| Literature DB >> 34901655 |
Xinfeng Wu1, Shanshan Shi1, Ying Wang2, Bo Tang3, Leyang Guo2, Yuan Gao1, Tao Jiang2, Ke Yang4, Kai Sun1, Yuantao Zhao2, Wenge Li2, Jinhong Yu5.
Abstract
The low thermal conductivity and poor shape stability of phase change materials (PCMs) have seriously restricted their applications in energy storage and energy saving. In this paper, poly(ethylene glycol)-calcium chloride/carbon/carbon fiber felt (PEG-CaCl2/CCF) PCMs were fabricated by a liquid-phase impregnation-vacuum drying-hot compression molding method with carbon/carbon fiber felt as the three-dimensional (3D) thermal skeleton and PEG-CaCl2 as the polymer PCM matrix. PCMs were heated and compressed by the compression confinement method to improve the contact area between 3D skeleton carbon fibers. The carbon fibers in PCMs presented a 3D (X-Y-Z) network structure and the fiber arrangement was anisotropic, which were beneficial to improve the thermal conductivity of PCMs in the fiber direction. The compression confinement can improve the contact area between the fibers in the 3D skeleton. As a result, the thermal conductivity of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs can reach 3.35 W/(m K) (in-plane) and 1.94 W/(m K) (through-plane), about 985 and 571% of that of PEG-CaCl2, respectively. Due to the complexation of PEG and CaCl2 and the 3D skeleton support of carbon fiber felt, PCMs have excellent shape stability. The paper may provide some suggestions for the preparation of high thermal conductivity and excellent shape stability PCMs.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34901655 PMCID: PMC8655943 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c05186
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1SEM images of carbon/carbon fiber felt: (a1) and (a2) are in the in-plane direction (X–Y plane) and (b1) and (b2) are in the through-plane direction (X–Z plane).
Figure 2SEM images of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs: (a1) and (a2) are in the in-plane direction (X–Y plane) and (b1) and (b2) are in the through-plane direction (X–Z plane).
Figure 3DSC curves of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs: (a) DSC curves and (b) ΔH.
Phase Change Temperature and Latent Heat of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs
| crystallization temperature— | crystallization peak temperature— | melting temperature— | melting peak temperature— | Δ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEG-CaCl2 | 31.9 | 26.2 | 38.1 | 47.7 | 98.65 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CCF-1 | 27.6 | 20.0 | 38.4 | 47.2 | 75.20 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CCF-1.5 | 22.2 | 17.2 | 35.6 | 43.7 | 61.86 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CCF-2 | 27.8 | 21.5 | 37.6 | 45.5 | 58.67 |
Figure 4Thermal conductivity of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs: (a) in-plane (λin-plane) and out-plane (λthrough-plane) thermal conductivities at 25 °C and (b) λPCMS/λPEG-CaCl.
Figure 5Thermal conductivities of different kinds of PCMs.
Detailed Comparisons of the Thermal Conductivities of Different kinds of PCMs
| year | method | materials | filler content | λ (W/(m K)) | reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | freeze-drying orientation | paraffin/h-BN | 18 wt % h-BN | 0.85 | ( |
| 2018 | freeze-drying orientation | PEG/BN | 28.7 wt % BN | 3.18 | ( |
| 2015 | self-assembly | palmitic acid/GO/OA | 2 wt % GO | 0.419 | ( |
| 2019 | self-assembly | 1-octadecanol/graphene | 1.5 wt % graphene | 0.358 | ( |
| 2020 | interfacial polyelectrolyte complex spinning | PEG/BN/CNF/CS macrofibers | 47.5 wt % BN-OH | 4.005 | ( |
| 2017 | 3D carbon aerogel | paraffin/carbon aerogels | 2 wt % carbon aerogels | 2.182 | ( |
| 2019 | 3D carbon foam | paraffin@carbon sponge | 7.8 wt % carbon | 0.434 | ( |
| 2020 | 3D graphene foam | paraffin/3DC | 9 wt % 3D graphene | 2.3 | ( |
| 2017 | Cu foam | myristyl alcohol/Cu foam | 46.6 wt % Cu foam | 1.452 | ( |
| 2019 | carbon nanotube–Cu foam | paraffin/CNT-Cu foam | 41.2 wt % Cu, 0.68 wt % CNT | 3.49 | ( |
| 2020 | porous silica | paraffin/SHC/EG | 10 wt % EG + 10 wt % SHC | 5.87 | ( |
| 2021 | carbon/carbon fiber network | PEG-CaCl2/CCF | 31.32 wt % CCF | 3.35 | our work |
Figure 6Mechanism of heat conduction in PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs: (a) X–Y direction (in-plane) and (b) Z-direction (through-plane).
Figure 7Leakage diagram of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of the preparation process of carbon/carbon fiber felt.
Figure 9Preparation process of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs.
Composition of PEG-CaCl2/CCF PCMs
| samples | CF/C (wt %) | CaCl2 (wt %) |
|---|---|---|
| PEG-CaCl2 | 0 | 12.89 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CF-1 | 17.12 | 10.68 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CF-1.5 | 23.01 | 9.92 |
| PEG-CaCl2/CF-2 | 31.32 | 8.85 |