| Literature DB >> 34903968 |
Yongxu Lin1,2, Juan Huang3,2, Tingfang Gao3, Yuanzi Wu3, Da Huang3, Fen Yan3, Zuquan Weng3.
Abstract
Antipyretic acetaminophen (APAP) is a commonly used drug that generally associates with liver injury. (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), an active polyphenol extracted from green tea, is extensively reported to have the potential to impact a variety of human diseases. However, few studies were reported regarding the protective effect of EGCG on APAP-induced liver injury and the mechanism is still unclear. In this study, in-vitro and in-vivo experiments were carried out to verify the hepatoprotective effect of EGCG against APAP-induced liver injury and explore the potential mechanism. Results indicated that EGCG effectively relieved the liver injury caused by APAP, as well as APAP-induced mitochondrial dysfunction. The protective role of EGCG was not only attributed to its antioxidant capacity; but also might be related to the protective effect on hepatic mitochondrial impairment; based on that, EGCG could improve the membrane potential and activities of the respiratory chain complexes in liver mitochondria. Our study casts a new light on the mechanism of EGCG's hepatoprotective effect and suggests that EGCG has considerable potential in developing tonics for relieving APAP-induced liver injury.Entities:
Keywords: APAP; EGCG; Liver Injury; Mitochondria; ROS
Year: 2021 PMID: 34903968 PMCID: PMC8653645 DOI: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.112727.13918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Pharm Res ISSN: 1726-6882 Impact factor: 1.696
Figure 1Effect of APAP on MMP and protective role of EGCG in-vitro. A: MMP observed by confocal fluorescence microscope; and 1: control; 2: 60 mM APAP; 3: 60 μM EGCG; 4: 60 μM EGCG + 60 mM APAP. The quantitative data about the ratio of red and green fluorescence were presented in panels B and C. The data are mean ± SD, n = 3. In B, *p < 0.05, compared to 5% DMSO; in C, *p < 0.05, compared to control, and #p < 0.05, compared to 60 mM APAP
Figure 2Effect of APAP on RCC I and III and protective role of EGCG in-vitro
Figure 3(A) ALT and (B) LDH levels in the plasma of SD rats with/without EGCG pre-treatment after being injected APAP for 8 h. Values represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, based on student's t-test
Figure 4Photomicrophs (original magnification × 200) of H&E-stained livers in rats
Incidence of pathological changes in liver tissues of SD rats with/without EGCG pre-treatment after being injected APAP for 8 h
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Centrilobular hypertrophy | 0 | 6 | 6 0 0 0 | 3 2 1 0 | 0 2 3 1* | 0 1 2 3* | 3 5 6 4* |
| 100 | 6 | 6 0 0 0 | 4 2 0 0 | 3 2 1 0* | 1 3 2 0* | 8 7 3 0# | |
| Ganuloma | 0 | 6 | 6 0 0 0 | 4 1 1 0 | 1 1 3 1* | 0 1 3 2* | 5 3 7 3* |
| 100 | 6 | 6 0 0 0 | 5 1 0 0 | 4 1 1 0 | 2 3 1 0 | 11 5 1 0# | |
-: none; ±: extremely slight; +: slight; ++: moderate. *p < 0.05, based on the Fisher's exact test, and significantly different from the corresponding group exposed to 0 mg/kg APAP; #p < 0.05, based on the Fisher's exact test, and significantly different from the corresponding group exposed to 0 mg/kg EGCG.
Figure 5(A) MDA, (B) SOD and (C) GSH levels in the liver of SD rats with/without EGCG pre-treatment after being injected APAP for 8 h. Values represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, based on student's t-test
Figure 6Activities of RCC (A) I and (B) III in liver mitochondria of SD rats with/without EGCG treatment after being injected APAP for 8 h. Values represent the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, based on student's t-test