Sarah A Goegan1,2, Gary M Hasey3,4,5, Jelena P King1,2,3, Bruno J Losier3,6, Peter J Bieling2,3,5, Margaret C McKinnon1,3,5,7, Heather E McNeely1,2,3. 1. Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 2. Clinical Neuropsychology Service, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton (SJHH), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, 3710McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 4. ECT Clinic, St, Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 5. Mood Disorders Program, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton (SJHH), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 6. Forensic Psychiatry Program, St. 228603Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton (SJHH), Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. 7. 585565Homewood Research Institute, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of ECT under naturalistic conditions has not been well-studied. The current study aimed to 1) characterize a naturalistic sample of ECT patients; and 2) examine the long-term outcomes of ECT on depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II; BDI-II) and functional disability symptoms (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) in this sample. METHODS: Participants were adults who received ECT for a major depressive episode at an ambulatory ECT clinic between September 2010 and November 2020. Clinical and cognitive assessments were completed at baseline (n = 100), mid-ECT (n = 94), 2-4 weeks post-ECT (n = 64), 6-months post-ECT (n = 34), and 12-months post-ECT (n = 19). RESULTS: At baseline, participants had severe levels of depressive symptoms (BDI-II: M = 41.0, SD = 9.4), and 62.9% screened positive for multiple psychiatric diagnoses on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Depressive symptoms (F(4,49.1) = 49.92, P < 0.001) and disability symptoms (F(3,40.72) = 12.30, P < 0.001) improved significantly following ECT, and this was maintained at 12-months follow-up. Improvement in depressive symptoms trended towards significantly predicting reduction in disability symptoms from baseline to post-ECT, (F(1,56) = 3.67, P = 0.061). Although our clinical remission rate of 27% (BDI-II score ≤ 13 and ≥ 50% improvement) and overall response rate of 41.3% (≥50% improvement in BDI-II score) were lower than the rates reported in the extant RCT and community ECT literature, 36% of those treated with ECT were lost to follow-up and did not complete post-ECT rating scales. At baseline, remitters had significantly fewer psychiatric comorbidities, lower BDI-II scores, and lower disability symptoms than non-responders (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants were severely symptomatic and clinically complex. ECT was effective at reducing depressive symptoms and functional disability in this heterogeneous sample. Although a large amount of missing data may have distorted our calculated response/remission rates, it is also likely that clinical heterogeneity and severity contribute to lower-than-expected remission and response rates to ECT.
OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of ECT under naturalistic conditions has not been well-studied. The current study aimed to 1) characterize a naturalistic sample of ECT patients; and 2) examine the long-term outcomes of ECT on depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II; BDI-II) and functional disability symptoms (WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0) in this sample. METHODS: Participants were adults who received ECT for a major depressive episode at an ambulatory ECT clinic between September 2010 and November 2020. Clinical and cognitive assessments were completed at baseline (n = 100), mid-ECT (n = 94), 2-4 weeks post-ECT (n = 64), 6-months post-ECT (n = 34), and 12-months post-ECT (n = 19). RESULTS: At baseline, participants had severe levels of depressive symptoms (BDI-II: M = 41.0, SD = 9.4), and 62.9% screened positive for multiple psychiatric diagnoses on the MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Depressive symptoms (F(4,49.1) = 49.92, P < 0.001) and disability symptoms (F(3,40.72) = 12.30, P < 0.001) improved significantly following ECT, and this was maintained at 12-months follow-up. Improvement in depressive symptoms trended towards significantly predicting reduction in disability symptoms from baseline to post-ECT, (F(1,56) = 3.67, P = 0.061). Although our clinical remission rate of 27% (BDI-II score ≤ 13 and ≥ 50% improvement) and overall response rate of 41.3% (≥50% improvement in BDI-II score) were lower than the rates reported in the extant RCT and community ECT literature, 36% of those treated with ECT were lost to follow-up and did not complete post-ECT rating scales. At baseline, remitters had significantly fewer psychiatric comorbidities, lower BDI-II scores, and lower disability symptoms than non-responders (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Participants were severely symptomatic and clinically complex. ECT was effective at reducing depressive symptoms and functional disability in this heterogeneous sample. Although a large amount of missing data may have distorted our calculated response/remission rates, it is also likely that clinical heterogeneity and severity contribute to lower-than-expected remission and response rates to ECT.
Entities:
Keywords:
ECT; effectiveness; functional disability; major depression; naturalistic study
Authors: J J Dunkin; A F Leuchter; I A Cook; J E Kasl-Godley; M Abrams; S Rosenberg-Thompson Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2000-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 1998 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Charles B Nemeroff; Christine M Heim; Michael E Thase; Daniel N Klein; A John Rush; Alan F Schatzberg; Philip T Ninan; James P McCullough; Paul M Weiss; David L Dunner; Barbara O Rothbaum; Susan Kornstein; Gabor Keitner; Martin B Keller Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: K Popiolek; S Bejerot; O Brus; Å Hammar; M Landén; J Lundberg; P Nordanskog; A Nordenskjöld Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2019-09 Impact factor: 6.392