Richard S Henry1,2, Linda Kwakkenbos3,4, Marie-Eve Carrier1, Zelalem Negeri1,5, Angelica Bourgeault1, Scott Patten6,7,8, Susan J Bartlett9,10, Luc Mouthon11,12, John Varga13, Andrea Benedetti14, Brett D Thombs1,2,5,9,15,16,17. 1. Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC H3T 1E4, Canada. 2. Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 3. Department of Clinical Psychology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 4. Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. 5. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 6. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 7. Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 8. O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. 9. Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 10. Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. 11. Service de Médecine Interne, Centre de Référence Maladies Autoimmunes Systémiques Rares d'Ile de France, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France. 12. APHP-CUP, Hôpital Cochin, Université de Paris, Paris, France. 13. Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 14. Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada. 15. Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 16. Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 17. Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Due to the health, social, and economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, there are concerns about mental health implications, especially among people susceptible to serious illness or death from COVID-19 due to pre-existing medical conditions. A living systematic review (ie, a systematic review that is continually updated) found that general mental health, anxiety, and depression symptoms did not worsen substantively in the general population in the early months of the pandemic. Among people with pre-existing medical conditions, however, anxiety symptoms worsened significantly (three studies; n=2053; standardised mean difference [SMD] 0·27 [95% CI 0·01 to 0·54]) but depression symptoms did not change (three studies; N=2006; SMD 0·01 [–0·15 to 0·17]).Individuals with systemic sclerosis (also called scleroderma) are at risk of complications if infected with SARS-CoV-2. More than 40% of people with systemic sclerosis have interstitial lung disease, many are frail, and immunosuppressant medication use is common.4, 5 Our Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network (SPIN) Cohort study, which was included in the COVID-19 living systematic review, found that anxiety symptoms increased substantially from before COVID-19 to April 9–27, 2020 (n=435; SMD 0·51 [95% CI 0·37 to 0·64]) but depression symptoms did not (n=388; SMD –0·05 [–0·19 to 0·09]).To our knowledge, no studies have tracked mental health symptoms among people with pre-existing medical conditions before COVID-19 and at regular intervals throughout the pandemic. The objective of the present study was to follow up our previous systemic sclerosis COVID-19 mental health study, which reported findings up until April 9–27, 2020 to describe anxiety and depression symptom trajectories from late-2019 to March, 2021. Detailed methods are provided in the appendix (pp 2–3). Researchers developed study objectives and methods in collaboration with an eight-member patient advisory team.We performed a longitudinal study, which included participants from the ongoing SPIN Cohort5, 7 who enrolled separately in the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort from April 9–27, 2020. Deterministic linking (email addresses) was used to merge sociodemographic, medical, and anxiety and depression symptom data before COVID-19 from the SPIN Cohort with anxiety and depression symptom data collected from April 9–27, 2020, to March, 2021, via the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort. The SPIN (number MP-05-2013-150) and SPIN-COVID-19 (number 2021-2286) Cohorts were approved by the research ethics committee of the Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Centre-Ouest-de-l'Île-de-Montréal. The SPIN Cohort was also approved by ethics committees of SPIN recruiting sites.Eligible SPIN Cohort participants are recruited during regular medical visits and must be 18 years or older and meet the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism systemic sclerosis criteria. SPIN Cohort participants provided written informed consent for participation and to be contacted about additional studies. For pre-COVID-19 SPIN Cohort measures, we used the last anxiety (PROMIS Anxiety 4a version 1.0; assessed every 3 months) and depression (eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire; assessed every 6 months) symptom assessments between July 1 and Dec 31, 2019. We assessed anxiety and depression symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic with the same measures every 2 weeks from April 9 until July 22, 2020, and then every 4 weeks. We used multivariate imputation via chained equations to account for missing data. Statistical analysis methods are shown in the appendix (p 4).Of 1251 active SPIN Cohort participants who had completed an assessment during the 6-month period before the COVID-19 pandemic, 435 (35%) enrolled in the separate SPIN COVID-19 Cohort, and all enrolled participants were included in the main analyses. A participant flow chart is shown in the appendix (p 5). Mean age was 56·9 years, most participants were White (360 [83%] of 435) and female (385 [89%]), and mean time since diagnosis was 12·1 years (SD 7·8). Participant countries of residence included France (159 [37%]), the USA (128 [29%]), Canada (98 [23%]), and the UK (50 [11%]). Detailed participant characteristics are shown in the appendix (p 6).As shown in figure A
, mean anxiety symptom scores increased substantially from before the pandemic to April, 2020 (SMD 0·51 [95% CI 0·37 to 0·64]) but decreased again to levels seen before the pandemic by March, 2021 (SMD 0·05 [–0·08 to 0·19]). Depression symptoms (figure C) were not substantively different from before the pandemic to April, 2020 (SMD –0·05 [–0·19 to 0·09]) but were significantly lower subsequently—although minimally—from before the pandemic to March, 2021 (SMD –0·20 [95% CI –0·35 to –0·06]). As shown in figure B and D, results were similar when evaluated only among participants who completed at least ten of 15 assessments during the pandemic period (277 [64%] of 435). Means and SDs across assessments for the full sample, those who completed at least ten of 15 assessments, and the number of participants who completed each assessment are shown in the appendix (p 7). Anxiety symptom patterns were similar across time by subgroups defined by age, sex, country, and systemic sclerosis subtype (appendix pp 8–9).
Figure
Anxiety and depression scores before and during the COVID-19 pandemic
Mean anxiety (A) and depression (C) symptom scores with 95% CIs for the SPIN Cohort subsample before the COVID-19 pandemic and at each assessment during the pandemic. Mean anxiety (B) and depression (D) symptom scores with 95% CIs for those who completed ten or more assessments. Anxiety was scored with PROMIS Anxiety 4a version 1.0 and depression was scored with the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire. For number of participants at each timepoint see the appendix (p 7).
Anxiety and depression scores before and during the COVID-19 pandemicMean anxiety (A) and depression (C) symptom scores with 95% CIs for the SPIN Cohort subsample before the COVID-19 pandemic and at each assessment during the pandemic. Mean anxiety (B) and depression (D) symptom scores with 95% CIs for those who completed ten or more assessments. Anxiety was scored with PROMIS Anxiety 4a version 1.0 and depression was scored with the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire. For number of participants at each timepoint see the appendix (p 7).Compared with before the COVID-19 pandemic, anxiety symptoms increased substantially when assessed April 9–27, 2020, whereas depression symptoms did not. Both anxiety and depression symptoms improved later in 2020, with anxiety symptoms returning to pre-COVID-19 levels and depression symptoms slightly lower than the pre-pandemic level.To our knowledge, this study is the first to report regular mental health assessments in any population with a pre-existing medical condition before and at regular intervals throughout the pandemic. In contrast to studies conducted in general population samples from several countries, which found negligible to small worsening of mental health early in the pandemic, people with systemic sclerosis reported a substantial increase in anxiety symptoms, but not in depression symptoms. Among the general population studies, mental health improved by late-2020, which is consistent with findings from our systemic sclerosis cohort.The finding that anxiety symptoms increased initially during the COVID-19 pandemic among people with systemic sclerosis but depression symptoms did not is consistent with the results of a living systematic review, which synthesised results from studies of participants with pre-existing medical conditions and similarly found that anxiety symptoms, but not depression symptoms, increased. Among studies included in the review, the largest were an initial report of the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort (n=435) and a study of 1504 people with rheumatoid arthritis (n=1126), osteoarthritis (n=277), or systemic lupus erythematosus (n=101), which found that from 2019, to March to June, 2020, anxiety increased by a SMD of 0·26 (95% CI 0·19 to 0·33; n=1504), whereas depression symptoms were stable (0·04 [–0·03 to 0·11]; n=1504).These findings were not surprising to patient members of our research team. When we had an initial meeting to prioritise outcomes for the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort and for an intervention trial to support mental health in COVID-19 among people with systemic sclerosis, members of our patient advisory team were unanimous in encouraging the prioritisation of anxiety for monitoring and for the primary trial outcome, which we did. They believed that people with systemic sclerosis would have increased anxiety due to their susceptibility to poor outcomes if infected with SARS-CoV-2 and due to restrictions in health-care access, which made managing their condition difficult. They thought that depression symptoms would be less influenced because, in their opinion, many people with systemic sclerosis already had to cope with some degree of isolation and had developed resilience.Strengths of our study include the large, multinational cohort of people with systemic sclerosis, which has similar participant characteristics to other major systemic sclerosis cohorts, and the comparison of pre-COVID-19 mental health symptoms with data collected throughout the pandemic. Some limitations should also be considered. The SPIN Cohort is a convenience sample, and those who enrolled in the SPIN-COVID-19 Cohort were a subset of SPIN Cohort participants; thus, they might not be representative of all people with systemic sclerosis. Furthermore, participants completed questionnaires online, which might further reduce generalisability due to the need to be able to access and complete forms via the internet.To summarise, anxiety symptoms, but not depression symptoms, increased substantially among people with systemic sclerosis early in the pandemic. Anxiety symptoms decreased quickly thereafter and returned to levels from before the pandemic. This finding, however, is an aggregate pattern. The pandemic has affected individuals in different ways, and some people with systemic sclerosis who did not previously have mental health difficulties are likely to have had new challenges. Health-care providers should understand that, overall, people with systemic sclerosis appear to be resilient, but that there are likely to be some people who are struggling and would benefit from assessment and mental health support.RSH, LK, M-EC, SP, SJB, LM, JV, ABe, BDT, and members of the SPIN-COVID-19 patient advisory team were responsible for study concept and design. RSH, LK, M-EC, ABo, ABe, and BDT were responsible for data acquisition. RSH and LK directly accessed and verified the data. RSH, ZN, and ABe were responsible for statistical analysis. RSH and BDT drafted the manuscript. All authors provided critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content, approved the final version, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. LM reports personal fees from Actelion/Johnson & Johnson; grants from LFB; non-financial support from Octapharma; and non-financial support from Grifols, all outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests. De-identified individual participant data with a data dictionary and analysis codes that were used to generate the results reported in this Comment will be made available upon request to the corresponding author and presentation of a methodologically sound proposal that is approved by the SPIN data access and publications committee. Data will be available after publication. Data requesters will need to sign a data transfer agreement. The study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (number VR4-172745, GA4-177764), McGill Interdisciplinary Initiative in Infection and Immunity Emergency COVID-19 Research Fund; Scleroderma Canada, made possible by an educational grant for patient support programming from Boehringer Ingelheim; Scleroderma Society of Ontario; Scleroderma Manitoba; Scleroderma Atlantic; Scleroderma Australia; Scleroderma New South Wales; Scleroderma Victoria; Scleroderma Queensland; Scleroderma SASK; Scleroderma Association of BC; and Sclérodermie Québec. RSH and ZN were supported by Mitacs post-doctoral fellowship awards, ABe was supported by a Fonds de recherche du Québec—Santé senior researcher salary award, and BDT was supported by a tier 1 Canada Research Chair, all outside of the submitted work. No sponsor had any role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, or interpretation, writing of the report, or in the decision to submit for publication.
Authors: Frank van den Hoogen; Dinesh Khanna; Jaap Fransen; Sindhu R Johnson; Murray Baron; Alan Tyndall; Marco Matucci-Cerinic; Raymond P Naden; Thomas A Medsger; Patricia E Carreira; Gabriela Riemekasten; Philip J Clements; Christopher P Denton; Oliver Distler; Yannick Allanore; Daniel E Furst; Armando Gabrielli; Maureen D Mayes; Jacob M van Laar; James R Seibold; Laszlo Czirjak; Virginia D Steen; Murat Inanc; Otylia Kowal-Bielecka; Ulf Müller-Ladner; Gabriele Valentini; Douglas J Veale; Madelon C Vonk; Ulrich A Walker; Lorinda Chung; David H Collier; Mary Ellen Csuka; Barri J Fessler; Serena Guiducci; Ariane Herrick; Vivien M Hsu; Sergio Jimenez; Bashar Kahaleh; Peter A Merkel; Stanislav Sierakowski; Richard M Silver; Robert W Simms; John Varga; Janet E Pope Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Yannick Allanore; Robert Simms; Oliver Distler; Maria Trojanowska; Janet Pope; Christopher P Denton; John Varga Journal: Nat Rev Dis Primers Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 52.329
Authors: Dane H Dougherty; Linda Kwakkenbos; Marie-Eve Carrier; Gloria Salazar; Shervin Assassi; Murray Baron; Susan J Bartlett; Daniel E Furst; Karen Gottesman; Frank van den Hoogen; Vanessa L Malcarne; Luc Mouthon; Warren R Nielson; Serge Poiraudeau; Maureen Sauvé; Gilles Boire; Alessandra Bruns; Lorinda Chung; Christopher Denton; James V Dunne; Paul Fortin; Tracy Frech; Anna Gill; Jessica Gordon; Ariane L Herrick; Monique Hinchcliff; Marie Hudson; Sindhu R Johnson; Niall Jones; Suzanne Kafaja; Maggie Larché; Joanne Manning; Janet Pope; Robert Spiera; Virginia Steen; Evelyn Sutton; Carter Thorne; Pearce Wilcox; Brett D Thombs; Maureen D Mayes Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2018-09-01 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Brett D Thombs; Linda Kwakkenbos; Richard S Henry; Marie-Eve Carrier; Scott Patten; Sami Harb; Angelica Bourgeault; Lydia Tao; Susan J Bartlett; Luc Mouthon; John Varga; Andrea Benedetti Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2020-10-03 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Brett D Thombs; Linda Kwakkenbos; Brooke Levis; Angelica Bourgeault; Richard S Henry; Alexander W Levis; Sami Harb; Lydia Tao; Marie-Eve Carrier; Laura Bustamante; Delaney Duchek; Laura Dyas; Ghassan El-Baalbaki; Kelsey Ellis; Danielle B Rice; Amanda Wurz; Julia Nordlund; Maria Gagarine; Kimberly A Turner; Nora Østbø; Nicole Culos-Reed; Shannon Hebblethwaite; Scott Patten; Susan J Bartlett; John Varga; Luc Mouthon; Sarah Markham; Michael S Martin; Andrea Benedetti Journal: Lancet Rheumatol Date: 2021-04-16
Authors: Emily A Holmes; Rory C O'Connor; V Hugh Perry; Irene Tracey; Simon Wessely; Louise Arseneault; Clive Ballard; Helen Christensen; Roxane Cohen Silver; Ian Everall; Tamsin Ford; Ann John; Thomas Kabir; Kate King; Ira Madan; Susan Michie; Andrew K Przybylski; Roz Shafran; Angela Sweeney; Carol M Worthman; Lucy Yardley; Katherine Cowan; Claire Cope; Matthew Hotopf; Ed Bullmore Journal: Lancet Psychiatry Date: 2020-04-15 Impact factor: 27.083
Authors: Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold; Oliver Distler; Cosimo Bruni; Christopher P Denton; Jeska de Vries-Bouwstra; Marco Matucci Cerinic; Madelon C Vonk; Armando Gabrielli Journal: Lancet Rheumatol Date: 2022-07-21