transplantation: radiographic manifestations.

Authors:  S Kundu; S J Herman; T L Winton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Latent class analysis identifies distinct phenotypes of primary graft dysfunction after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Rupal J Shah; Joshua M Diamond; Edward Cantu; James C Lee; David J Lederer; Vibha N Lama; Jonathan Orens; Ann Weinacker; David S Wilkes; Sangeeta Bhorade; Keith M Wille; Lorraine B Ware; Scott M Palmer; Maria Crespo; A Russell Localio; Ejigayehu Demissie; Steven M Kawut; Scarlett L Bellamy; Jason D Christie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Primary graft failure following lung transplantation.

Authors:  J D Christie; J E Bavaria; H I Palevsky; L Litzky; N P Blumenthal; L R Kaiser; R M Kotloff
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Radiological findings of complications after lung transplantation.

Authors:  Céline Habre; Paola M Soccal; Frédéric Triponez; John-David Aubert; Thorsten Krueger; Steve P Martin; Joanna Gariani; Jean-Claude Pache; Frédéric Lador; Xavier Montet; Anne-Lise Hachulla
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2018-08-15
View more
  3 in total

1.  Radiomics and machine learning analysis based on magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of liver mucinous colorectal metastases.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Federica De Muzio; Carmen Cutolo; Sergio Venanzio Setola; Federica Dell'Aversana; Francesca Grassi; Andrea Belli; Lucrezia Silvestro; Alessandro Ottaiano; Guglielmo Nasti; Antonio Avallone; Federica Flammia; Vittorio Miele; Fabiana Tatangelo; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.313

2.  An update on radiomics techniques in primary liver cancers.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Sergio Venazio Setola; Igino Simonetti; Diletta Cozzi; Giulia Grazzini; Francesca Grassi; Andrea Belli; Vittorio Miele; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  Infect Agent Cancer       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.965

Review 3.  Combined Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma: What the Multidisciplinary Team Should Know.

Authors:  Carmen Cutolo; Federica Dell'Aversana; Roberta Fusco; Giulia Grazzini; Giuditta Chiti; Igino Simonetti; Federico Bruno; Pierpaolo Palumbo; Luca Pierpaoli; Tommaso Valeri; Francesco Izzo; Andrea Giovagnoni; Roberto Grassi; Vittorio Miele; Antonio Barile; Vincenza Granata
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.