| Literature DB >> 34903262 |
Yue Qiu1, Xian-Jun Xue1,2, Geng Liu1,3, Miao-Miao Shen1,4, Chun-Yan Chao1,5, Jie Zhang1, Ya-Qi Guo1, Qian-Qian Niu1, Ya-Nan Yu1, Yu-Ting Song1, Huan-Huan Wang1, Shuang-Xi Wang1, Yu-Jing Chen1, Lin-Hua Jiang6,7, Peng Li8, Ya-Ling Yin9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular cognitive dysfunction in patients with vascular dementia (VD) is a kind of severe cognitive dysfunction syndrome caused by cerebrovascular diseases. At present, effective drugs to improve the cognitive function of VD patients still need to be explored. Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 2 (TRPM2) channel is a nonspecific cation channel that plays a key role in the toxic death of neurons. Perillaldehyde (PAE) has the protective effect of epilepsy and insomnia and other central nervous system diseases. The aim of this study is to explore whether PAE improves cognitive function in VD rats and to investigate the potential mechanisms in vivo and vitro.Entities:
Keywords: NMDAR pathway; Perillaldehyde; TRPM2; Vascular dementia
Year: 2021 PMID: 34903262 PMCID: PMC8670250 DOI: 10.1186/s13020-021-00545-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chin Med ISSN: 1749-8546 Impact factor: 5.455
Fig. 1Effects of PAE on spatial learning and memory. A The trajectory of rats in each group reaching the platform in the swimming pool. B Animals of PAE-treated group significantly increased Swim distance in quadrant, Swim distance in quadrant/Swim distance, Swim time in quadrant, Swim time in quadrant/Swim time, Number of escape than other groups (a, d, e, g, k). Animals of PAE-treated group significantly reduced Swim distance out quadrant, Swim distance out quadrant than other groups (b, f). PAE did not affect the locomotor ability of animals and all animals showed swimming abilities during habituation (c, h, i, j). Data are reported as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group. All results were analysed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Student’s t-test
Fig. 2PAE organizes the structure of hippocampus in rats. A Morphological analysis was performed under ultrastructure by electron microscope (×400). B Morphological analysis was performed under light microscope by hematoxylin and eosin staining (×400). C The quantitative analysis of nuclear structure (C, a–d) and mitochondrial structure (C, e–h) in hippocampal CA3 region. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group. All results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Student’s t-test
Fig. 3PAE rescues the degeneration of pyramidal neurons in the hippocampus of the VD rats. A Golgi-stained neuronal profiles of hippocampus in rats. B Trends of changes of spine density and C dendritic length in Golgi-stained hippocampus based on Neurolucida-based morphometry. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group. All results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Student’s t-test
Fig. 4The antioxidant effect of PAE in VD rats. At the end of experiments, rats were killed under anesthesia. Blood was collected to assay serum levels of A MDA content by the TBA method, B NO production by the Griess method, C ROS content by the NBT method, D SOD activity by the spectrophotometric method. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group. All results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA followed by Newman–Student’s t-test
Fig. 5PAE inhibited the apoptosis of hippocampal neurons in VD rats. A Representative photos of TUNEL staining in each group (×400). B Quantitative analysis of the normal neuron and C apoptotic cells. D Quantitation of damaged neurons after PAE treatment by MTT assay. Neuronal viability was significantly increased after PAE treatment. E Representative image of Immunofluorescence staining for Neu N (red) in the hippocampus from different groups. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group
Fig. 6PAE upregulated the protein expression of NR2B and downregulated the protein expression of TRPM2. A Fluo-3/AM was used to measure the cytosolic calcium concentration in hippocampal neurons (×800). B Immunofluorescence detection of NR2B and TRPM2 in hippocampal neurons (×200). C Quantitation of cytoplasmic Ca2+ fluorescence. D Quantitation of TRPM2 fluorescence expression intensity. E Quantitation of NR2B fluorescence expression intensity. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM. N is 6 in each group. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group
Fig. 7Expression levels of NR2B and TRPM2 in the hippocampus tissue. A Immunohistochemistry of NR2B and TRPM2 in the hippocampus tissue (×200). B, C Representative Western blotting of NR2B and TRPM2 in the hippocampus tissue. β-Actin was used as the loading control. D, E Corresponding histograms. All data is expressed as mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. *P < 0.05 vs. Model group