Daehun Yun1, Soo Young Cho2, Wan Ju2, Eun Hyoung Seo2. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju 61661, South Korea. squall12@naver.com. 2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Kwangju Christian Hospital, Gwangju 61661, South Korea.
Core Tip: The occurrence of transverse myelitis (TM) secondary to varicella zoster virus (VZV) in immunocompetent patients is very rare. VZV-TM should be suspected when a patient visits an outpatient pain clinic with herpes zoster and presents neurological symptom(s). VZV-TM must be diagnosed early, by magnetic resonance imaging and/or cerebrospinal fluid analysis, since delayed intervention may allow for serious complications to develop. Also, early administration of a combination of antiviral drugs and corticosteroids may help resolve the condition and relieve the associated pain experienced by patients with TM secondary to VZV.
INTRODUCTION
Among the outpatient population of the pain clinic, a significant number of patient visits are prompted by pain caused by herpes zoster (HZ). Rarely, that pain is accompanied by neurological symptoms; however, in such cases, concomitant transverse myelitis (TM) should be suspected. We describe herein an unusual case of TM shortly following infection by the varicella zoster virus (VZV) and in conjunction with the usual symptomology in immunocompetent patient.VZV infection is very common and causes chickenpox and HZ[1]. The VZV infection itself is often complicated by postherpetic neuralgia (the most common neurologic complication), VZV vasculopathy, cerebellitis, meningoradiculitis, meningoencephalitis, myelitis, and ocular disease[2]. However, very few cases of VZV-TM have been reported, particularly in an immunocompetent patient. In order to accurately determine VZV as the cause of TM, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis is required, despite it being technically difficult to isolate VZV from CSF in VZV patients who have developed myelitis[3]. Additional evaluation of the neurological symptoms by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important for accurate diagnosis, which allows for the timely initiation of treatment and improves prognosis.
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints
A 46-year-old male presented to our hospital with complaint of painful vesicular eruption that had begun 3 d prior on his left chest and steadily progressed to involvement of his back.
History of present illness
The patient characterized the pain as ‘stinging’ and reported that it had begun after he participated in strenuous outdoor activities. He noted that the pain was accompanied by the vesicle eruption. He denied any history of trauma.
History of past illness
The patient denied VZV infection (i.e. chickenpox or any form of HZ) in his medical history.
Personal and family history
The patient’s other personal and family medical history was unremarkable for this case.
Physical examination
Vesicular eruption was present on the left chest to the axillary side, being limited within the T5-T8 dermatome (Figure 1). Using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the patient classified the stinging pain intensity of the vesicle eruption as 7.
Figure 1
Multiple vesicles on the axillary side of the left chest.
Multiple vesicles on the axillary side of the left chest.
Laboratory examinations
Blood tests for serum VZV immunoglobulin (Ig) M and VZV IgG were positive.
Imaging examinations
Chest computed tomography (CT) findings were nonspecific.
First diagnosis and treatment
The patient was diagnosed with HZ and ordered treatment with an antiviral drug (Clovir tablet, famciclovir at 250 mg bid; Dong Wha Pharm, Seoul, Korea), steroid (dexamethasone at 5 mg bid; Daewon Pharm, Busan, Korea), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (Naxozole tablet, esomeprazole strontium 24.6 mg/naproxen 500 mg bid (Hanmi Pharm, Seoul, Korea); Valentac, declofenac sodium at 75 mg/mL intramuscular injection (WhanIn Pharm, Seoul, Korea). After 1 wk, the patient showed improvement (Figure 2), with pain score reducing to VAS 2, and was discharged to home.
Figure 2
After 1 wk of hospitalization with antiviral and corticosteroid treatment, the vesicular eruption showed improvement.
After 1 wk of hospitalization with antiviral and corticosteroid treatment, the vesicular eruption showed improvement.However, 10 d after discharge, the patient returned to the hospital with complaint of pain recurrence (VAS 7-8) and was referred to our pain clinic. The same dermatome region showed re-eruption of the vesicles. Upon readmission, we administered ultrasound-guided erector spina plane block (commonly referred to as ESPB) and prescribed Lyrica Capsules (pregabalin at 75 mg bid; Pfizer, New York, NY, United States) and Targin prolonged-release (oxycodone at 5 mg/naloxone at 2.5 mg bid; Mundipharma, Seoul, Korea) for pain control. After the ESPB, the patient reported his pain reduced to VAS 2 and he was again discharged. At 2 d later, however, his pain worsened (VAS 6–7), and he returned to hospital and was again readmitted for pain control. This time, we inserted a patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) port. First, with the patient in prone position, an 18-G Tuohy needle was advanced using the paramedian approach at the thoracic spine level 9–10 under C-arm guidance. The epidural space was identified using loss-of-resistance technique and the contrast medium was injected. After confirming loss-of-resistance using C-arm, a flexible epidural catheter was passed cranially for about 2–3 cm and secured with the skin. Initially, the port was used to administer 300 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine at a continuous infusion rate of 4 mL/h via a disposable silicone balloon infuser (AutoFuser; ACE Medical, Beverly Hills, CA, United States). During the maintenance of PCEA, the patient reported his pain to be reduced to VAS 3. However, that night, the patient began to experience difficulty urinating as well as mild motor weakness (motor grade 4) and paresthesia in the bilateral distal lower extremities. The epidural catheter was removed immediately.
Further diagnostic work-up
A catheter tip culture was ordered but revealed no microorganism. To rule-out central nervous system infection, a T-spine MRI was performed. The T2-weighted images showed high signal intensity within the left spinal cord level T2-8 (Figure 3). The neurologic examination revealed mild paresthesia and normal motor strength at the bilateral distal lower-half extremities and hyperactive deep tendon reflex on the left side. The need for a CSF study was explained, but the patient’s guardian refused consent.
Figure 3
Spine magnetic resonance imaging made on admission. High signal intensity was apparent within the left spinal cord at level T2-8 on a T2-weighted image.
Spine magnetic resonance imaging made on admission. High signal intensity was apparent within the left spinal cord at level T2-8 on a T2-weighted image.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS
Based on the patient’s overall clinical presentation profile and imaging findings, he was diagnosed with VZV and myelitis.
TREATMENT
A 1-wk course of Clovir (acyclovir 250 mg tid; Myung-In Pharm), Maxipime (cefepime at 1 g bid; Boryung, Seoul, Korea) and Solondo tablet (prednisolone at 5 mg tid; Yuhan, Seoul, Korea) was initiated; in addition, the patient was administered Targin prolonged-release (oxycodone at 5 mg/naloxone at 2.5 mg bid; Mundipharma) and Lyrica Capsules (pregabalin at 75 mg bid; Pfizer) for pain control. The patient reported his pain to remain at about VAS 3 with these medications. The acyclovir as discontinued after the 1-wk course. A follow-up MRI was performed 3 wk later, and did not show any significant changes (Figure 4). At this time, the patient reported his pain to be well controlled (VAS 2) and findings from neurological examination were normal, allowing for discharge to home.
Figure 4
After 3 wk of antiviral and corticosteroid treatment, the high signal intensity had decreased slightly but had not resolved. A: Remaining high signal intensity at level T2-8 on a sagittal T2-weighted image; B: Level T5 on a coronal view.
After 3 wk of antiviral and corticosteroid treatment, the high signal intensity had decreased slightly but had not resolved. A: Remaining high signal intensity at level T2-8 on a sagittal T2-weighted image; B: Level T5 on a coronal view.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP
At the outpatient follow-up visit, conducted 1 mo after discharge, the patient had no neurologic symptoms but residual pain (VAS 2) that involved the area from the chest to the axillary side of the T5-T8 dermatome.
DISCUSSION
VZV is a human neurotropic and double-stranded DNA alpha-herpesvirus—the primary infection of which usually occurs during childhood and manifests as chickenpox[1]. After the primary infection, VZV becomes latent in the cranial root ganglia or dorsal root ganglia and can remain so for several decades; however, in elderly or immunocompromised individuals, it can become reactivated and recur as HZ[3,4].HZ itself is associated with a variety of complications, such as HZ vasculitis and ophthalmic, neurologic or visceral disease. The most common neurological complication is postherpetic neuralgia, a chronic neuropathic pain that persists after resolution of the HZ skin rash. Other complications include cranial nerve or peripheral nerve palsy, myelitis, meningoencephalitis, and stroke[2].Only 0.3% of patients reported with HZ manifestation experience TM[5]. In general, about 25%-50% of TM cases are caused by viral infections, including herpes virus or poliovirus. Though HZ infection is common, even in immunocompetent patients, it rarely progresses to TM. In Korea, in particular, only a few cases of TM secondary to VZV have been reported. Thus, TM secondary to VZV is an abnormal inflammatory finding; yet, the literature indicates that it can involve all parts of the spinal cord and that the pathogenesis may be related directly to the viral invasion and consequent axonal degeneration[6].Symptoms of TM usually develop over a period of hours to days and sometimes progress gradually over weeks. Mostly, it involves both sides of the body below the affected area of the spinal cord, but there are cases wherein it appears to affect only one side. Common signs and symptoms include pain (back, abdomen, chest), abnormal sensation, weakness in arms or legs, and bladder and bowel problems[7].TM is diagnosed based on the patient’s signs and symptoms, medical history, and clinical assessment of nerve function. If several diagnostic workups, including MRI, CSF analysis and complete blood count, provide evidence of inflammation, TM can be diagnosed after ruling out of other causes. MRI is one of the most effective diagnostic tools for TM secondary to VZV. In MRI, VZV myelitis is shown as hyperintensity in the spinal cord on T2-weighted images[8]. CSF analysis can then be done as a confirmatory test. Unfortunately, however, the procedure of CSF analysis is actually quite complicated; the VZV must first be separated from the CSF sample (invasively acquired) and must then demonstrate presence of VZV antigen via immunofluorescence assay. Indeed, in some cases reported in the literature, the VZV antibody was not found in the CSF sample and patient was diagnosed by MRI findings alone[3,9]. Likewise, no CSF study was conducted for our patient and the diagnosis was made according to the collective profile of clinical symptoms and MRI findings.In TM, early therapeutic intervention is essential to minimize complications and pain extent and duration suffered by the patient. The intervention must be tailored to the patient’s symptoms, since there is yet no standardized treatment regimen for TM secondary to VZV. Currently, the accepted treatment regimen should include an antibiotic, antiviral, high-dose corticosteroid, and intravenous Ig[3,6]. However, the efficacy of no specific treatment regimen has not been systematically demonstrated[10]. Of note, however, a study found that the combination of acyclovir and corticosteroids effectively reduced acute neuritis in VZV myelitis patients, and the most important prognostic factor was determined to be early medical intervention[5]. Another study showed that after administration of antivirals and steroids, the interval prior to symptom improvement ranged from 3 d to 9 d, with complete recovery seen in 10 d, but some patients were left with permanent neurological deficits, such as weakness or numbness, or had even progressed to encephalitis[11]. In our case, the early application of a combination treatment involving antivirals and corticosteroids significantly relieved the patient’s symptoms.
CONCLUSION
The occurrence of TM secondary to VZV in immunocompetent patients is very rare. VZV myelitis should be suspected when a patient visits the outpatient pain clinic with HZ showing neurological symptoms. VZV myelitis must be diagnosed early, using MRI and CSF study, since delayed intervention may allow for serious complications to develop. Also, early application of a combination treatment approach using antivirals and corticosteroids may benefit patients with TM secondary to VZV.
Authors: Robert H Dworkin; Robert W Johnson; Judith Breuer; John W Gnann; Myron J Levin; Miroslav Backonja; Robert F Betts; Anne A Gershon; Maija L Haanpaa; Michael W McKendrick; Turo J Nurmikko; Anne Louise Oaklander; Michael N Oxman; Deborah Pavan-Langston; Karin L Petersen; Michael C Rowbotham; Kenneth E Schmader; Brett R Stacey; Stephen K Tyring; Albert J M van Wijck; Mark S Wallace; Sawko W Wassilew; Richard J Whitley Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-01-01 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Martina Kovac; Himal Lal; Anthony L Cunningham; Myron J Levin; Robert W Johnson; Laura Campora; Antonio Volpi; Thomas C Heineman Journal: Vaccine Date: 2018-02-17 Impact factor: 3.641