Literature DB >> 34903313

Behavioral and Physiologic Effects of Dirty Bedding Exposure in Female ICR Mice.

Anne L Merley1, Jennifer S Hubbard1, Aaron K Rendahl2, Felicia D Duke Boynton3, Lynn Collura Impelluso1,2.   

Abstract

Exposure of sentinel mice to dirty bedding is commonly used in health monitoring programs to screen colonies for clinical and subclinical disease. Despite the potential stressors present in dirty bedding, including but not limited to microorganisms, pheromones, and ammonia, it is unknown whether sentinel mice exposed to soiled bedding experience stress. In this study, select behavioral and physiologic changes associated with stress were assessed in female ICR mice exposed to dirty bedding. Behavioral parameters included evaluation in the home cage and selected behavioral tests; physiologic measurements included neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and weight. Mice in the acute group were exposed for 24 h whereas mice in the chronic group were exposed for 4 wk. Mice in the chronic group exposed to dirty bedding weighed less at days 21 and 28 than did control mice. Chronic mice exposed to dirty bedding also exhibited decreased net weight gain over the entire study period as compared with control mice. No significant differences were detected in the other behavioral and physiologic parameters measured. These results indicate that dirty bedding exposure may affect sentinel mice, but further investigation is needed to determine the specific mechanism(s) behind the weight difference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34903313      PMCID: PMC8786380          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.706


  85 in total

1.  Processing and treatment of corncob bedding affects cage-change frequency for C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Daniel A Domer; Rebecca L Erickson; Joann M Petty; Valerie K Bergdall; Judy M Hickman-Davis
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Rodent quality assurance testing: use of sentinel animal systems.

Authors:  Neil S Lipman; Felix R Homberger
Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 12.625

3.  What is stressful for females? Differential effects of unpredictable environmental or social stress in CD1 female mice.

Authors:  Harold Dadomo; Laura Gioiosa; Jenny Cigalotti; Graziano Ceresini; Stefano Parmigiani; Paola Palanza
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 3.587

Review 4.  Interpreting stress responses during routine toxicity studies: a review of the biology, impact, and assessment.

Authors:  Nancy E Everds; Paul W Snyder; Keith L Bailey; Brad Bolon; Dianne M Creasy; George L Foley; Thomas J Rosol; Teresa Sellers
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 5.  The Dichotomous Effect of Chronic Stress on Obesity.

Authors:  Maria Razzoli; Alessandro Bartolomucci
Journal:  Trends Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 12.015

6.  The time-to-integrate-to-nest test as an indicator of wellbeing in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Meagan L Rock; Alicia Z Karas; Katherine B Gartrell Rodriguez; Miranda S Gallo; Kathleen Pritchett-Corning; Richard H Karas; Mark Aronovitz; Brianna N Gaskill
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Demonstration and analysis of an alarm pheromone in mice.

Authors:  S J Rottman; C T Snowdon
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1972-12

Review 8.  Understanding the broad influence of sex hormones and sex differences in the brain.

Authors:  Bruce S McEwen; Teresa A Milner
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 9.  Animal models of anxiety and depression: how are females different?

Authors:  P Palanza
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The effects of early life adversity on growth, maturation, and steroid hormones in male and female rats.

Authors:  Samantha R Eck; Cory S Ardekani; Madeleine Salvatore; Sandra Luz; Eric D Kim; Charleanne M Rogers; Arron Hall; Demetrius E Lee; Sydney T Famularo; Seema Bhatnagar; Debra A Bangasser
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.