| Literature DB >> 34902084 |
Juliana M Ferreira1, Salorrane M N Pinto1, Filippe E F Soares2.
Abstract
Nutritional factors exert significant influence on the growth of entomopathogenic fungi, one of the main agents employed commercially in the biological control of arthropods. Thus, the objective of this work is to optimize the culture medium and solid fermentation time for production of proteases and conidia of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 and to evaluate the interference of riboflavin and salts on virulence and resistance to abiotic stress factors. In the first step, nine groups were separated: negative control, positive control, and seven supplementation groups: ammonium nitrate, ammonium chloride, potassium nitrate, sodium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium phosphate, urea. Sodium nitrate showed significant difference in protease production at the time of 20 days of solid fermentation. Then, different concentrations of sodium nitrate and riboflavin as supplement were evaluated. Response surface methodology demonstrated that riboflavin and sodium nitrate influence proteolytic activity and conidia production, but without synergism. Supplementation of the medium with the optimal concentration of sodium nitrate and riboflavin did not interfere with the germination of conidia without exposure to abiotic stress, but did increase the thermotolerance of conidia. The presence of riboflavin and sodium nitrate at optimal concentrations in the culture medium did not alter fungal virulence with and without exposure to heat stress, varying according to the presence or absence of the supernatant during exposure, evidencing that resistance to heat exposure is multifactorial and dependent on intra- and extracellular factors. Moreover, the supplementation increased the larvicidal activity of the supernatant against Aedes aegypti.Entities:
Keywords: Biological control; Entomopathogenic fungi; Enzymes; Optimization; Riboflavin
Year: 2021 PMID: 34902084 PMCID: PMC8669065 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-021-01326-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Highest and lowest levels (−1 a + 1) for the two variables: riboflavin (A) and sodium nitrate (B) used according to the experimental desing for Response Surface Methodology for optimization of protease and conidia production of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575
| Variables | Variable Code | Lowest level (−1) | Higher level (+1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Riboflavin % (g/g) | A | 0.001 | 0.199 |
| NaNO3% (g/g) | B | 0.006 | 0.373 |
Average conidial production of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 in biphasic fermentation on basal medium supplemented with inorganic salts
| Treatment | Conidial production (108 conidia/mL) | Conidial production (108 conidia/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Ammonium nitrate | 7.10 ± 2.7 | 7.40 ± 3.8 |
| Ammonium chloride | 6.35 ± 3.0 | 13.00 ± 12.0 |
| Potassium nitrate | 0.84 ± 0.2 | 2.61 ± 0.1 |
| Sodium nitrate | 3.59 ± 1.4 | 3.74 ± 3.2 |
| Ammonium sulfate | 4.85 ± 2.5 | 7.79 ± 6.6 |
| Phosphorus nitrate | 6.10 ± 4.9 | 9.83 ± 8.4 |
| Urea | 0.71 ± 0.4 | 1.92 ± 1.5 |
| Negative control | 1.44 ± 1.3 | 2.58 ± 1.3 |
| Positive control | 4.72 ± 1.1 | 5.05 ± 4.2 |
Conidia were collected after solid fermentation in parboiled rice for 10 or 20 days. Scale 1 × 108 conidia/ mL
Protease activity of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 produced in medium supplemented with different inorganic salts and solid fermentation time
| Treatment | Protease activity (U/mL) | Protease activity (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|
| Ammonium nitrate | 10.7 ± 7.1ac | 8.21 ± 4.4ab |
| Ammonium chloride | 9.70 ± 4.0a | 6.14 ± 0.8a |
| Potassium nitrate | 19.7 ± 0.2ac | 3.32 ± 0.3a* |
| Sodium nitrate | 12.1 ± 0.1bc | 23.1 ± 7.9b |
| Ammonium sulfate | 11.4 ± 3.3ac | 4.43 ± 1.8a* |
| Phosphorus nitrate | 15.9 ± 1.4ac | 9.16 ± 2.1ab |
| Urea | 7.63 ± 0.1a | 5.23 ± 1.6a |
| Negative control | 12.9 ± 0.8ac | 3.72 ± 1.2a |
| Positive control | 14.8 ± 5.1ac | 1.92 ± 1.3a* |
Protease essay was evaluated after biphasic fermentation with solid fermentation in parboiled rice for 10 or 20 days
Lowercase letters refer to comparison between different components in culture medium, where averages followed by equal letters in the same column do not differ significantly from each other (P > 0.05)
*Refer to comparison between different components in the culture medium, where averages in the same column differ significantly in relation to the group supplemented with sodium nitrate (P > 0.01)
Experimental design with 12 trials used to perform the response surface methodology
| Races | Riboflavin (%) | NaNO3 (%) | Proteolytic activity (U/mL) | Conidia/mL (10 9) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.001 | 0.006 | 14.050 | 10.350 |
| 2 | 0.199 | 0.006 | 4.150 | 7.300 |
| 3 | 0.001 | 0.310 | 10.633 | 16.30 |
| 4 | 0.199 | 0.310 | 5.400 | 4.30 |
| 5 | 0 | 0.158 | 16.750 | 17.90 |
| 6 | 0.240 | 0.158 | 12.450 | 13.350 |
| 7 | 0.1 | 0 | 4.700 | 9.150 |
| 8 | 0.1 | 0.373 | 2.700 | 6.450 |
| 9 | 0.1 | 0.158 | 9.4 | 10.850 |
| 10 | 0.1 | 0.158 | 14.683 | 12.950 |
| 11 | 0.1 | 0.158 | 12.95 | 15.800 |
| 12 | 0.1 | 0.158 | 14.933 | 15.050 |
Two variables were used (riboflavin and sodium nitrate) each with 5 levels and their respective values of proteolytic activity and conidia production of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575
Analysis of variance for the response equation developed in the optimization of proteases production by Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575
| Source | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean Square | F value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 229.3 | 5 | 45.86 | 9.010 | 0.001 |
| A-Riboflavin | 56.26 | 1 | 56.26 | 11.06 | 0.016 |
| B-Sodium nitrate | 3.120 | 1 | 3.120 | 0.613 | 0.463 |
| AB | 5.440 | 1 | 5.440 | 1.070 | 0.341 |
| A2 | 2.760 | 1 | 2.760 | 0.542 | 0.489 |
| B2 | 147.0 | 1 | 147.0 | 28.90 | 0.002 |
| Residual | 30.53 | 6 | 5.090 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 11.00 | 3 | 3.670 | 0.563 | 0.676 |
| Pure Error | 19.53 | 3 | 6.510 | ||
| Cor Total | 259.8 | 11 |
Fig. 1Response surface plots of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 produced in parboiled rice supplemented with riboflavin and sodium nitrate. A Response surface plot of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 for proteolytic activity. B Response surface plot for conidial production of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575. The unit measurement used was gram by weight (g/wt)
Fig. 2Relative viability (%) of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 produced in parboiled rice supplemented or unsupplemented with riboflavin and sodium nitrate after exposure to heat stress. Rice was washed with Tween 80® (0.01% v/v) after twenty days of solid fermentation. The groups evaluated were: A: Crude extract produced in supplemented medium; B: Conidia produced in supplemented medium; C: Crude extract produced in unsupplemented medium; D: Conidia produced in unsupplemented medium. Samples of each group were exposed to 45 ± 0.2 °C and at each 1 h of exposure an aliquot was inoculated in culture medium for germination analysis. All exposure times were compared to the 0 h of heat exposure. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01 according to Tukey’s Test
Fig. 3Comparison between relative viability (%) of Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575 produced in parboiled rice supplemented and unsupplemented with riboflavin and sodium nitrate after exposure to heat stress. Rice was washed with Tween 80® (0.01% v/v) after twenty days of solid fermentation. One part of the crude extract was kept and the other part was centrifugates, filtered and conidia were resuspended in Tween 80® (0.01% v/v). Samples of each group were exposed to 45 ± 0.2 °C and at each 1 h of exposure an aliquot was inoculated in culture medium for germination analysis. Different treatments were compared at the same exposure times: A: Crude extract produced in supplemented and unsupplemented medium; B: Conidia produced in supplemented and unsupplemented medium; C: Crude extract and conidia produced in supplemented medium; D: Crude extract and conidia produced in unsupplemented medium. Samples of each group were exposed to 45 ± 0.2 °C and at each 1 h of exposure an aliquot was inoculated in culture medium for germination analysis. Different letters indicates *P < 0.05 according to Tukey’s Test
Cumulative mortality of Aedes aegypti larvae after treatment with Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575
| Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL | Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL | Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | |||||||||
| 3 days | 5 days | 10 days | |||||||||
| Crude extract | None | 66.7 ± 8.8Aa | 80.0 ± 5.8Aa | Crude extract | None | 90.0 ± 5.8Aa | 96.7 ± 3.3Aa | Crude extract | None | 100 ± 0Aa | 100.0 ± 0Aa |
| Conidia | None | 60.0 ± 5.8Aa | 66.7 ± 12.0Aa | Conidia | None | 80.0 ± 100 Aa | 90.0 ± 5.8Aa | Conidia | None | 100 ± 0Aa | 96.7 ± 3.3Aa |
| Supernatant | None | 15.0 ± 5.0Ab | 15.0 ± 5.0Ab | Supernatant | None | 15.0 ± 5.0Ab | 20.0 ± 0Ab | Supernatant | None | 30.0 ± 10.0Ab | 35.0 ± 5.0Ab |
| Crude extract | Heat | 60.0 ± 5.8Aa | 50.0 ± 5.8Aab | Crude extract | Heat | 76.0 ± 3.3Aa | 83.3 ± 120 Aa | Crude extract | Heat | 93.3 ± 3.3Aa | 96.7 ± 3.3Aa |
| Conidia | Heat | 53.3 ± 3.33Aa | 66.7 ± 6.7Aa | Conidia | Heat | 83.3 ± 6.7Aa | 90.0 ± 5.8Aa | Conidia | Heat | 100 ± 0Aa | 96.7 ± 3.3Aa |
| Supernatant | Heat | 70.0 ± 20.0Aa | 15.0 ± 15.0Bb | Supernatant | Heat | 70.0 ± 20.0Aa | 25.0 ± 15Bb | Supernatant | Heat | 90.0 ± 0Aa | 45.0 ± 5.0Bb |
| Control | 0 ± 0 | Control | 10 ± 3.3 | Control | 10 ± 3.3 | ||||||
After twenty days of solid fermentation, rice was washed with Tween 80® (0.1% v/v). One part of crude extract was kept and the other part was centrifuged and filtered. Conidia were resuspended in Tween 80® (0.1% v/v) and supernatant stored. The three treatments (crude extract. conidia and supernatant) were separated into two subgroups: one kept at 27 ± 1 °C and the other exposed to 45 ± 0.2 °C for 2 h. Larvae were treated with the three types of treatments after biphasic fermentation in media supplemented (SUPPL) with riboflavin and sodium nitrate or unsupplemented media (UNSUPPL). The same treatments produced in different culture media or different treatments submitted to the same stress conditions were compared. Larvae were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C. Relative humidity greater than 75% and 12 h photoperiod for 10 days
Equal capital letters in the same row indicate no significant difference and equal lower-case letters in the same column indicate no significant difference according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05)
Comparison between cumulative mortality of Aedes aegypti larvae after treatment with Metarhizium robertsii ARSEF 2575
| Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL | Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL | Treat | Stress | SUPPL | UNSUPPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | Mortality (%) | |||||||||
| 3 Days | 5 Days | 10 Days | |||||||||
| Crude extract | None | 66.7 ± 8.8A | 80.0 ± 5.8A | Crude extract | None | 90.0 ± 5.8A | 96.7 ± 3.3A | Crude extract | None | 100 ± 0A | 100.0 ± 0A |
| Crude extract | Heat | 60.0 ± 5.8A | 50.0 ± 5.8A | Crude extract | Heat | 76.0 ± 3.3A | 83.3 ± 12.0A | Crude extract | Heat | 93.3 ± 3.3A | 96.7 ± 3.3A |
| Conidia | None | 60.0 ± 5.8A | 66.7 ± 12.0A | Conidia | None | 80.0 ± 10.0A | 90.0 ± 5.8A | Conidia | None | 100 ± 0A | 96.7 ± 3.3A |
| Conidia | Heat | 53.3 ± 3.33A | 66.7 ± 6.7A | Conidia | Heat | 83.3 ± 6.7A | 90.0 ± 5.8A | Conidia | Heat | 100 ± 0A | 96.7 ± 3.3A |
| Supernatant | None | 15.0 ± 5.0A | 15.0 ± 5.0A | Supernatant | None | 15.0 ± 5.0A | 20.0 ± 0A | Supernatant | None | 30.0 ± 10.0A | 35.0 ± 5.0A |
| Supernatant | Heat | 70.0 ± 20.0B | 15.0 ± 15.0A | Supernatant | Heat | 70.0 ± 20.0B | 25.0 ± 15A | Supernatant | Heat | 90.0 ± 0B | 45.0 ± 5.0A |
| Control | 0 ± 0 | Control | 10 ± 3.3 | Control | 10 ± 3.3 | ||||||
After twenty days of solid fermentation, rice was washed with Tween 80® (0.1% v/v). One part of crude extract was kept and the other part was centrifuged and filtered. Conidia were resuspended in Tween 80® (0.1% v/v) and supernatant stored. The three treatments (crude extract. conidia and supernatant) were separated into two subgroups: one kept at 27 ± 1 °C and the other exposed to 45 ± 0.2 °C for 2 h. Larvae were treated with the three types of treatments after biphasic fermentation in media supplemented (SUPPL) with riboflavin and sodium nitrate or unsupplemented media (UNSUPPL). The same treatments produced on different culture media or subjected to the same stress conditions were compared. Larvae were incubated at 25 ± 1 °C. Relative humidity greater than 75% and 12 h photoperiod for 10 days
Equal capital letters in the same column indicate no significant difference according to Tukey's Test (P < 0.05)