Literature DB >> 34903814

Construction of a core collection of native Perilla germplasm collected from South Korea based on SSR markers and morphological characteristics.

Kyu Jin Sa1, Dong Min Kim1, Jun Seok Oh1,2, Hyeon Park1,2, Do Yoon Hyun3,4, Sookyeong Lee3, Ju Hee Rhee3, Ju Kyong Lee5,6.   

Abstract

The leaves and seed oil of Perilla crop (Perilla frutescens L.) have attracted interest as health foods in East Asia. This crop has been traditionally cultivated and used for a long time as a folk plant, especially in Korea. In our study, the 22 SSR markers and eight morphological traits were used to assess the genetic diversity and population structure, to select a core collection of 400 Perilla accessions conserved in the RDA-Genebank of South Korea. A total of 173 alleles were detected and the number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 to 15 (average = 7.9). Gene diversity and polymorphic information content ranged from 0.138 to 0.868 (average = 0.567) and 0.134 to 0.853 (average = 0.522), respectively. The 400 accessions were not clearly distinguished geographically by STRUCTURE and UPGMA analyses. A core collection (44 accessions) was selected from the entire collection by using PowerCore. The core collection accounted for 11.0% of the entire Perilla collection, including 100% of the number of alleles maintained in the whole collection and with similar or greater Shannon-Weaver and Nei diversity indices than the whole collection. The core collection selected by SSR markers was evenly distributed in three clusters on a scatter plot by eight morphological traits. The first core collection of Perilla accessions was constructed, and it maintained allelic richness. Further modification of the core collection is expected with the continuous addition of new accessions of the two cultivated types of Perilla crop and their weedy types.
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34903814      PMCID: PMC8668929          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-03362-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Plant genetic resources (PGRs) mean individuals or populations of wild species, genetic stocks, and cultivars, which are maintained as types of plants, seeds, and tissues[1]. These PGRs are utilized to provide new plant varieties with better resistance, adaptation, and nutritive qualities. Conservation and collection of PGRs is necessary to maintain higher genetic diversity for food security and use in the future[2]. Moreover, the conservation and collection of PGRs in most crops has been made possible by the establishment of genebanks in countries around the world. The fundamental role of a genebank is to increase genetic diversity and prevent genetic erosion by collecting, conserving, and documenting PGRs. In South Korea, the Genebank of the National Agrobiodiversity Center (NAAS) of the Rural Development Administration (RDA-Genebank) plays an important role in supporting genetic resource conservation and utilization. The RDA-Genebank currently preserves a total of 266,649 genetic resources for 3,083 species, including food, horticulture, industrial, and forage crops (http://genebank.rda.go.kr). Although a large number of PGRs have been collected in genebanks, the large sample size and lack of adequate information about population structure and genetic diversity of these collections hinders the successful utilization of the genetic potential for PGRs[3]. Efficient management and utilization of the existing collections could be greatly enhanced by reducing the number of accessions from large collections[4]. Frankel (1984) suggested the concept of a core collection, which is a subset of accessions with minimum redundancy and maximum genetic diversity from an entire collection. Various studies have proposed subsampling proportions ranging from 5 to 30% for a core collection[3,6-8]. A core collection is commonly established to conserve phenotypic and genetic diversity and enable the selection of candidate alleles associated with important agronomic traits[9]. Development of a core collections has been promoted as the most important activity in conservation and utilization of PGRs since 1996[2]. Therefore, core collections have already been reported for many crops, such as rice[10], soybean[11], and wheat[12]. The development of core collections was based at first on passport data, geographical distribution, and phenotypic data[13-15]. Subsequently, the advance of molecular markers, which are an efficient means of confirming genetic diversity, has allowed the development of more powerful core collections in many crop species, either alone[16] or in combination with phenotypic data[4,17]. Among various molecular markers, simple sequence repeats (SSRs) are often selected for genetic studies, such as for genetic diversity and the development of core collections, because of their advantages such as high reproducibility, polymorphism, abundance, and codominance[12,18,19]. Although there are a number of useful methods for selection of a core collection, the power core method for the development of a core collection utilizes the advanced M (maximization) strategy implemented through a modified heuristic algorithm by Kim et al. (2007). Using this program, core collections have been developed in various crops, such as rice[21], soybean[11], barnyard millet[22], ragi[23], and cassava[24]. Perilla crop (Perilla frutescens L., 2n = 40) is an annual self-fertilizing species of the Lamiaceae family. This species has been traditionally cultivated and used for a long time as a folk plant, especially in East Asian countries such as Korea, Japan, and China. It is divided into two different varieties (or cultivated types), P. frutescens var. frutescens and var. crispa, based on morphology and use in East Asia. For example, P. frutescens var. frutescens, which is called “dlggae” in Korea, “egoma” in Japan, and “ren” in China, is tall with a large seed size (more than 2 mm), green leaf and stem color, and non-wrinkled leaf and used as an oil and leafy vegetable crop[25,26]. In contrast, P. frutescens var. crispa, which is called “cha-jo-ki” in Korea, “shiso” in Japan, and “zisu” in China, is short with a small seed size (less than 2 mm), red or green leaves and stems, and wrinkly or non-wrinkly leaves and is used as a vegetable and herbal medicine crop[25,26]. P. frutescens var. frutescens has become a cash crop in South Korea. The leaves of var. frutescens are abundant in vitamin B and C, and it is a favored salad vegetable eaten with meat and used for pickles. Furthermore, Perilla seed oil of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens has a high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as linoleic acid (C18:2) and α-linolenic acid (C18:3), which comprise approximately 80% of Perilla seed oil. The Perilla seed oil, similarly to soybean, rapeseed, corn, and sesame seed oils, has been used for foods such as cooking oils[27,28]. Recently, the leaves and seed oil have attracted interest as health foods in South Korea; therefore, the cultivation area of P. frutescens var. frutescens has increased greatly. Although approximately thirty commercial varieties have been registered in Korea (http://www.seed.go.kr), there have been few efforts to develop new cultivars for Perilla crop. Most farmers still cultivate landraces of their own regions[29]. The RDA-Genebank in South Korea maintains 2,368 genetic resources of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla crop, which are available to researchers and farmers (http://www.genebank.go.kr/). To maximize the utilization of Perilla resources and for more efficient breeding programs, the morphological and genetic characteristics of the collected resources should be defined before use. Although many Perilla accessions in the RDA-Genebank have already been evaluated for phenotypic characteristics and diversity in the field, these characteristics are easily affected by environmental effects and evaluations are time and labor-intensive[30]. To overcome these limitations, molecular marker systems could be used to mitigate against the environmental effects and provide a better explanation of the variation than phenotype-based evaluation[31]. However, there has been a lack of information about genetic diversity and relationships at the molecular level for the RDA-Genebank accessions. Most of the Perilla accessions of the RDA-Genebank have been used rarely or not at all in Perilla crop breeding programs. Moreover, there are no reports of a core collection of Perilla based on DNA molecular markers. Therefore, in our study, we performed population structure and genetic diversity analyses of 400 accessions of the Perilla germplasm collection of the RDA-Genebank using 22 Perilla SSRs. This allowed us to 1) examine the level of genetic diversity and the population structure within accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens of the RDA-Genebank and 2) select a Perilla core collection that represents the entire collection without redundancy. This core group will provide useful information for efficient conservation and the utilization of genetic resources as well as for the selection of useful genetic resources for Perilla breeding programs.

Results

Genetic variation in the whole collection determined using SSR markers

A total of 22 SSR loci were used to evaluate the GDI, population structure, and genetic relationships among the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens (Table 1). In this study, the 22 SSR primer sets were selected in a preliminary study using about 120 SSR primer sets to identify polymorphic SSR primer sets. Finally, a total of 22 SSR loci were confirmed within 173 alleles in the 400 accessions. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 4 (KNUPF36, KNUPF37, KNUPF59, KNUPF74) to 15 (KNUPF89), and the average number of alleles per locus was 7.9 (Table 1). The average GD was 0.567, with a range from 0.138 (KNUPF59) to 0.868 (KNUPF10). The average PIC value was 0.522, with a range of 0.134 (KNUPF59) – 0.853 (KNUPF10). The average MAF was 0.566, with a range of 0.195 (KNUPF10) – 0.928 (KNUPF59) (Table 1).
Table 1

Characteristics of the 22 SSR loci including allele number and GDI among 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens.

SSR lociNo. of AlleleGDPICMAF
KNUPF160.3870.3670.773
KNUPF2100.6920.6400.425
KNUPF450.6760.6200.430
KNUPF570.6640.6060.450
KNUPF10140.8680.8530.195
KNUPF16100.7440.7070.385
KNUPF2350.3840.3320.755
KNUPF25120.5490.5050.630
KNUPF2650.3550.3070.778
KNUPF2890.4080.3740.750
KNUPF3640.6120.5440.523
KNUPF3740.4810.4140.665
KNUPF39110.7670.7360.380
KNUPF4370.4160.3730.738
KNUPF55100.6880.6480.480
KNUPF5940.1380.1340.928
KNUPF7140.5210.4090.528
KNUPF7440.3570.3280.788
KNUPF7780.5160.4220.590
KNUPF89150.8130.7950.355
KNUPF10760.6080.5760.590
KNUPF113130.8220.8030.318
Total173
Mean7.860.5670.5220.566

GD: gene diversity, PIC: polymorphic information content, MAF: major allele frequency.

Characteristics of the 22 SSR loci including allele number and GDI among 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens. GD: gene diversity, PIC: polymorphic information content, MAF: major allele frequency. To confirm the geographical difference for genetic diversity for accessions collected from central (Group I, 148 accessions) and southern (Group II, 211 accessions) regions of South Korea and foreign or unknown (Group III, 41 accessions), our study compared the number of alleles and the GDI of the three groups (Table 2). The average number of alleles was 6.5, 6.9, and 5.1 alleles for accessions of Group I, II, and III, respectively. In the results for GDI, the average GD values were 0.562, 0.554, and 0.578 for Group I, II, and III, respectively. The average PIC values were 0.521, 0.506, and 0.533 for Group I, II, and III, respectively. The average MAF values was 0.576, 0.571, and 0.541 for Group I, II, and III, respectively (Table 2). Among the 173 alleles, 23 private alleles (13.3%) were only detected in one of the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens. The percentage of rare alleles (frequency < 0.05) was 56.1% (97 alleles) among the 173 alleles, whereas intermediate-frequency alleles (frequency of 0.05–0.5) and abundant alleles (frequency > 0.5) represented 36.4% (63 alleles) and 7.5% (13 alleles), respectively, of the 173 alleles (Fig. 1).
Table 2

Comparison of genetic diversity index between accessions collected from different regions using 22 SSR markers.

SSR lociNo. of AlleleGDPICMAF
Group I(n = 148)Group II(n = 211)Group III(n = 41)Group I(n = 148)Group II(n = 211)Group III(n = 41)Group I(n = 148)Group II(n = 211)Group III(n = 41)Group I(n = 148)Group II(n = 211)Group III(n = 41)
KNUPF14650.4640.2660.5910.4320.2560.5440.7090.8530.585
KNUPF28940.7190.6670.6660.6710.6120.6160.3720.4500.488
KNUPF45550.7020.6280.7640.6520.5600.7250.4050.4740.293
KNUPF56660.6780.6450.6510.6250.5830.5960.4530.4740.488
KNUPF10121390.8460.8710.8570.8280.8580.8400.2300.2090.195
KNUPF1671060.7470.7460.7040.7120.7060.6590.3990.3650.439
KNUPF234530.4170.3600.3800.3550.3160.3240.7230.7770.756
KNUPF2510560.5360.5130.6720.4980.4710.6120.6490.6640.390
KNUPF265340.3900.3500.2220.3370.2950.2120.7500.7770.878
KNUPF287650.3730.3900.5390.3570.3490.4570.7840.7580.585
KNUPF364430.5610.6230.6080.5030.5480.5340.6010.4690.512
KNUPF374440.4420.4850.5650.3870.4020.5170.7090.6450.610
KNUPF398970.7640.7570.7420.7320.7240.7080.3780.3740.415
KNUPF434640.3150.4550.5010.2930.3970.4430.8180.6970.659
KNUPF559960.6520.6590.7720.6220.6010.7390.5470.4600.341
KNUPF594320.1650.1260.0930.1610.1220.0880.9120.9340.951
KNUPF713430.5000.5260.5040.3940.4150.4000.5880.5120.585
KNUPF743420.4140.3620.0480.3760.3300.0460.7430.7820.976
KNUPF775730.4950.5050.5090.4120.4120.4200.6350.6070.610
KNUPF891414110.8240.7990.8270.8060.7800.8080.3310.3790.317
KNUPF1076660.5490.6150.7210.5220.5800.6830.6490.5780.439
KNUPF113121380.8160.8270.7770.7940.8090.7520.2970.3180.390
Total144151112
Mean6.56.95.10.5620.5540.5780.5210.5060.5330.5760.5710.541

Group I: Central of South Korea, Group II: Southern of South Korea, Group III: Foreign countries or Unknown.

Figure 1

Histogram of allele frequencies in 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens based on 22 SSR markers.

Comparison of genetic diversity index between accessions collected from different regions using 22 SSR markers. Group I: Central of South Korea, Group II: Southern of South Korea, Group III: Foreign countries or Unknown. Histogram of allele frequencies in 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens based on 22 SSR markers.

Population structure and genetic relationships among 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens

To understand the population structure among the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens, our study used a model-based approach in STRUCTURE to divide the accessions into subgroups. We applied the ad hoc measure ΔK using the method developed by Evanno et al. (2005) to clearly determine the number of subgroups in interpreting the actual K values. The highest value of ∆K for the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens was found at K = 2 (Fig. 2). Although we confirmed K = 2 by the ∆K method, some accessions were admixed between these two groups. Thus, we divided the accessions into two main groups and an admixed group in accordance with the method of Wang et al. (2008) based on a threshold of 0.8 (Fig. 3). Based on K = 2, Group I included 70 accessions from the central region, 104 accessions from the southern region, and 18 accessions from foreign or unknown. Group II comprised 24 accessions from the central region, 45 accessions from the southern region, and 12 accessions from foreign or unknown. The admixed group included a total of 127 accessions, which consisted of 54 accessions from the central region, 62 accessions from the southern region, and 11 accessions from foreign or unknown.
Figure 2

Magnitude of ΔK as a function of K. The peak value of ΔK was at K = 2 in 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens of Perilla crop.

Figure 3

Population structure pattern for the highest ΔK value (K = 2) of 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens of Perilla crop.

Magnitude of ΔK as a function of K. The peak value of ΔK was at K = 2 in 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens of Perilla crop. Population structure pattern for the highest ΔK value (K = 2) of 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens of Perilla crop. To confirm the genetic relationships by distance-based analysis among the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens, a dendrogram was constructed using UPGMA. This showed that all Perilla accessions were clustered into ten major groups with a genetic similarity of 45.7% (Supplementary Fig. 2). Group IV (182,549, foreign), VI (215,256, central region), VIII (104,486, central region), IX (215,257, central region), and X (214,479, unknown) each included only one accession. Meanwhile, Group I contained 33 accessions (3 accessions from the central region and 30 accessions from the southern region). Group II consisted of 325 accessions (132 accessions from the central region, 167 accessions from the southern region, and 26 accessions from foreign or unknown). Group V and VII included four accessions (3 accessions from the central region and 1 accession from the southern region) and six accessions (1 accession from the central region, 2 accessions from the southern region, and 3 accessions from foreign or unknown), respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2). In addition, Group II, which contained 81.8% of the 400 accessions, was further subdivided into ten sub-clusters with a genetic similarity of 51.8% (Supplementary Fig. 2). The first sub-cluster contained 261 accessions, which divided again into eight sub-groups with a genetic similarity of 56.9% (95 accessions from the central region, 147 accessions from the southern regions, and 19 accessions from foreign or unknown). The second sub-cluster consisted of 13 accessions (10 accession from the central region and 3 accessions from the southern region). The third sub-cluster (2 central and 3 southern region) and fifth sub-cluster (4 central and 1 southern region) each contained five accessions. The fourth sub-cluster consisted of 12 accessions (7 accessions from the central region, 2 accessions from the southern region, and 3 accessions from foreign or unknown). The sixth sub-cluster contained 16 accessions (9 accessions from the central and 7 accessions from the southern region). The seventh sub-cluster (2 accessions from the southern region) and eighth sub-cluster (2 accessions, one collected from the central and one from the southern region) each consisted of two accessions. The ninth sub-cluster included eight accessions (3 accessions from the central region, 1 accession from the southern region, and 4 accessions from foreign or unknown). Finally, the tenth sub-cluster of Group II contained only one accession, collected from the central region (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Development and evaluation of the core collection

To establish a core collection, data of 22 SSR genotypes with a total of 173 alleles were used to construct a core set from the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens using PowerCore software[20]. For the core collection, 44 accessions were selected. The core collection contained 16 representatives from the central region, 21 from the southern region, and 7 foreign or unknown (Table 3). The core collection accounted for 11.0% of the whole Perilla collection, including 100% of the number of alleles maintained in the whole collection. To compare the allelic richness between the core and whole collections, our study confirmed the diversity by the Shannon–Weaver (Sh.W.) and Nei calculation (Fig. 4, Table 4). The distributions of the Sh.W. and Nei indices in the 22 SSR markers for the core and the whole collections represented a high similarity or those of the core collection were greater than those of the whole collection (Fig. 4, Table 4). The results of a Student’s t test using SPSS software showed that there was no significant difference in the average genetic diversity (Sh.W. and Nei indices) between the core collection and the whole collection (p = 0.102 for Sh.W. and 0.192 for Nei indices). This indicates that the core collection selected herein sufficiently represents allelic richness and genetic diversity of the entire accessions.
Table 3

IT number, collection sites, and qualitative traits of core accessions selected by Powercore software.

IT NoVillage, town or cityRegionQL1QL2QL3QL4QL5QL6QL7QL8
117,005Gyeonggi-doSuwon-si11133311
157,458Gyeonggi-doHwaseong-si35331531
157,474Gyeonggi-doPaju-si--------
185,618Gyeonggi-doYongin-si31315531
195,351Gyeonggi-doYeoncheon-gun51533331
209,212Gyeonggi-doGanghwa-gun13131331
117,178Gangwon-doChuncheon-si31313311
137,611Gangwon-doYangyang-gun53553571
137,612Gangwon-doYangyang-gun33333571
137,613Gangwon-doYangyang-gun33335571
157,406Gangwon-doHwacheon-gun33333332
157,419Gangwon-doPyeongchang-gun53531331
117,187Chungcheongbuk-doDaejeon-si33313511
180,973Chungcheongbuk-doYeongdong-gun53533592
214,467Chungcheongnam-doGongju-si11153531
214,493Chungcheongnam-doGongju-si55533531
113,569Gyeongsangbuk-doUiseong-gun51513531
117,023Gyeongsangbuk-doDaegu-si13133331
117,033Gyeongsangbuk-doChilgok-gun33311331
117,037Gyeongsangbuk-doChilgok-gun33311331
157,488Gyeongsangbuk-doGyeongju-si33333331
104,421Gyeongsangnam-doHamyang-gun--------
104,445Gyeongsangnam-doHamyang-gun31311331
104,886Gyeongsangnam-doHamyang-gun53531331
108,995Gyeongsangnam-doHadong-gun31311332
185,635Gyeongsangbuk-doMungyeong-si33335531
181,994Gyeongsangnam-doGeochang-gun33355532
196,835Gyeongsangnam-doHadong-gun33333571
104,232Jeollabuk-doSunchang-gun53513332
111,021Jeollabuk-doGochang-gun31333531
111,080Jeollabuk-doGochang-gun53513311
117,055Jeollabuk-doGwangju-si51511511
117,209Jeollabuk-doJinan-gun51511331
204,150Jeollabuk-doGochang-gun31313331
157,529Jeollanam-doGurye-gun33333352
185,654Jeollanam-doGokseong-gun31335331
117,188Jeju-doJeju-si33313551
182,549ForeignBhutan51537511
196,391ForeignChina75733511
200,354ForeignNepal31337571
201,758ForeignJapan31313571
210,184UnknownUnknown35313311
214,479UnknownUnknown31353531
214,489UnknownUnknown55513332
Figure 4

Comparison of a Shannon–Weaver diversity index (A) and Nei’s diversity index (B) using 22 SSR markers between the core collection and the whole collection.

Table 4

Comparison of diversity index between 44 core and entire accessions using 22 SSR markers.

SSR lociC-AlleleC-Sh.WC-NeiE-AlleleE-Sh.WE-Nei
KNUPF151.0030.55750.6440.390
KNUPF291.5670.7291.3590.692
KNUPF441.1450.72441.0720.684
KNUPF561.3690.68661.2010.664
KNUPF10132.2520.894131.9240.879
KNUPF1691.8520.81091.5210.745
KNUPF2340.8400.45740.6590.384
KNUPF25111.6230.716110.9980.550
KNUPF2640.7830.42740.590.355
KNUPF2881.3480.62380.8010.408
KNUPF3630.9980.62631.0070.612
KNUPF3730.9180.55130.7540.482
KNUPF39101.7530.815101.5090.772
KNUPF4361.0380.52760.6880.418
KNUPF5591.7570.76791.2950.692
KNUPF5930.4930.24530.2920.138
KNUPF7130.8470.54230.760.521
KNUPF7430.5890.45230.4820.362
KNUPF7771.1490.60270.8180.517
KNUPF89142.0560.823141.8970.815
KNUPF10751.2320.64251.1190.610
KNUPF113122.1090.851121.9180.821
Average6.91.3060.6396.91.0590.569

C- core collection group, E- entire group.

Sh.W. and Nei—Diversity index using Shannon & Weaver and Nei calculation by PowerCore software.

IT number, collection sites, and qualitative traits of core accessions selected by Powercore software. Comparison of a Shannon–Weaver diversity index (A) and Nei’s diversity index (B) using 22 SSR markers between the core collection and the whole collection. Comparison of diversity index between 44 core and entire accessions using 22 SSR markers. C- core collection group, E- entire group. Sh.W. and Nei—Diversity index using Shannon & Weaver and Nei calculation by PowerCore software.

Morphological variation and principal component analysis among 372 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens

The results of examining eight morphological traits of the 372 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens are summarized in Supplementary Table 3. In the survey of color of leaf surface (QL1), 59 accessions showed light green color, 207 showed green, and 104 showed deep green. The remaining 2 accessions showed light purple color. For color of reverse side leaf (QL2), 144 accessions showed light green color, 203 accessions showed green, and 24 showed deep green. One accession only showed light purple. For stem color (QL3), 58 accessions showed light green, 207 accessions showed green, and 105 accessions showed deep green. Only 2 accessions had light purple. For leaf shape (QL4), 161 accessions showed lanceolate shape, 146 accessions showed heart shape, and 65 accessions showed oblong shape. For degree of pubescence (QL5), 90 accessions showed slightly pubescent, 222 accessions showed normal pubescent, and 58 accessions showed heavily pubescent. The remaining 2 accessions showed more heavily pubescent. In the case of flowering time (QL6), 179 accessions showed intermediate flowering (flowering days from August 15 to September 5) and 193 accessions showed late flowering (flowering days from September 6 after September 25). In the case of the two seed characteristics, for seed color (QL7) of the 372 Perilla accessions, 86 accessions showed dark brown, 212 accessions showed brown, 24 accessions showed gray, 37 accessions showed white, the remaining 13 accessions showed mixed colors. For seed hardness (QL8) of the 372 Perilla accessions, 305 accessions showed soft seeds and the remaining 67 accessions showed hard seeds (Supplement Table 3). This study used this morphological data to perform PCA analysis. The analysis results showed that the first and second principal components accounted for 25.5% and 16.8%, respectively, of the total variance (Table 5). In this study, QL1 and QL3 contributed in the positive direction on the first axis, and QL5 and QL6 contributed in the positive direction on the second axis. Thus, the traits that contributed in the positive direction on the first or second axes are considered to be useful for discrimination between accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens (Table 5). Based on the first axis, most accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens were clearly separated into three groups on the positive and negative sides of the first axis by color of leaf surface and stem (Fig. 5). Thus, the traits (QL1, QL3, QL5, QL6) that contributed in the positive or negative direction on the first or second axis (Table 5) are considered to be useful for discrimination between accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens.
Table 5

Cumulative variance of first and second principal components and the loadings of eight qualitative characters on each principal component.

Morphological CharacterEigenvectors
12
QL5−0.2380.774
QL6−0.1940.654
QL7−0.113−0.204
QL2−0.002−0.321
QL40.0080.331
QL80.133−0.132
QL30.9760.155
QL10.9800.154
Cumulative variance (%)25.516.8
Figure 5

Projection of 372 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens in the first and second principal components.

Cumulative variance of first and second principal components and the loadings of eight qualitative characters on each principal component. Projection of 372 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens in the first and second principal components. In addition, to validate the core set selected by molecular markers, PCA analysis was used to confirm the distribution for the core collection selected by SSR markers. Two accessions (157,474 and 104,421) of the core collection could not be investigated for morphological characteristics (Table 3), but the remaining 42 accessions were evenly distributed in the three parts on a scatter plot by the PCA analysis (Fig. 5).

Discussion

Information about the genetic diversity of PGRs, which provide useful alleles associated with plant development and improvement, is very important for both the conservation and the utilization of germplasm that has been collected in a genebank[34,35]. With the development of molecular biology, DNA molecular marker technology provides useful information for the analysis of genetic diversity, genetic relationships, population structure, and core collections in the germplasm of many crop species[4,9,16,21-24]. In the case of Perilla crop, much analysis has been performed on genetic diversity, genetic relationships, and population structure using amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP)[29], random amplification of polymorphic DNAs (RAPD)[26,36], and SSR markers[37-40]. Unfortunately, and in contrast with other major crop species, other molecular marker technologies in Perilla species have not yet been developed. Among these marker systems, as already explained in the Introduction, SSR marker technology is highly polymorphic and reproducible, generally co-dominant and abundant in the plant genome, and it has provided useful information for the analysis of genetic diversity, genetic relationships, population structure, etc. in the germplasm of Perilla species[37,41-44]. Recently, SSR primer sets have been developed for Perilla crop by many researchers[37,43-46] and used successfully for the analysis of genetic diversity, genetic relationships, population structure, and association mapping among the accessions of cultivated and weedy types of Perilla crop[28,38-40,43,47,48]. Therefore, this study used SSR markers to identify genetic diversity and relationships, population structure, and a core collection of RDA-Genebank Perilla germplasm. The GD and PIC values determined in this study of 0.567 and 0.522, respectively (Table 1), were compared with those of previous studies of Ma et al. (2019) and Park et al. (2019) that contained more weedy Perilla accessions and showed values of 0.577 and 0.625 for GD and 0.537 and 0.582 for PIC with 21 and 25 SSR markers, respectively. These findings reveal a lower level of genetic diversity in the collection of this study, which mainly consisted of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens. Although wild species have not yet been found in Perilla crop, many accessions of the weedy type of Perilla crop have been reported in East Asia, particularly in South Korea and China, and they show higher genetic diversity than accessions of the cultivated type of Perilla crop[25,26,29,38-40,43,49,50]. Meanwhile, polymorphism of loci can be considered high, medium, or low with GDI > 0.5, GDI < 0.5 and > 0.25, or GDI < 0.25, respectively, according to a report by Vaiman et al. (1994). The population in the current study consisting of the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens has average GD and PIC values of over 0.5 in the 22 SSR markers, indicating that this population has a relatively high genetic diversity (Table 1). Moreover, the 14 (based on GD) and 12 (based on PIC) SSR markers among the entire SSR markers showed a high level of polymorphism based on GDI (each > 0.5) (Table 1). The SSR markers named KNUPF used in this study were recently developed by our previous studies for Perilla crop[43,44,46]. Although only cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens of Perilla crop, which has relatively lower diversity, was used as material in this study, many SSR markers showed relatively high GDI[29,38-40,49]. Therefore, these SSR markers were considered useful for identifying genetic diversity and population structure and for selecting a core collection for accessions of Perilla crop. Furthermore, these SSR markers will be very useful for genome-wide association study (GWAS) or quantitative traits loci (QTL) analysis, because these markers were developed by using the results of transcriptome analysis for Perilla crop[43-45,52]. In East Asia, although China is considered the origin of Perilla crop, South Korea is assumed to be the secondary center of biodiversity of Perilla crop because of extensive cultivation, various uses, and high morphological and genetic diversity as well as the existence of weedy types[25,26,49,50]. Recently, cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens of Perilla crop has become a cash crop in South Korea, and the cultivation area has expanded significantly. To maximize the use of genetic resources of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens of Perilla crop preserved in the RDA-Genebank, the genetic characteristics of the collected resources should be analyzed for efficient conservation and utilization in South Korea. Therefore, this study compared the average allele numbers and GDI values among the central (Group I, 148 accessions) and southern region (Group II, 211 accessions) accessions of South Korea and foreign or unknown (Group III, 41 accessions) accessions (Table 2). The highest allele number was revealed in Group II, followed by Group I and Group III, while the highest GDI values were confirmed in Group III, followed by Group I and Group II (Table 2). Although Group II had the highest allele number, genetic diversity for Group II was lower than that of Group I and II. This result suggests that Group II has the highest number of accessions with more Group II-specific alleles, while this group consists of more accessions with similar genetic characteristics than the other two groups. Moreover, when comparing the South Korea (Group I and II) and foreign accessions (Group III), the South Korea accessions show lower genetic diversity than the foreign accessions (Table 2). This result indicates that the cultivated type of var. frutescens of South Korea has a narrower genetic diversity than the foreign accessions, even though South Korea is the secondary center of Perilla crop. It may be that the environmental variation in the central and southern regions of South Korea is not severe and that farmers for Perilla crop want uniform properties for cultivated type of var. frutescens, such as green leaves and seeds with higher oil yield. However, in South Korea, many accessions of weedy type of var. frutescens with high genetic and phenotypic diversity were found throughout the region[25,29,38,43,49]. Although numerous PGRs are currently conserved in genebanks around the world, the large amount of PGRs makes their accessibility and application difficult[3,8]. Moreover, management of these PGRs requires significant effort and expense. It is essential to select and manage a core collection, which can represent the entire collection. The evaluation of genetic distance or population structure among genotypes helps in the selection of parental combinations for generating new segregating populations, which preserves genetic diversity in breeding programs[53]. The identification of the genetic relationships and population structures of an entire collection may provide useful information for core collection selection and the management of PGRs. In this study, to understand the genetic relationships and population structure of 400 accessions of cultivated type of var. frutescens from central and southern regions of South Korea, we used two different methods: a model-based approach with STRUCTURE and a distance-based approach with a UPGMA dendrogram (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2). The STRUCTURE results revealed that the 400 accessions of cultivated var. frutescens could be divided into two major groups and an admixed group at K = 2 (Figs. 3, 4), while the UPGMA dendrogram results showed that the 400 accessions of cultivated var. frutescens were divided into ten major groups with 45.7% of genetic similarity. As mentioned above in the Results section, there was no clear geographical classification by STRUCTURE and UPGMA analysis among the 400 accessions of cultivated var. frutescens from the central and southern regions of South Korea and foreign regions (Fig. 3, Supplementary Figs. 1, 2). Xie et al. (2008)[54] mentioned that population structure and genetic relationship patterns of many accessions are affected by many factors, such as gene flow, selection by environment or human, and breeding systems. Perilla crop has a long history of cultivation in East Asia including in South Korea. In South Korea, because many native landraces of Perilla crop are still widespread, these seeds might be frequently exchanged between diverse regions by farmers or animals and birds, as previously reported by Lee et al. (2002)[29]. Meanwhile, because of failure to select a core set by model and distance-based methods, this study utilized PowerCore to construct a core collection with maximum genetic diversity from the entire initial collection and with a minimal number of germplasm resources. In particular, this study used molecular data rather than phenotypic data to construct the core collection. This is because molecular data using molecular markers is more accurate for ensuring genetic diversity of the initial collection and preventing missing data or environmental interactions that typically exist in phenotypic data[55]. PowerCore in this study captured 100% of the alleles with a sampling percentage of 11%, based on 22 SSR markers throughout the collection (Table 4). The percentage of selected samples identified in this study was similar to the percentage (~ 10%) proposed by Brown (1989)[56], while lower than the suggested percentage (20 ~ 30%) by Yonezawa et al. (1995)[7]. Sh.W. and Nei diversity indices were used for validation of the core collection, and the averages of the Sh.W. index (1.306) and Nei index (0.639) of the Perilla core collection were higher than those of the entire initial collection (Sh.W. = 1.059, Nei = 0.569), indicating increased genetic diversity of the core collection. This may be because of the removal of genetic redundancy in the core collection compared with the entire initial collection. It is obvious that this core collection is an exact representation of the diversity of the entire collection (Fig. 4, Table. 4). Although some accessions were absent and only a small number of traits were investigated in the PCA analysis, the accessions of the core collection selected by SSR markers were well reflected in three clusters based on the first axis of the PCA scatter plot by eight morphological traits (Fig. 5). In detail, the morphological analysis revealed all types of color of leaf surface (QL1) and stem color (QL3) in the core collection. Although no accession with light purple for color of reverse side leaf (QL2) was included in the core collection, the remaining three types were contained in the core collection (Supplementary Tables 2, 3). All three types of leaf shape (QL4) were included amongst the 42 accessions in the core collection. Moreover, all four types of degree of pubescence (QL5) were included in the 42 accessions of the core collection. In the case of flowering time (QL6), there were no accessions for early flowering type in the morphological evaluation of the 42 accessions, but the intermediate and late flowering types were contained in the core collection. All five types of seed color (QL7) were included in the 42 accessions of core collection. In addition, most of the 42 accessions in core collection had soft seeds, while seven accessions showed hard seeds (Table 3). This study constructed the first core collection of Korean Perilla accessions and maintained allelic richness. It can be considered as germplasm for identifying useful genes for important agricultural traits. Further modification of the core collection is expected by the continuous addition of new Perilla accessions, such as accessions of the two cultivated types of Perilla crop and their weedy types. Further analysis of phenotypic and agronomic traits for the core collection is necessary to provide more valuable information for the development and utilization of Perilla accessions in breeding programs.

Materials and methods

Plant materials and DNA extraction

A total of 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens collected in South Korea and other regions (foreign or unknown accessions) were obtained from the RDA-Genebank of the Republic of Korea (http://genebank.rda.go.kr). The accessions of Perilla germplasm preserved by the RDA-Genebank of the Republic of Korea have been collected for decades with the approval of farmers for the Korean native Perilla accessions. The IT number and location information for these materials is shown in Supplementary Table 1. South Korea is geographically divided into central and southern regions (Supplementary Fig. 1). The central region includes Gangwon-do, Gyeonggi-do, and Chungcheong-do; while the southern region includes Gyeongsang-do, Jeolla-do, and Jeju-do. A total of 359 accessions were collected from the central and southern regions of South Korea, whereas the remaining 41 accessions were either collected from foreign countries (20 accessions) or the collection region is unknown (21 accessions) (Supplementary Table 1). In the central region, 148 accessions were collected from Gangwon-do (46 accessions), Gyeonggi-do (53 accessions), and Chungcheong-do (49 accessions); while in the southern region, 211 accessions were collected from Gyeongsang-do (125 accessions), Jeolla-do (85 accessions), and Jeju-do (1 accession). The accessions used in this study were selected from the RDA-Genebank as breeding materials for the development of leaf vegetable cultivars of cultivated var. frutescens. Total DNA was extracted from the young leaf tissue of individual representative plants of each accession according to Plant DNAzol Reagent protocols (GibcoBRL Inc., Grand Island, NY, USA). Our studies were complied with local and national regulations and following Kangwon National University (Chuncheon, Korea) and National Agrobiodiversity Center, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA (Jeonju, Korea) regulations.

Evaluation of morphological characteristics

For evaluation of morphological variation among the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens, 20 seeds of each accession were sown in a nursery bed in early May 2020, and kept in a glass house for a month. After that, seven seedlings of each accession were then transplanted to the fields of the experimental farm of Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do in early June 2020. We examined eight morphological characteristics related to leaf and seed quality and quantity, namely color of leaf surface (QL1), color of reverse side leaf (QL2), stem color (QL3), leaf shape (QL4), degree of pubescence (QL5), flowering time (QL6), seed color (QL7), and seed hardness (QL8) at the appropriate growth stages. These morphological traits, as shown in Supplementary Table 2, were selected based on a previous report by Lee and Ohnishi (2001). In our study, 28 accessions were not used for measurement because of failure of plant growth in the field. Therefore, in this study, only 372 accessions out of the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens were evaluated for morphological characteristics (Supplementary Table 1).

SSR analysis and DNA electrophoresis

SSR amplification was performed in a total volume of 20 μL containing 20 ng genomic DNA, 1 × polymerase chain reaction (PCR) buffer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers, and 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA). The PCR profile consisted of initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 36 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min 30 s, with a final extension step of 5 min at 72 °C. After PCR, DNA electrophoresis analysis was performed with a QIAxcel advanced system (QIAGEN Co., Hilden, Germany) according to the protocol described in the QIAxcel DNA Handbook. The samples were run in the QIAxcel advanced electrophoresis system, and sample separation was performed over 15 min. Gel images were obtained as the results, and the quantification analysis was performed with QIAxcel software. The results were displayed as gel images and electropherograms acquired from the QIAxcel advanced system software.

Data analysis

The fragments amplified for each SSR primer set were scored as present (1) or absent (0). Power Marker version 3.25[57] was used to confirm information on the number of alleles, allele frequency, and genetic diversity index (GDI), such as major allele frequency (MAF), gene diversity (GD), and polymorphic information content (PIC). Genetic similarities (GS) were calculated for each pair of accessions using the Dice similarity index[58]. To illustrate the genetic relationships of the total accessions, a similarity matrix was used to construct an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) dendrogram by the application of SAHN-Clustering from NTSYS-pc V2.1[59]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to detect differences between and within accessions of P. frutescens var. frutescens. The PCA analysis was performed using NTSYS-pc V2.1[59]. Population structure was investigated for the 400 accessions of cultivated P. frutescens var. frutescens using STRUCTURE 2.2 software[60]. Five independent runs with K values ranging from one to ten were performed with 100,000 cycles for both burn-in and the run length. The delta K statistic, based on the rate of change in the log probability of data between K values[32], was calculated with STRUCTURE HARVESTER. For extraction of a core collection, this study used PowerCore software, which uses the advanced M strategy implemented through the modified heuristic algorithm for the core collection as described in the user’s manual[20]. Supplementary Information.
  21 in total

1.  PowerMarker: an integrated analysis environment for genetic marker analysis.

Authors:  Kejun Liu; Spencer V Muse
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study.

Authors:  G Evanno; S Regnaut; J Goudet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  PowerCore: a program applying the advanced M strategy with a heuristic search for establishing core sets.

Authors:  Kyu-Won Kim; Hun-Ki Chung; Gyu-Taek Cho; Kyung-Ho Ma; Dorothy Chandrabalan; Jae-Gyun Gwag; Tae-San Kim; Eun-Gi Cho; Yong-Jin Park
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Population structure and linkage disequilibrium of a mini core set of maize inbred lines in China.

Authors:  Ronghuan Wang; Yongtao Yu; Jiuran Zhao; Yunsu Shi; Yanchun Song; Tianyu Wang; Yu Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Genetic diversity and population structure among accessions of Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton in East Asia using new developed microsatellite markers.

Authors:  Kyu Jin Sa; Ik-Young Choi; Kyong-Cheul Park; Ju Kyong Lee
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 1.839

6.  Identifying SSR markers associated with seed characteristics in Perilla (Perilla frutescens L.).

Authors:  Ye Ju Ha; Kyu Jin Sa; Ju Kyong Lee
Journal:  Physiol Mol Biol Plants       Date:  2021-01-25

7.  Population structure and linkage disequilibrium unravelled in tetraploid potato.

Authors:  Björn B D'hoop; M João Paulo; Krissana Kowitwanich; Mariëlle Sengers; Richard G F Visser; Herman J van Eck; Fred A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 5.699

8.  Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of rice germplasm from north-eastern region of India and development of a core germplasm set.

Authors:  Debjani Roy Choudhury; Nivedita Singh; Amit Kumar Singh; Sundeep Kumar; Kalyani Srinivasan; R K Tyagi; Altaf Ahmad; N K Singh; Rakesh Singh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evaluation of Genetic Diversity and Development of a Core Collection of Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) Populations in China.

Authors:  Wen Liu; Muhammad Qasim Shahid; Lin Bai; Zhenzhen Lu; Yuhong Chen; Lan Jiang; Mengyang Diao; Xiangdong Liu; Yonggen Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Identifying SSR Markers Related to Seed Fatty Acid Content in Perilla Crop (Perilla frutescens L.).

Authors:  Hyeon Park; Kyu Jin Sa; Do Yoon Hyun; Sookyeong Lee; Ju Kyong Lee
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-07-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Genetic variation of seed oil characteristics in native Korean germplasm of Perilla crop (Perilla frutescens L.) using SSR markers.

Authors:  Hyeon Park; Kyu Jin Sa; Sookyeong Lee; Ju Kyong Lee
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 2.164

2.  Genome-Wide Association Study for Agro-Morphological Traits in Eggplant Core Collection.

Authors:  Nayoung Ro; Mesfin Haile; Bitsam Kim; Gyu-Taek Cho; Jungro Lee; Yoon-Jung Lee; Do Yoon Hyun
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.