| Literature DB >> 34905067 |
Davide Cucchi1, Alessandra Menon2,3, Sonia Maggi4, Francesca Maria Feroldi4, Annalisa De Silvestri5, Max Julian Friedrich6, Matthias Dominik Wimmer6, Pietro Simone Randelli2,3,7.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Post-operative shoulder stiffness (SS) is a common complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff (RC) repair. The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate the role of surgical risk factors in the development of this complication, with special focus on the characteristics of the RC tears.Entities:
Keywords: Adhesive capsulitis; Arthroscopy; Frozen shoulder; Partial tear; Rotator cuff repair; Shoulder; Shoulder stiffness
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34905067 PMCID: PMC9522663 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04285-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ISSN: 0936-8051 Impact factor: 2.928
List of the surgery-related risk factors evaluated in the study, grouped into five categories
| Previous surgery | Open surgery |
| Arthroscopic surgery | |
| RC tear characteristics | Size of the tear (SCOI classification) |
| Associated subscapularis lesion | |
| Hardware | Hardware type (metal or all-suture) |
| Number of bone drills | |
| Associated procedures | LHB procedures |
| Subscapularis procedures | |
| Acromioplasty | |
| Associated capsular procedures | |
| Associated procedures on the acromioclavicular joint | |
| Biological augmentation | |
| OR-Time | Surgical time |
| Position in the OR-list |
OR operating room, SCOI Southern California Orthopaedic Institute
Summary of the main results for the study population
| Overall | Post-operative SS+ | Post-operative SS− | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open (Y/N ratio) | 0.04/0.96 | 0.05/0.95 | 0.04/0.96 | 0.6027 (n.s.) |
| Arthroscopic (Y/N ratio) | 0.09/0.91 | 0.21/0.79 | 0.08/0.92 | 0.0916 (n.s.) |
| Partial (Y/N ratio) | 0.18/0.82 | 0.42/0.58 | 0.15/0.85 | |
| C1 (Y/N ratio) | 0.23/0.77 | 0.16/0.84 | 0.23/0.77 | 0.5753 (n.s.) |
| C2 (Y/N ratio) | 0.32/0.68 | 0.32/0.68 | 0.32/0.68 | 1.0000 (n.s.) |
| C3–C4 (Y/N ratio) | 0.27/0.77 | 0.10/0.90 | 0.29/0.71 | 0.1082 (n.s. |
| SSc tear (Y/N ratio) | 0.17/0.87 | 0/1 | 0.18/0.82 | 0.0490 (n.s.) |
| Type (metal/all-suture ratio) | 0.92/0.08 | 0.89/0.11 | 0.92/0.08 | 0.6465 (n.s.) |
| No. bone drills | 1.00 [1.00–2.00] | 1.00 [1.00–1.00] | 1.00 [1.00–2.00] | 0.0202 (n.s.) |
| LHB (Y/N ratio) | 0.71/0.29 | 0.58/0.42 | 0.72/0.28 | 0.1942 (n.s.) |
| SSc repair (Y/N ratio) | 0.14/0.86 | 0/1 | 0.15/0.85 | 0.0828 (n.s.) |
| Acromioplasty (Y/N ratio) | 0.96/0.04 | 0.89/0.11 | 0.97/0.03 | 0.1447 (n.s.) |
| Capsule (Y/N ratio) | 0.04/0.96 | 0.05/0.95 | 0.04/0.96 | 0.5634 (n.s.) |
| ACJ (Y/N ratio) | 0.04/0.96 | 0.10/0.90 | 0.03/0.97 | 0.1447 (n.s.) |
| Biologics (Y/N ratio) | 0.04/0.96 | 0.10/0.90 | 0.04/0.96 | 0.2096 (n.s.) |
| Surgical time | 60.00 [50.00–80.00] | 45.00 [40.00–75.00] | 65.00 [50.00–80.00] | 0.0708 (n.s.) |
| OR Position (first 3/last 3 ratio) | 0.52/0.48 | 0.58/0.42 | 0.51/0.49 | 0.6370 (n.s.) |
Bold values indicate statistically significant differences
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquartile range (first and third quartiles, Q1–Q3), as appropriate, while the dichotomous variables are expressed in numbers of cases and frequencies. Dichotomous variables are expressed in numbers of cases and frequencies. After Bonferroni correction, statistical significance was set at a level of 0.01
ACJ acromioclavicular joint, LHB long head of the biceps, No. number, n.s. not significant, OR operating room, RC rotator cuff, SS post-operative shoulder stiffness, SS no post-operative shoulder stiffness, SSc Subscapularis, Y/N yes/no
Patient’s demographics
| Group | Overall | Post-operative SS+ | Post-operative SS − | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 59.70 (± 9.64) | 53.31 (± 9.81) | 60.31 (± 9.42) | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.66 (± 3.74) | 24.32 (± 4.07) | 25.78 (± 3.69) | 0.1030 (n.s.) |
| Gender (F/M ratio) | 0.52/0.48 | 0.89/0.11 | 0.48 /0.52 | |
| Dominant side (L/R ratio) | 0.04 /0.96 | 0.05 /0.95 | 0.04 /0.96 | 0.5634 (n.s.) |
| Surgery on dominant side (Y/N ratio) | 0.62/0.38 | 0.73/0.27 | 0.64/0.36 | 0.0814 (n.s.) |
| Follow-up (months) | 13.83 [8.85–20.92] | 10.76 [8.86–14.23] | 14.39 [8.85–21.35] | 0.1202 (n.s.) |
Bold values indicate statistically significant differences
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquartile range (first and third quartiles, Q1–Q3), as appropriate, while the dichotomous variables are expressed in numbers of cases and frequencies
BMI body mass index, F/M female/male, L/R left/right, n.s. not significant, SS post-operative shoulder stiffness, SS no post-operative shoulder stiffness, Y/N yes/no
Fig. 1Distribution of rotator cuff (RC) tears across the study population, according to the SCOI classification. A distribution of complete RC tears; B distribution of partial RC tears, grouped as macrocategories “articular”, “bursal” and “combined articular and bursal”; C distribution of partial RC tears, grouped for tear types, according to the Southern California Orthopaedic Institute (SCOI) classification; since in some tears, articular and bursal lesions coexisted, the sum of all columns exceeds 100%