Literature DB >> 34904958

Transformation and Evaluation of the MIMIC Database in the OMOP Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study.

Nicolas Paris1, Adrien Parrot1, Antoine Lamer1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the era of big data, the intensive care unit (ICU) is likely to benefit from real-time computer analysis and modeling based on close patient monitoring and electronic health record data. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC) is the first open access database in the ICU domain. Many studies have shown that common data models (CDMs) improve database searching by allowing code, tools, and experience to be shared. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) CDM is spreading all over the world.
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to transform MIMIC into an OMOP database and to evaluate the benefits of this transformation for analysts.
METHODS: We transformed MIMIC (version 1.4.21) into OMOP format (version 5.3.3.1) through semantic and structural mapping. The structural mapping aimed at moving the MIMIC data into the right place in OMOP, with some data transformations. The mapping was divided into 3 phases: conception, implementation, and evaluation. The conceptual mapping aimed at aligning the MIMIC local terminologies to OMOP's standard ones. It consisted of 3 phases: integration, alignment, and evaluation. A documented, tested, versioned, exemplified, and open repository was set up to support the transformation and improvement of the MIMIC community's source code. The resulting data set was evaluated over a 48-hour datathon.
RESULTS: With an investment of 2 people for 500 hours, 64% of the data items of the 26 MIMIC tables were standardized into the OMOP CDM and 78% of the source concepts mapped to reference terminologies. The model proved its ability to support community contributions and was well received during the datathon, with 160 participants and 15,000 requests executed with a maximum duration of 1 minute.
CONCLUSIONS: The resulting MIMIC-OMOP data set is the first MIMIC-OMOP data set available free of charge with real disidentified data ready for replicable intensive care research. This approach can be generalized to any medical field. ©Nicolas Paris, Antoine Lamer, Adrien Parrot. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (https://medinform.jmir.org), 14.12.2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  OMOP; big data; common data model; critical care; data reuse; digital health; electronic health records; health care; health data; health database; health informatics; intensive care; machine learning; open access database; open data

Year:  2021        PMID: 34904958      PMCID: PMC8715361          DOI: 10.2196/30970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JMIR Med Inform


  28 in total

1.  Validation of a common data model for active safety surveillance research.

Authors:  J Marc Overhage; Patrick B Ryan; Christian G Reich; Abraham G Hartzema; Paul E Stang
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Evaluation of alternative standardized terminologies for medical conditions within a network of observational healthcare databases.

Authors:  Christian Reich; Patrick B Ryan; Paul E Stang; Mitra Rocca
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Evaluation of a method to identify and categorize section headers in clinical documents.

Authors:  Joshua C Denny; Anderson Spickard; Kevin B Johnson; Neeraja B Peterson; Josh F Peterson; Randolph A Miller
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Clinical Data Reuse or Secondary Use: Current Status and Potential Future Progress.

Authors:  S M Meystre; C Lovis; T Bürkle; G Tognola; A Budrionis; C U Lehmann
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2017-09-11

5.  Data Enclaves for Sharing Information Derived From Clinical and Administrative Data.

Authors:  Richard Platt; Tracy Lieu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evaluating the impact of database heterogeneity on observational study results.

Authors:  David Madigan; Patrick B Ryan; Martijn Schuemie; Paul E Stang; J Marc Overhage; Abraham G Hartzema; Marc A Suchard; William DuMouchel; Jesse A Berlin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Evaluating common data models for use with a longitudinal community registry.

Authors:  Maryam Garza; Guilherme Del Fiol; Jessica Tenenbaum; Anita Walden; Meredith Nahm Zozus
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 6.317

8.  Creating a Common Data Model for Comparative Effectiveness with the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership.

Authors:  F FitzHenry; F S Resnic; S L Robbins; J Denton; L Nookala; D Meeker; L Ohno-Machado; M E Matheny
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.342

9.  Datathons and Software to Promote Reproducible Research.

Authors:  Leo Anthony Celi; Sharukh Lokhandwala; Robert Montgomery; Christopher Moses; Tristan Naumann; Tom Pollard; Daniel Spitz; Robert Stretch
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Promoting Secondary Analysis of Electronic Medical Records in China: Summary of the PLAGH-MIT Critical Data Conference and Health Datathon.

Authors:  Peiyao Li; Chen Xie; Tom Pollard; Alistair Edward William Johnson; Desen Cao; Hongjun Kang; Hong Liang; Yuezhou Zhang; Xiaoli Liu; Yong Fan; Yuan Zhang; Wanguo Xue; Lixin Xie; Leo Anthony Celi; Zhengbo Zhang
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2017-11-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  Sensors and digital medicine in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Géraldine Merle; Alexandre Parent-Harvey; Edward J Harvey
Journal:  OTA Int       Date:  2022-04-18
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.