Literature DB >> 34904191

Prognostic value of global deep white matter DTI metrics for 1-year outcome prediction in ICU traumatic brain injury patients: an MRI-COMA and CENTER-TBI combined study.

Louis Puybasset1,2,3,4, Vincent Perlbarg5, Jean Unrug6,7, Didier Cassereau7, Damien Galanaud7,8, Grégory Torkomian6, Valentine Battisti6, Muriel Lefort7, Lionel Velly9,10, Vincent Degos11,12,13, Guiseppe Citerio14,15, Éléonore Bayen7,16, Mélanie Pelegrini-Issac7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A reliable tool for outcome prognostication in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) would improve intensive care unit (ICU) decision-making process by providing objective information to caregivers and family. This study aimed at designing a new classification score based on magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion metrics measured in the deep white matter between day 7 and day 35 after TBI to predict 1-year clinical outcome.
METHODS: Two multicenter cohorts (29 centers) were used. MRI-COMA cohort (NCT00577954) was split into MRI-COMA-Train (50 patients enrolled between 2006 and mid-2014) and MRI-COMA-Test (140 patients followed up in clinical routine from 2014) sub-cohorts. These latter patients were pooled with 56 ICU patients (enrolled from 2014 to 2020) from CENTER-TBI cohort (NCT02210221). Patients were dichotomised depending on their 1-year Glasgow outcome scale extended (GOSE) score: GOSE 1-3, unfavorable outcome (UFO); GOSE 4-8, favorable outcome (FO). A support vector classifier incorporating fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity measured in deep white matter, and age at the time of injury was developed to predict whether the patients would be either UFO or FO.
RESULTS: The model achieved an area under the ROC curve of 0.93 on MRI-COMA-Train training dataset, and 49% sensitivity for 96.8% specificity in predicting UFO and 58.5% sensitivity for 97.1% specificity in predicting FO on the pooled MRI-COMA-Test and CENTER-TBI validation datasets.
CONCLUSION: The model successfully identified, with a specificity compatible with a personalized decision-making process in ICU, one in two patients who had an unfavorable outcome at 1 year after the injury, and two-thirds of the patients who experienced a favorable outcome.
© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deep white matter; Diffusion tensor imaging; Outcome; Prognosis; Traumatic brain injury

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34904191     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-021-06583-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   41.787


  30 in total

1.  Late recovery after traumatic, anoxic, or hemorrhagic long-lasting vegetative state.

Authors:  A Estraneo; P Moretta; V Loreto; B Lanzillo; L Santoro; L Trojano
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel-based approaches.

Authors:  Vincent Perlbarg; Louis Puybasset; Eléonore Tollard; Stéphane Lehéricy; Habib Benali; Damien Galanaud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.

Authors:  P J Basser; J Mattiello; D LeBihan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI): a prospective longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Andrew I R Maas; David K Menon; Ewout W Steyerberg; Giuseppe Citerio; Fiona Lecky; Geoffrey T Manley; Sean Hill; Valerie Legrand; Annina Sorgner
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Recovery from vegetative state of patients with a severe brain injury: a 4-year real-practice prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Alessio Baricich; A de Sire; E Antoniono; F Gozzerino; G Lamberti; C Cisari; M Invernizzi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2017 Jul/Sep

Review 6.  Disorders of consciousness after acquired brain injury: the state of the science.

Authors:  Joseph T Giacino; Joseph J Fins; Steven Laureys; Nicholas D Schiff
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Gravesteijn; Daan Nieboer; Ari Ercole; Hester F Lingsma; David Nelson; Ben van Calster; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  MRI for coma emergence and recovery.

Authors:  Robert D Stevens; Yousef Hannawi; Louis Puybasset
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.687

9.  Mapping traumatic axonal injury using diffusion tensor imaging: correlations with functional outcome.

Authors:  Virginia Newcombe; Doris Chatfield; Joanne Outtrim; Sarah Vowler; Anne Manktelow; Justin Cross; Daniel Scoffings; Martin Coleman; Peter Hutchinson; Jonathan Coles; T Adrian Carpenter; John Pickard; Guy Williams; David Menon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Ewout W Steyerberg; Nino Mushkudiani; Pablo Perel; Isabella Butcher; Juan Lu; Gillian S McHugh; Gordon D Murray; Anthony Marmarou; Ian Roberts; J Dik F Habbema; Andrew I R Maas
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 11.069

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.