Literature DB >> 34902547

The role of neural flexibility in cognitive aging.

Eleanna Varangis1, Weiwei Qi2, Yaakov Stern3, Seonjoo Lee4.   

Abstract

Studies assessing relationships between neural and cognitive changes in healthy aging have shown that a variety of aspects of brain structure and function explain a significant portion of the variability in cognitive outcomes throughout adulthood. Many studies assessing relationships between brain function and cognition have utilized time-averaged, or static functional connectivity methods to explore ways in which brain network organization may contribute to aspects of cognitive aging. However, recent studies in this field have suggested that time-varying, or dynamic measures of functional connectivity, which assess changes in functional connectivity over the course of a scan session, may play a stronger role in explaining cognitive outcomes in healthy young adults. Further, both static and dynamic functional connectivity studies suggest that there may be differences in patterns of brain-cognition relationships as a function of whether or not the participant is performing a task during the scan. Thus, the goals of the present study were threefold: (1) assess whether neural flexibility during both resting as well as task-based scans is related to participant age and cognitive performance in a lifespan aging sample, (2) determine whether neural flexibility moderates relationships between age and cognitive performance, and (3) explore differences in neural flexibility between rest and task. Participants in the study were 386 healthy adults between the ages of 20-80 who provided resting state and/or task-based (Matrix Reasoning) functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan data as part of their participation in two ongoing studies of cognitive aging. Neural flexibility measures from both resting and task-based scans reflected the number of times each node changed network assignment, and were averaged both across the whole brain (global neural flexibility) as well as within ten somatosensory/cognitive networks. Results showed that neural flexibility was not related to participant age, and that task-based global neural flexibility, as well as task-based neural flexibility in several networks, tended to be negatively related to reaction times during the Matrix Reasoning task, however these effects did not survive strict multiple comparisons correction. Resting state neural flexibility was not significantly related to either participant age or cognitive performance. Additionally, no neural flexibility measures significantly moderated relationships between participant age and cognitive outcomes. Further, neural flexibility differed as a function of scan type, with resting state neural flexibility being significantly greater than task-based neural flexibility. Thus, neural flexibility measures computed during a cognitive task may be more meaningfully related to cognitive performance across the adult lifespan then resting state measures of neural flexibility.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive aging; Dynamic connectivity; Fluid Reasoning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34902547      PMCID: PMC9055953          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   7.400


  45 in total

1.  Community structure in time-dependent, multiscale, and multiplex networks.

Authors:  Peter J Mucha; Thomas Richardson; Kevin Macon; Mason A Porter; Jukka-Pekka Onnela
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations.

Authors:  Mikail Rubinov; Olaf Sporns
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Using connectome-based predictive modeling to predict individual behavior from brain connectivity.

Authors:  Xilin Shen; Emily S Finn; Dustin Scheinost; Monica D Rosenberg; Marvin M Chun; Xenophon Papademetris; R Todd Constable
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 13.491

4.  Evaluating storage, retention, and retrieval in disordered memory and learning.

Authors:  H Buschke; P A Fuld
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Decreased Dynamic Segregation but Increased Dynamic Integration of the Resting-state Functional Networks During Normal Aging.

Authors:  Li He; Xiaoqin Wang; Kaixiang Zhuang; Jiang Qiu
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  The Reference Ability Neural Network Study: motivation, design, and initial feasibility analyses.

Authors:  Yaakov Stern; Christian Habeck; Jason Steffener; Daniel Barulli; Yunglin Gazes; Qolamreza Razlighi; Danielle Shaked; Timothy Salthouse
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Distinct Global Brain Dynamics and Spatiotemporal Organization of the Salience Network.

Authors:  Tianwen Chen; Weidong Cai; Srikanth Ryali; Kaustubh Supekar; Vinod Menon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  The diverse club.

Authors:  M A Bertolero; B T T Yeo; M D'Esposito
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Cognitive and behavioural flexibility: neural mechanisms and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  A task-invariant cognitive reserve network.

Authors:  Yaakov Stern; Yunglin Gazes; Qolomreza Razlighi; Jason Steffener; Christian Habeck
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.